Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies is not a simple issue. Although both processes harvest the energy in sunlight, they operate in distinctly different ways and produce different types of products: biomass or chemical fuels in the case of natural photosynthesis and nonstored electrical current in the case of photovoltaics. In order to find common ground for evaluating energy-conversion efficiency, we compare natural photosynthesis with present technologies for photovoltaic-driven electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen. Photovoltaic-driven electrolysis is the more efficient process when measured on an annual basis, yet short-term yields for photosynthetic conversion under optimal conditions come within a factor of 2 or 3 of the photovoltaic benchmark. We consider opportunities in which the frontiers of synthetic biology might be used to enhance natural photosynthesis for improved solar energy conversion efficiency.

Complexing Photosynthesis: Photosynthesis operates through a series of protein complexes that harvest sunlight and turn it into chemical energy. The separate complexes—including photosystems I and II, phycobilisome antennae, and reaction centers—are understood for a number of photosynthetic organisms; however, the large-scale organization and interactions between them are less clear. Using protein cross-linking, Liu et al. (p. 1104 ) demonstrate how the individual components are organized when present as a megacomplex in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803. Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy indicated that the phycobilisomes transfer energy to both photosystems, which is consistent with their molecular arrangement.

The high excitation energy-transfer efficiency demanded in photosynthetic organisms relies on the optimal pigment-protein binding orientation in the individual protein complexes and also on the overall architecture of the photosystem. In green sulfur bacteria, the membrane-attached Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) antenna protein functions as a “wire” to connect the large peripheral chlorosome antenna complex with the reaction center (RC), which is embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane (CM). Energy collected by the chlorosome is funneled through the FMO to the RC. Although there has been considerable effort to understand the relationships between structure and function of the individual isolated complexes, the specific architecture for in vivo interactions of the FMO protein, the CM, and the chlorosome, ensuring highly efficient energy transfer, is still not established experimentally. Here, we describe a mass spectrometry-based method that probes solvent-exposed surfaces of the FMO by labeling solvent-exposed aspartic and glutamic acid residues. The locations and extents of labeling of FMO on the native membrane in comparison with it alone and on a chlorosome-depleted membrane reveal the orientation. The large differences in the modification of certain peptides show that the Bchl a #3 side of the FMO trimer interacts with the CM, which is consistent with recent theoretical predictions. Moreover, the results also provide direct experimental evidence to confirm the overall architecture of the photosystem from Chlorobaculum tepidum ( C. tepidum ) and give information on the packing of the FMO protein in its native environment.