William Tran

Dr. William Tran

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WTWilliam Tyler Tran
William Tyler Tran
KJKatarzyna Jerzak
Katarzyna Jerzak
FLFang-I Lu
Fang-I Lu
JKJonathan Klein
Jonathan Klein
STSami Tabbarah
Sami Tabbarah
ASAli Sadeghi-Naini
Ali Sadeghi-Naini

1 April 2020 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKhadijeh Saednia
Khadijeh Saednia
STSami Tabbarah
Sami Tabbarah
WTWilliam Tran
William Tran
TWTina Wu
Tina Wu
JKJonathan Klein
Jonathan Klein
WTWilliam Tyler Tran
William Tyler Tran

26 November 2019 in Future Science OA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WTWilliam T Tran
William T Tran
HSHarini Suraweera
Harini Suraweera
KQKarina Quaioit
Karina Quaioit
DCDaniel Cardenas
Daniel Cardenas
KLKai X Leong
Kai X Leong
GCGregory J Czarnota
Gregory J Czarnota
Aim: We aimed to identify quantitative ultrasound (QUS)-radiomic markers to predict radiotherapy response in metastatic lymph nodes of head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: Node-positive head ... Lay abstract In this study, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and machine-learning classification was used to predict treatment outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. Metastatic lymph nodes in the ...

27 October 2021 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WTWilliam Tran
William Tran
ASAudrey Shiner
Audrey Shiner
MAMarie Angeli Alera
Marie Angeli Alera
LFLauren Fleshner
Lauren Fleshner
ELEthan Law
Ethan Law
WTWilliam Tyler Tran
William Tyler Tran
Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence. Methods: There were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Multiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836. Conclusion: These results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions.

13 October 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPChristopher J Pinard
Christopher J Pinard
WTWilliam Tran
William Tran
FLFang-I Lu
Fang-I Lu
JKJonathan Klein
Jonathan Klein
MOMichelle Oblak
Michelle Oblak
WTWilliam Tyler Tran
William Tyler Tran
Despite the important role of preclinical experiments to characterize tumor biology and molecular pathways, there are ongoing challenges to model the tumor microenvironment, specifically the dynamic interactions between tumor cells and immune infiltrates. Comprehensive models of host-tumor immune interactions will enhance the development of emerging treatment strategies, such as immunotherapies. Although in vitro and murine models are important for the early modelling of cancer and treatment-response mechanisms, comparative research studies involving veterinary oncology may bridge the translational pathway to human studies. The natural progression of several malignancies in animals exhibits similar pathogenesis to human cancers, and previous studies have shown a relevant and evaluable immune system. Veterinary oncologists working alongside oncologists and cancer researchers have the potential to advance discovery. Understanding the host-tumor-immune interactions can accelerate drug and biomarker discovery in a clinically relevant setting. This review presents discoveries in comparative immuno-oncology and implications to cancer therapy.

7 September 2023 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAudrey Shiner
Audrey Shiner
AKAlex Kiss
Alex Kiss
KSKhadijeh Saednia
Khadijeh Saednia
KJKatarzyna Jerzak
Katarzyna Jerzak
SGSonal Gandhi
Sonal Gandhi
WTWilliam Tyler Tran
William Tyler Tran
Up to 30% of breast cancer (BC) patients will develop distant metastases (DM), for which there is no cure. Here, statistical and machine learning (ML) models were developed to estimate the risk of site-specific DM following local-regional therapy. This retrospective study cohort included 175 patients diagnosed with invasive BC who later developed DM. Clinicopathological information was collected for analysis. Outcome variables were the first site of metastasis (brain, bone or visceral) and the time interval (months) to developing DM. Multivariate statistical analysis and ML-based multivariable gradient boosting machines identified factors associated with these outcomes. Machine learning models predicted the site of DM, demonstrating an area under the curve of 0.74, 0.75, and 0.73 for brain, bone and visceral sites, respectively. Overall, most patients (57%) developed bone metastases, with increased odds associated with estrogen receptor (ER) positivity. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positivity and non-anthracycline chemotherapy regimens were associated with a decreased risk of bone DM, while brain metastasis was associated with ER-negativity. Furthermore, non-anthracycline chemotherapy alone was a significant predictor of visceral metastasis. Here, clinicopathologic and treatment variables used in ML prediction models predict the first site of metastasis in BC. Further validation may guide focused patient-specific surveillance practices.