James Aegerter

Dr. James Aegerter


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRebecca Ellen Shipley
Rebecca Ellen Shipley
EWEdward Wright
Edward Wright
DSDavid Selden
David Selden
GWGuanghui Wu
Guanghui Wu
JAJames Aegerter
James Aegerter
ABAshley C Banyard
Ashley C Banyard
Bats in the EU have been associated with several zoonotic viral pathogens of significance to both human and animal health. Virus discovery continues to expand the existing understating of virus classification, and the increased interest in bats globally as reservoirs or carriers of zoonotic agents has fuelled the continued detection and characterisation of new lyssaviruses and other viral zoonoses. Although the transmission of lyssaviruses from bat species to humans or terrestrial species appears rare, interest in these viruses remains, through their ability to cause the invariably fatal encephalitis—rabies. The association of bats with other viral zoonoses is also of great interest. Much of the EU is free of terrestrial rabies, but several bat species harbor lyssaviruses that remain a risk to human and animal health. Whilst the rabies virus is the main cause of rabies globally, novel related viruses continue to be discovered, predominantly in bat populations, that are of interest purely through their classification within the lyssavirus genus alongside the rabies virus. Although the rabies virus is principally transmitted from the bite of infected dogs, these related lyssaviruses are primarily transmitted to humans and terrestrial carnivores by bats. Even though reports of zoonotic viruses from bats within the EU are rare, to protect human and animal health, it is important characterise novel bat viruses for several reasons, namely: (i) to investigate the mechanisms for the maintenance, potential routes of transmission, and resulting clinical signs, if any, in their natural hosts; (ii) to investigate the ability of existing vaccines, where available, to protect against these viruses; (iii) to evaluate the potential for spill over and onward transmission of viral pathogens in novel terrestrial hosts. This review is an update on the current situation regarding zoonotic virus discovery within bats in the EU, and provides details of potential future mechanisms to control the threat from these deadly pathogens.

17 January 2024 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCraig Ross
Craig Ross
ABAlexander Byrne
Alexander Byrne
SMSahar Mahmood
Sahar Mahmood
STSaumya S Thomas
Saumya S Thomas
SRScott Maclean Reid
Scott Maclean Reid
ABAshley C Banyard
Ashley C Banyard
The United Kingdom (UK) and Europe have seen successive outbreaks of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b high-pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV) since 2020 peaking in the autumn/winter periods. During the 2021/22 season, a mass die-off event of Svalbard Barnacle Geese (Branta leucopsis) was observed on the Solway Firth, a body of water on the west coast border between England and Scotland. This area is used annually by Barnacle Geese to over-winter, before returning to Svalbard to breed. Following initial identification of HPAIV in a Barnacle Goose on 8 November 2021, up to 32% of the total Barnacle Goose population may have succumbed to disease by the end of March 2022, along with other wild bird species in the area. Potential adaptation of the HPAIV to the Barnacle Goose population within this event was evaluated. Whole-genome sequencing of thirty-three HPAIV isolates from wild bird species demonstrated that there had been two distinct incursions of the virus, but the two viruses had remained genetically stable within the population, whilst viruses from infected wild birds were closely related to those from poultry cases occurring in the same region. Analysis of sera from the following year demonstrated that a high percentage (76%) of returning birds had developed antibodies to H5 AIV. This study demonstrates genetic stability of this strain of HPAIV in wild Anseriformes, and that, at the population scale, whilst there is a significant impact on survival, a high proportion of birds recover following infection.

1 October 2021 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFArran J Folly
Arran J Folly
DMDenise Marston
Denise Marston
MGMegan Golding
Megan Golding
Shweta ShuklaShweta Shukla
Shweta Shukla
RWRebekah Wilkie
Rebekah Wilkie
LMLorraine McElhinney
Lorraine McElhinney
Lyssaviruses are an important genus of zoonotic viruses which cause the disease rabies. The United Kingdom is free of classical rabies (RABV). However, bat rabies due to European bat lyssavirus 2 (EBLV-2), has been detected in Daubenton’s bats (Myotis daubentonii) in Great Britain since 1996, including a fatal human case in Scotland in 2002. Across Europe, European bat lyssavirus 1 (EBLV-1) is commonly associated with serotine bats (Eptesicus serotinus). Despite the presence of serotine bats across large parts of southern England, EBLV-1 had not previously been detected in this population. However, in 2018, EBLV-1 was detected through passive surveillance in a serotine bat from Dorset, England, using a combination of fluorescent antibody test, reverse transcription-PCR, Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis. Subsequent EBLV-1 positive serotine bats have been identified in South West England, again through passive surveillance, during 2018, 2019 and 2020. Here, we confirm details of seven cases of EBLV-1 and present similarities in genetic sequence indicating that emergence of EBLV-1 is likely to be recent, potentially associated with the natural movement of bats from the near continent

13 October 2020 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAlexandra Palmer
Alexandra Palmer
BGBeth Greenhough
Beth Greenhough
PHPru Hobson-West
Pru Hobson-West
RMReuben Message
Reuben Message
JAJames Aegerter
James Aegerter
SWSarah Wolfensohn
Sarah Wolfensohn
Research involving animals that occurs outside the laboratory raises an array of unique challenges. With regard to UK legislation, however, it receives only limited attention in terms of official guidelines, support, and statistics, which are unsurprisingly orientated towards the laboratory environment in which the majority of animal research takes place. In September 2019, four social scientists from the Animal Research Nexus program gathered together a group of 13 experts to discuss nonlaboratory research under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (A(SP)A) of 1986 (mirroring European Union (EU) Directive 2010/63/EU), which is the primary mechanism for regulating animal research in the UK. Such nonlaboratory research under the A(SP)A often occurs at Places Other than Licensed Establishments (POLEs). The primary objective of the workshop was to assemble a diverse group with experience across a variety of POLEs (e.g., wildlife field sites, farms, fisheries, veterinary clinics, zoos) to explore the practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges of conducting research at POLEs. While consensus was not sought, nor reached on every point of discussion, we collectively identified five key areas that we propose require further discussion and attention. These relate to: (1) support and training; (2) ethical review; (3) cultures of care, particularly in nonregulated research outside of the laboratory; (4) the setting of boundaries; and (5) statistics and transparency. The workshop generated robust discussion and thereby highlighted the value of focusing on the unique challenges posed by POLEs, and the need for further opportunities for exchanging experiences and sharing best practice relating to research projects outside of the laboratory in the UK and elsewhere.

7 October 2019 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
CBCarys Breeze
Carys Breeze
JAJames Aegerter
James Aegerter
GSGraham Smith
Graham Smith
Worldwide the 16 species of lyssaviruses all exhibit a similar pathology in most mammals, including man; with successful infections usually ending with death. Recently it has been demonstrated that European bat lyssaviruses (EBLV) are not invariably fatal in their wild reservoir host bat species, however the mechanisms and epidemiological consequences of this resistance are interesting and unexplored and the fundamental pathology in bats is still unclear. Here we modelled alternative pathological pathways to explore which appear most plausible, with respect to our limited knowledge of bat-rabies epidemiology and also host population dynamics. Two models were created, one based on a standard progression of disease (classic SEIR model) and the other modified to allow for animals to become either rabid or immune (flexible model). Of these our flexible model was found to be more plausible, demonstrating a much lower sensitivity to epidemiological parameters and by inference the more likely to represent the real-life process occurring in wild European bat populations, with a comparative state space ratio of 1:47. This result implies that it is highly probable survival and post-infection immunity is a widespread epidemiological phenomenon rather than an infrequent consequence of an aborted infection in few individuals. These results can be used to inform laboratory studies on bat immunology and future bat modelling work.

26 February 2026 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
SGSusannah Gold
Susannah Gold
SCSimon Croft
Simon Croft
RBRichard Budgey
Richard Budgey
JAJames Aegerter
James Aegerter
Bat populations experience inter-annual variation in demographic rates in response to environmental conditions. This variation has the potential to impact population sizes and structures, in addition to population-level processes such as disease spread. To establish the influence of variation in demography on these processes, we develop a spatial, individual based model of a serotine bat ( Eptesicus serotinus) population, within which we introduce a synthetic lyssavirus-like disease. Model results show that increasing demographic variation, particularly in survival rates, may drive substantial population decline in bat populations. Increasing environmental fluctuations driven by climate change may therefore be problematic for population persistence. The likelihood of disease persistence was also reduced by increasing variation. These findings highlight the limitations of only considering mean demographic rates for prediction of population size change and disease dynamics from models.