This essay introduces the political market framework (PMF) and discusses its implications for understanding local sustainability policy. The PMF conceptualizes public policy related to sustainability as the product of exchange between governmental policy suppliers and voter and interest group policy demanders. After presenting a political market model, the role of political institutions is introduced. Institutions structure exchange relationships by determining transaction costs of searching for mutually beneficial agreements, bargaining over outcomes, and monitoring and enforcing decisions. The central implication for research is the need to account for the moderating role that political institutions play in sustainability policy decisions. A research agenda based on the PMF is advanced. The conclusion addresses the limitations of the framework as well as its implications for policy adoptions, program designs, and individual behavior.

Regional governments and regional intergovernmental organizations play an increasingly important role in land use and transportation planning in many countries. In the U.S., regional organizations such as metropolitan planning organizations provide regional forums and institutions to coordinate actions of local government necessary to overcome collective action problems that result from the fragmentation of local authority. Their regional scope allows them to directly address collaboration problems or broker collaborative arrangements among local governments within their boundaries. Nevertheless, the scale of regional problems often extends beyond the boundaries of these regional entities. Thus, collaboration across regional governance organizations is necessary to address problems that have multi-regional impacts, such as large transportation projects. Extant research generally measures regional collaboration based on counts of collaboration actions undertaken, but this does not account for the fact that some are symbolic, while others require resources and commitment. Drawing insights from the institutional collective action framework, we advance an explanation for how regional organizations overcome collaboration risks to participate in collaborative solutions to regional and multi-regional problems. The analysis employs a unique national survey of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and adds a novel application of item response theory (IRT) to capture differences in risk or difficulty among collaborative actions. The IRT results offer support for our ICA-based explanation of collaboration commitments. The implications of the findings for theory development and empirical study of RIGOs are discussed in conclusion.

Local government managers play a critical role in sustainability and climate adaptation planning, and in relation to land-use policy, but little is known about how managers’ hazard risk concerns influence the implementation of resilience policy or how this relationship may vary across different landscapes and types of hazards. Linking managers’ disaster concerns to their planning choices is particularly relevant to resilience planning for adaptation to climate change, since greenhouse gas emissions are global but the harms produced by climate change are local. Moreover, climate adaptation planning encompasses risks from multiple hazards. For a sample of cities in the state of Florida, USA, we report the findings of empirical analysis of the relationships between local government managers’ hazard-specific climate-related disaster concerns and their resilience-planning priorities for four types of hazards: river flooding, sea-level rise, storm surge and hurricane/tornado winds. Drawing on data from a survey of local disaster managers and policy data on the implementation of adaptation-planning actions, the link between managers’ concerns and plan implementation is identified and compared across communities and across types of hazards. The pooled logit regression results reveal that the differences observed among these hazards persist even after controlling for objective risks and relevant community characteristics. We discuss the nature of the differences across four hazards and explore the implications of the findings for the literature on land use and climate adaptation and for the education of local government managers.

Local land use policies can shape the sustainability of urban systems, but integrated land use at the local level is challenging since it requires the coordination of multiple semi-independent agencies within cities to effectively address collective actions problems and overcome functional divisions. Although this problem is widely acknowledged, systematic examination of what factors are related to internal coordination of land use functions is lacking. This research investigates what influences the extent to which cities coordinate across functional areas to promote integrative land use decision making. I address this question by first describing a conceptual framework drawing from institutional collective action (ICA) perspectives to understand internal city collaboration across policy functions. I then advance explanations linking institutions and community characteristics to the degree of coordination in municipal land use. Using a 2015 survey of 1124 U.S. cities, I test the hypothesized relationships based on the functional institutional collective action framework. The findings reveal that political institutions, city operation of utilities, elected officials support, and fiscal capacity increase coordination. In conclusion the implications of the findings for theory and land use planning research are discussed.

The need for aligned policy responses to coordinate among governmental agencies is challenged by the “administrative silos” prevalent in government bureaucracy. How do collaboration risks influence the abilities of cities to effectively coordinate their efforts to address complex issues such as economic development, climate mitigation, and climate related disaster adaptation? Although coordination problems in the face of administrative silos are widely acknowledged, systematic examination of what accounts for variation in the extent to which local governments are able to successfully coordinate their functions to address complex problems are conspicuously absent from the literature. This research applies functional institutional collective action (ICA) theory to fill this lacuna. Problem uncertainty, actor’s political incentives, and institutions were hypothesized to influence successful coordination. Pooled GLM Probits were estimated with data from 1124 U.S. cities. Uncertainty inherent in specific types of problems, the characteristics of affected actors, and local and regional institutions influenced whether successful coordination among municipal departments was achieved. We conclude by identifying implications for collective action theory and for organizing and standard setting for sustainability policy.

This study investigates emotional patterns in state government disaster guideline documents using keyword-level emotion analysis and TF–IDF based topic modeling, framing disaster policy communication as an emotional–cognitive dual structure, drawing from Situational Crisis Communication Theory. The findings demonstrate a strong negative relationship between fear and neutrality, indicating a functional separation between risk awareness and administrative clarity. Nine topics were identified and organized into clusters centered on operational support, administrative structures, and policy frameworks, while content related to hazards and recovery emerged as a distinct semantic category based on cosine similarity analysis. In the integrated analysis of sentiment and topics, neutral language predominates, reflecting the cognitive dimension of government guidelines, with fear and sadness appearing as secondary but systematically patterned emotions. Fear concentrates in topics addressing hazardous conditions and risk-related content. Emotionally neutral language has traditionally been privileged in public administration, but the findings highlight disaster policy communication shaped by governance objectives that privilege specific emotional orientations aligned with coordination, participation, and risk management. State disaster guidelines function not only as technical instructions but also as structured communicative instruments that operate along a dual cognitive–emotional model, shaping public attention and response.