Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss

Prof. Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss

Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Materials Science and Engineering: A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Prashanth Konda GokuldossPrashanth Konda Gokuldoss
Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss
SSS. Scudino
S. Scudino
HKH.J. Klauss
H.J. Klauss
Kumar Babu SurreddiKumar Babu Surreddi
Kumar Babu Surreddi
LLL. Löber
L. Löber
JEJürgen Eckert
Jürgen Eckert

19 June 2017 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Prashanth Konda GokuldossPrashanth Konda Gokuldoss
Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss
SKSri Sudha Vijay Keshav Kolla
Sri Sudha Vijay Keshav Kolla
JEJürgen Eckert
Jürgen Eckert
Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing or rapid prototyping, is gaining increasing attention due to its ability to produce parts with added functionality and increased complexities in geometrical design, on top of the fact that it is theoretically possible to produce any shape without limitations. However, most of the research on additive manufacturing techniques are focused on the development of materials/process parameters/products design with different additive manufacturing processes such as selective laser melting, electron beam melting, or binder jetting. However, we do not have any guidelines that discuss the selection of the most suitable additive manufacturing process, depending on the material to be processed, the complexity of the parts to be produced, or the design considerations. Considering the very fact that no reports deal with this process selection, the present manuscript aims to discuss the different selection criteria that are to be considered, in order to select the best AM process (binder jetting/selective laser melting/electron beam melting) for fabricating a specific component with a defined set of material properties.

1 June 2017 in Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Prashanth Konda GokuldossPrashanth Konda Gokuldoss
Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss
JEJürgen Eckert
Jürgen Eckert

1 August 2016 in Acta Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJyoti Suryawanshi
Jyoti Suryawanshi
Prashanth Konda GokuldossPrashanth Konda Gokuldoss
Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss
SSS. Scudino
S. Scudino
JEJürgen Eckert
Jürgen Eckert
OPOm Prakash
Om Prakash
URU. Ramamurty
U. Ramamurty

9 March 2017 in Materials Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Prashanth Konda GokuldossPrashanth Konda Gokuldoss
Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss
SSS. Scudino
S. Scudino
TMTapabrata Maity
Tapabrata Maity
JDJAYANTA DAS
JAYANTA DAS
JEJürgen Eckert
Jürgen Eckert
The effective fabrication of materials using selective laser melting depends on the process parameters. Here, we analyse the suitability of the energy density to represent the energy transferred to the powder bed, which is effectively used to melt the particles and to produce the bulk specimens. By properly varying laser power and speed in order to process the powder at constant energy density, we show that the equation currently used to calculate the energy density gives only an approximate estimation and that hatch parameters and material properties should be considered to correctly evaluate the energy density. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT IMPACT STATEMENT Al-12Si SLM samples were fabricated at constant energy density. The laser power and laser scan speed combination variation was used to demonstrate the significant changes needed with energy density equation.

1 March 2017 in Acta Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Prashanth Konda GokuldossPrashanth Konda Gokuldoss
Prashanth Konda Gokuldoss
SSS. Scudino
S. Scudino
JEJürgen Eckert
Jürgen Eckert