An easy-to-use and reliable tool is essential for gait assessment of people with gait pathologies. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the OneStep smartphone application compared to the C-Mill-VR+ treadmill (Motek, Nederlands), among patients undergoing rehabilitation for unilateral lower extremity disability. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were extracted from the treadmill and from two smartphones, one on each leg. Inter-device reliability was evaluated using Pearson correlation, intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen’s d, comparing the application’s readings from the two phones. Validity was assessed by comparing readings from each phone to the treadmill. Twenty-eight patients completed the study; the median age was 45.5 years, and 61% were males. The ICC between the phones showed a high correlation (r = 0.89–1) and good-to-excellent reliability (ICC range, 0.77–1) for all the gait parameters examined. The correlations between the phones and the treadmill were mostly above 0.8. The ICC between each phone and the treadmill demonstrated moderate-to-excellent validity for all the gait parameters (range, 0.58–1). Only ‘step length of the impaired leg’ showed poor-to-good validity (range, 0.37–0.84). Cohen’s d effect size was small (d < 0.5) for all the parameters. The studied application demonstrated good reliability and validity for spatiotemporal gait assessment in patients with unilateral lower limb disability.

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed barriers to a healthy lifestyle, especially for older adults who are considered to be at a high-risk of infection. This study examined the associations between negative changes and the self-classification to COVID-19 risk level among physically active older adults who are members of a nationwide health club chain. A cross-sectional digital survey was sent to 19,160 older adults (age ≥ 65). The data collected included information on the subjects’ self-classification to the COVID-19 high-risk group (HRG) and changes in physical activity (PA), body weight, and smoking habits since the outbreak. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the dependent variables of ‘experienced a negative change’ and the independent variables. Of the 1670 survey respondents, 78.3% classified themselves as COVID-19 HRG. Over half of the respondents reported a reduction in PA hours, 26.6% reported weight gain, and 17.7% of smokers increased their amount of smoking. A self-classification to the HRG was associated with 1.46 (95%CI 1.10–1.93, p < 0.009) and 1.67 (95%CI 1.21–2.31, p < 0.002) greater odds for reduced hours of exercise and weight gain compared to the not high-risk group, respectively. Decision makers should consider how policies may cause barriers to a healthy lifestyle and develop risk communication strategies to encourage positive health-related behaviors, even during a pandemic.

Background: Nutrition therapy plans (NTPs) in discharge summaries of tube‐fed patients transferred from acute‐care hospitals to rehabilitation centers are fundamental for continuity of care. This study examined the presence and quality of NTPs in discharge summaries of tube‐fed patients.Methods: This cross‐sectional study was based on data retrieved from electronic medical records. The outcome measures were the presence of NTPs in discharge summaries, the presence of key elements of the NTPs, and the level of compatibility between multiple NTPs per discharge summary prepared by different health professionals. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the number of NTPs, the presence of key elements, and the degree of compatibility between NTPs for the same patient.Results: A total of 100 discharge summaries of tube‐fed patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital during 2015–2017 were identified. The majority (91%) of discharge summaries included at least one NTP; 57 included more than one. Variance in the presence of key elements was observed in 165 NTPs prepared by physicians, nurses, and dietitians. Water amount and nutrition route were least reported by dietitians (6.3% and 9.4%, respectively), compared with physicians (77.6% and 81%) and nurses (77.3% and 62.7%). However, nutrition details were reported more frequently by dietitians (65.6%) than physicians (20.7%) and nurses (32%). Low compatibility was observed between dietitians and both nurses and physicians, in the range of 0%–26%.Conclusion: Large discrepancies were found between NTPs for the same patient prepared by dietitians, physicians, and/or nurses, and a portion of patients arrived without any NTP.

Background: Pain self‐management (PSM) programs have demonstrated effectiveness as a pain management strategy, yet evidence remains scarce for patients with chronic pain treated with medical cannabis. We aimed to explore feasibility aspects and practical applications of developing and implementing a group‐based PSM intervention in this context.Methods: Twenty‐two semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 chronic pain patients treated with cannabis and 12 clinicians from a range of expertise.Results: Overall, the interviewees believed that the proposed intervention is feasible; yet it is essential to consider the following aspects during program planning and implementation. Inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified five major themes. The first is that the program enablers include the intrinsic benefits of therapeutic group dynamics, aligning expectations, and setting individual goals at program initiation. The second theme is the program barriers. These include expected challenges for participants due to behavioral and mental changes that necessitate high commitment, the challenge for the group leader in delivering an appropriate response to each participant's emotional narrative; and managing logistical issues. The third theme is the psychological experience of living with pain, with an emphasis on addressing patients' emotional perspectives within the program's framework, namely, their perceptions of pain, fear of pain, and the relations of such to past experiences. The fourth theme is the psychoeducation on pain and cannabis use, including the brain‐pain connection and informed guidance regarding cannabis use. The fifth theme is the integration of guided movement and relaxation techniques in pain management, thus underscoring the importance of practice during the group sessions.Conclusions: Our findings suggest key elements that may inform planning PSM‐approach therapy groups, tailored to the particular needs of patients with chronic pain using medical cannabis.

Background: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by the acute and fluctuating impairment of cognition, attention, and consciousness, which is prevalent in older adults following surgical procedures. Despite the recognized impact of delirium on recovery, its specific effects on motor rehabilitation outcomes in the geriatric population remain underexplored. This historical cohort study aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of delirium upon admission to a rehabilitation hospital and the motor functional gain at discharge among older patients following hip fracture surgery. Methods: The collected data included socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medications, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Motor rehabilitation outcomes were assessed using Motor Absolute Functional Gain (mAFG), the Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (mMRFS), and Rehabilitation Efficiency (mRE). Results: Of the 143 hip fracture patients admitted for rehabilitation, 38 (26.6%) were diagnosed with delirium. Patients with delirium had lower MMSE scores (18.1 ± 5.8 vs. 22.4 ± 6.0, p < 0.001), higher benzodiazepine prescription rates (50.0% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001), and longer lengths of stay in acute care and rehabilitation (42.7 ± 10.4 vs. 37.3 ± 11.2 days, p = 0.01). Despite significant improvements in the FIM scores for both groups (p < 0.001), patients with delirium had lower mAFG (11.87 ± 7.26 vs. 15.91 ± 8.73, p = 0.01), mMRFS (0.22 ± 0.14 vs. 0.31 ± 0.15, p = 0.001), and mRE (0.28 ± 0.17 vs. 0.44 ± 0.25, p < 0.001). However, the multivariate regression models showed no association between delirium and functional improvement after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: While both patients with and without delirium showed improvement in their motor functions by the time they were discharged from a rehabilitation hospital, patients with delirium showed lower absolute and relative improvements. Tailored programs addressing the special needs of patients with delirium after hip fracture surgery may enhance outcomes for this vulnerable population. A specialized, multidisciplinary approach tailored to the patient’s cognitive status and overall condition is key to maximizing the recovery of older hip fracture patients with delirium.