The use of cannabis preparations has steadily increased. Although cannabis was traditionally assumed to only have mild vegetative side effects, it has become evident in recent years that severe cardiovascular complications can occur. Cannabis use has recently even been added to the risk factors for myocardial infarction. This review is dedicated to pathogenetic factors contributing to cannabis-related myocardial infarction. Tachycardia is highly important in this respect, and we provide evidence that activation of CB₁ receptors in brain regions important for cardiovascular regulation and of presynaptic CB₁ receptors on sympathetic and/or parasympathetic nerve fibers are involved. The prototypical factors for myocardial infarction, i.e., thrombus formation and coronary constriction, have also been considered, but there is little evidence that they play a decisive role. On the other hand, an increase in the formation of carboxyhemoglobin, impaired mitochondrial respiration, cardiotoxic reactions and tachyarrhythmias associated with the increased sympathetic tone are factors possibly intensifying myocardial infarction. A particularly important factor is that cannabis use is frequently accompanied by tobacco smoking. In conclusion, additional research is warranted to decipher the mechanisms involved, since cannabis use is being legalized increasingly and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and its synthetic analogue nabilone are indicated for the treatment of various disease states.

We have previously shown that in urethane-anaesthetized rats, intravenous injection of the angiotensin II (Ang II) AT₁ receptor antagonist losartan reversed the pressor effect of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor agonist CP55940 given in the paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus (PVN). The aim of our study was to determine the potential interactions in the PVN between CB₁ receptors and AT₁ and AT₂ receptors for Ang II and Mas receptors for Ang 1–7 in blood pressure regulation in conscious spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats. The pressor effects of Ang II, Ang 1–7 and CP55940 microinjected into the PVN were stronger in SHRs than in WKYs. Increases in blood pressure in response to Ang II were strongly inhibited by antagonists of AT₁ (losartan), AT₂ (PD123319) and CB₁ (AM251) receptors, to Ang 1–7 by a Mas antagonist (A-779) and AM251 and to CP55940 by losartan, PD123319 and A-779. Higher (AT₁ and CB₁) and lower (AT₂ and Mas) receptor expression in the PVN of SHR compared to WKY may partially explain the above differences. In conclusion, blood pressure control in the PVN depends on the mutual interaction of CB₁, AT₁, AT₂ and Mas receptors in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats and their normotensive controls.

This review is dedicated to the cross-talk between the (endo)cannabinoid and renin angiotensin systems (RAS). Activation of AT₁ receptors (AT₁Rs) by angiotensin II (Ang II) can release endocannabinoids that, by acting at cannabinoid CB₁ receptors (CB₁Rs), modify the response to AT₁R stimulation. CB₁R blockade may enhance AT₁R-mediated responses (mainly vasoconstrictor effects) or reduce them (mainly central nervous system-mediated effects). The final effects depend on whether stimulation of CB₁Rs and AT₁Rs induces opposite or the same effects. Second, CB₁R blockade may diminish AT₁R levels. Third, phytocannabinoids modulate angiotensin-converting enzyme-2. Additional studies are required to clarify (1) the existence of a cross-talk between the protective axis of the RAS (Ang II—AT₂ receptor system or angiotensin 1-7—Mas receptor system) with components of the endocannabinoid system, (2) the influence of Ang II on constituents of the endocannabinoid system and (3) the (patho)physiological significance of AT₁R-CB₁R heteromerization. As a therapeutic consequence, CB₁R antagonists may influence effects elicited by the activation or blockade of the RAS; phytocannabinoids may be useful as adjuvant therapy against COVID-19; single drugs acting on the (endo)cannabinoid system (cannabidiol) and the RAS (telmisartan) may show pharmacokinetic interactions since they are substrates of the same metabolizing enzyme of the transport mechanism.

Currently, no treatment can completely cure pulmonary hypertension (PH), which can lead to right ventricular failure and, consequently, death. Therefore, searching for new therapies remains important. Increased resistance in pulmonary circulation is mainly caused by the excessive contraction and proliferation of small pulmonary arteries. Cannabinoids, a group of lipophilic compounds that all interact with cannabinoid receptors, exert a pulmonary vasodilatory effect through several different mechanisms, including mechanisms that depend on vascular endothelium and/or receptor-based mechanisms, and may also have anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory properties. The vasodilatory effect is important in regulating pulmonary resistance, which can improve patients’ quality of life. Moreover, experimental studies on the effects of cannabidiol (plant-derived, non-psychoactive cannabinoid) in animal PH models have shown that cannabidiol reduces right ventricular systolic pressure and excessive remodelling and decreases pulmonary vascular hypertrophy and pulmonary vascular resistance. Due to the potentially beneficial effects of cannabinoids on pulmonary circulation and PH, in this work, we review whether cannabinoids can be used as an adjunctive therapy for PH. However, clinical trials are still needed to recommend the use of cannabinoids in the treatment of PH.

Although angiotensin 1-7 (Ang 1-7) and its role as a part of the "protective" axis of the renin-angiotensin system are well described in the literature, the mechanisms of its angiotensin II-like pressor and tachycardic effects following its acute central administration are not fully understood. It was the aim of the present study to examine which receptors contribute to the aforementioned cardiovascular effects. Ang 1-7 and antagonists for glutamate, GABA, vasopressin, thromboxane A₂ (TP), α₁-adrenergic, and P2X purinoceptors or modulators of oxidative stress were injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) of urethane-anesthetized male Wistar rats. Acute injection of Ang 1-7 into the PVN increased blood pressure (BP) by about 15 mmHg and heart rate (HR) by about 14 beats/min. After preinjection with bicuculline (GABA_A receptor antagonist), CNQX + D-AP5 (AMPA/kainate and NMDA receptor antagonists) and SQ29548 (TP receptor antagonist) the BP and HR reactions to Ang 1-7 were attenuated or abolished. The vasopressin V_1A and V_1B receptor antagonists conivaptan and nelivaptan, and the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin even reversed the pressor and tachycardic effects of Ang 1-7. Antagonists of P2X (PPADS) and α₁-adrenergic receptors (prazosin), the free radical scavenger tempol and the superoxide dismutase inhibitor DETC did not modify the cardiovascular effects of Ang 1-7. The (Mas receptor-related) rise in BP and HR evoked by Ang 1-7 administered to the rat PVN is linked to glutamate, vasopressin, GABA_A and thromboxane receptors, and to oxidative stress, but does not seem to involve α₁-adrenergic or P2X receptors.

Animal preclinical experiments in pulmonary hypertension (PH) need to be conducted with detailed methodological rigor to improve their translational relevance. One of its crucial yet insufficiently studied aspects is animal body weight (BW). Thus, our study aimed to examine the influence of initial BW on the severity of PH development induced by monocrotaline (MCT) and the effectiveness of the reference combined therapy (ambrisentan and tadalafil given for 21 days). Male rats were divided into three weight Sets: Set I (200–219 g); Set II (220–239 g); and Set III (240–259 g), after which, MCT-PH was induced. The measurements taken included in vivo echocardiographic evaluations, ex vivo functional experiments (on isolated right ventricle papillary muscles and pulmonary arteries), and histological and morphometric assessments. In all three Sets of animals, we noticed evidence of PH development. More pronounced changes confirming the severity of PH were observed in Set II compared to Sets I and III. The effectiveness of the reference therapy was also most evident in Set II, where the reversal of PH-related aggravations was best documented. We demonstrated that both the severity of MCT-induced PH in rats and the effectiveness of the reference combined therapy strongly depend on the animals’ initial BW.