Stephanie C. Kerr

Dr. Stephanie C. Kerr


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFrancois Barbier
Francois Barbier
EDElizabeth Dun
Elizabeth Dun
SKStephanie C. Kerr
Stephanie C. Kerr
TCTinashe G. Chabikwa
Tinashe G. Chabikwa
CBChristine Anne Beveridge
Christine Anne Beveridge

18 May 2016 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilip B. Brewer
Philip B. Brewer
KYKaori Yoneyama
Kaori Yoneyama
Fiona FilardoFiona Filardo
Fiona Filardo
EMEmma Meyers
Emma Meyers
ASAdrian Scaffidi
Adrian Scaffidi
CBChristine Anne Beveridge
Christine Anne Beveridge
Significance: Strigolactone hormones regulate many plant growth and developmental processes and are particularly important in regulating growth in response to nonoptimal conditions. Plants produce a range of bioactive strigolactone-like compounds, suggesting that the biosynthesis pathway is complex. Despite this complexity, only one type of enzyme, the MORE AXILLARY GROWTH1 (MAX1) cytochrome P450, has been attributed to the diversity of strigolactones. Using transcriptomics and reverse genetics, we discovered a previously uncharacterized gene that encodes a 2-oxoglutarate and Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenase involved in strigolactone production downstream of MAX1. Studies with the corresponding mutant have shown that previously identified strigolactone-type compounds inArabidopsisare not the major strigolactone-type shoot branching hormone in this model species.

24 January 2023 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDa Cao
Da Cao
TCTinashe Chabikwa
Tinashe Chabikwa
FBFrancois Barbier
Francois Barbier
EDElizabeth Dun
Elizabeth Dun
FFFranziska Fichtner
Franziska Fichtner
CBChristine Anne Beveridge
Christine Anne Beveridge
The inhibition of shoot branching by the growing shoot tip of plants, termed apical dominance, was originally thought to be mediated by auxin. Recently, the importance of the shoot tip sink strength during apical dominance has re-emerged with recent studies highlighting roles for sugars in promoting branching. This raises many unanswered questions on the relative roles of auxin and sugars in apical dominance. Here we show that auxin depletion after decapitation is not always the initial trigger of rapid cytokinin (CK) increases in buds that are instead correlated with enhanced sugars. Auxin may also act through strigolactones (SLs) which have been shown to suppress branching after decapitation, but here we show that SLs do not have a significant effect on initial bud outgrowth after decapitation. We report here that when sucrose or CK is abundant, SLs are less inhibitory during the bud release stage compared to during later stages and that SL treatment rapidly inhibits CK accumulation in pea (Pisum sativum) axillary buds of intact plants. After initial bud release, we find an important role of gibberellin (GA) in promoting sustained bud growth downstream of auxin. We are, therefore, able to suggest a model of apical dominance that integrates auxin, sucrose, SLs, CKs, and GAs and describes differences in signalling across stages of bud release to sustained growth.

10 July 2021 in The Plant Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKStephanie C. Kerr
Stephanie C. Kerr
SPSuyash Patil
Suyash Patil
AGAlexandre de Saint Germain
Alexandre de Saint Germain
JPJean‐Paul Pillot
Jean‐Paul Pillot
JSJulie Saffar
Julie Saffar
CRCatherine Rameau
Catherine Rameau

2 March 2017 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKStephanie C. Kerr
Stephanie C. Kerr
FGFederico Gaiti
Federico Gaiti
CBChristine Anne Beveridge
Christine Anne Beveridge
MTMilos Tanurdzic
Milos Tanurdzic
The decision for a bud to grow into a branch is a key regulatory process affecting plant architecture. In order to study molecular processes regulating axillary bud outgrowth in the model plant garden pea (Pisum sativum), we sequenced the axillary bud transcriptome and performed de novo transcriptome assembly. We assembled a pea axillary bud transcriptome into 81,774 transcripts comprised of 194,067 isoforms. This new pea transcriptome resource is both comprehensive and representative, as shown by comparison to other available pea sequence resources. Over half of the transcriptome could be annotated based on sequence homology to Arabidopsis thaliana proteins, while almost one quarter of the isoforms were identified as putative long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). This transcriptome will be useful in studies of pea buds because it includes genes expressed specifically in buds which are not represented in other transcriptome studies. We also investigated the impact of a short time collection series on gene expression. Differential gene expression analysis identified 142 transcripts changing within the short 170 min time frame that the buds were harvested within. Thirty-three of these transcripts are implicated in diurnal fluctuations in other flowering plants, while the remaining transcripts include 31 putative lncRNA. Further investigation of the differentially expressed transcripts found an enrichment of genes involved in post-transcriptional regulation, including RNA processing and modification, as well as genes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation. We have sequenced and assembled a high quality pea bud transcriptome containing both coding and non-coding RNA transcripts that will be useful for further studies into axillary bud outgrowth. Over the short sample collection time frame of just 170 min, we identified differentially expressed coding and non-coding RNA, some of which are implicated in diurnal regulation, highlighting the utility of our transcriptome resource in identifying gene expression changes and informing future experimental designs.

17 December 2021 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFranziska Fichtner
Franziska Fichtner
FBFrancois Barbier
Francois Barbier
SKStephanie C. Kerr
Stephanie C. Kerr
CDCaitlin Dudley
Caitlin Dudley
PCPilar Cubas
Pilar Cubas
CBChristine Anne Beveridge
Christine Anne Beveridge
Shoot branching is a complex mechanism in which secondary shoots grow from buds that are initiated from meristems established in leaf axils. The model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has a rosette leaf growth pattern in the vegetative stage. After flowering initiation, the main stem elongates with the top leaf primordia developing into cauline leaves. Meristems in Arabidopsis initiate in the axils of rosette or cauline leaves, giving rise to rosette or cauline buds, respectively. Plasticity in the process of shoot branching is regulated by resource and nutrient availability as well as by plant hormones. However, few studies have attempted to test whether cauline and rosette branching are subject to the same plasticity. Here, we addressed this question by phenotyping cauline and rosette branching in three Arabidopsis ecotypes and several Arabidopsis mutants with varied shoot architectures. Our results showed no negative correlation between cauline and rosette branch numbers in Arabidopsis, demonstrating that there is no tradeoff between cauline and rosette bud outgrowth. Through investigation of the altered branching pattern of flowering pathway mutants and Arabidopsis ecotypes grown in various photoperiods and light regimes, we further elucidated that the number of cauline branches is closely related to flowering time. The number of rosette branches has an enormous plasticity compared with cauline branches and is influenced by genetic background, flowering time, light intensity, and temperature. Our data reveal different levels of plasticity in the regulation of branching at rosette and cauline nodes, and promote a framework for future branching analyses.