Chiara Graziadio

Dr. Chiara Graziadio

Division of Endocrinology – AOU Federico II, Napoli - Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CVClaudia Vetrani
Claudia Vetrani
ANAndrea Di Nisio
Andrea Di Nisio
SPStavroula A. Paschou
Stavroula A. Paschou
Luigi BarreaLuigi Barrea
Luigi Barrea
GMGiovanna Muscogiuri
Giovanna Muscogiuri
OGon behalf of the Obesity Programs of Nutrition, Education, Research and Assessment (OPERA) Group
on behalf of the Obesity Programs of Nutrition, Education, Research and Assessment (OPERA) Group
During the last decades, the gut microbiota has gained much interest in relation to human health. Mounting evidence has shown a strict association between gut microbiota and obesity and its related diseases. Inflammation has been appointed as the driving force behind this association. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms by which gut microbiota might influence inflammation in the host could pave for the identification of effective strategies to reduce inflammation-related diseases, such as obesity and obesity-related diseases. For this purpose, we carried out an extensive literature search for studies published in the English language during the last 10 years. Most relevant studies were used to provide a comprehensive view of all aspects related to the association of gut microbiota and low-grade inflammation with obesity. Accordingly, this narrative review reports the evidence on the key players supporting the role of gut microbiota in the modulation of inflammation in relation to obesity and its complications. Moreover, therapeutic approaches to reduce microbiota-related inflammation are discussed to provide potential targets for future research.

24 April 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luigi BarreaLuigi Barrea
Luigi Barrea
Giovanna MuscogiuriGiovanna Muscogiuri
Giovanna Muscogiuri
GPGabriella Pugliese
Gabriella Pugliese
DLDaniela Laudisio
Daniela Laudisio
GAGiulia De Alteriis
Giulia De Alteriis
Silvia SavastanoSilvia Savastano
Silvia Savastano
Phase angle (PhA), a noninvasive bioimpedance marker, is a useful tool for nutritional screening in several diseases. C-reactive protein (CRP), a strong risk factor for metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, is a commonly used biomarker of meta-inflammation. As both PhA and CRP are influenced by age, BMI, and nutritional status, and exhibit a clear sex dimorphism, we examined the association between PhA and CRP levels in 1855 subjects (680 males and 1175 females), aged 18–59 years, with BMIs ranging from 19.5 to 69.4 kg/m2, stratified according to sex. PhA values and CRP levels were significantly lower in females than males (p < 0.001), while the adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) was lower in males compared to females (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, physical activity, BMI, waist circumference, and adherence to the MD, PhA remained negatively associated with CRP levels in both genders (p < 0.001). In the ROC analysis, PhA ≤ 5.5° in males and ≤5.4° in females were the threshold values predicting increased hs-CRP levels. These results suggested that PhA might represent a valid predictor of CRP levels in both sexes regardless of body weight and adherence to the MD, which avoids the collection of blood sampling and expensive biochemical assays.

19 November 2022 in Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ICI. R. Cincione
I. R. Cincione
CGChiara Graziadio
Chiara Graziadio
FMF. Marino Marino
F. Marino Marino
CVClaudia Vetrani
Claudia Vetrani
FLF. Losavio
F. Losavio
DLDaniela Laudisio
Daniela Laudisio

10 April 2023 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luigi BarreaLuigi Barrea
Luigi Barrea
CVClaudia Vetrani
Claudia Vetrani
LVLudovica Verde
Ludovica Verde
Evelyn Frias-ToralEvelyn Frias-Toral
Evelyn Frias-Toral
FCFlorencia Ceriani
Florencia Ceriani
Giovanna MuscogiuriGiovanna Muscogiuri
Giovanna Muscogiuri
In the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), diet plays a key role. Individualized medical nutritional therapy, as part of lifestyle optimization, is one of the cornerstones for the management of T2DM and has been shown to improve metabolic outcomes. This paper discusses major aspects of the nutritional intervention (including macro- and micronutrients, nutraceuticals, and supplements), with key practical advice. Various eating patterns, such as the Mediterranean-style, low-carbohydrate, vegetarian or plant-based diets, as well as healthy eating plans with caloric deficits have been proven to have beneficial effects for patients with T2DM. So far, the evidence does not support a specific macronutrient distribution and meal plans should be individualized. Reducing the overall carbohydrate intake and replacing high glycemic index (GI) foods with low GI foods have been shown as valid options for patients with T2DM to improve glycemic control. Additionally, evidence supports the current recommendation to reduce the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake, since their excessive intake promotes weight gain. The quality of fats seems to be rather important and the substitution of saturated and trans fatty acids with foods rich in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats lowers cardiovascular risk and improves glucose metabolism. There is no benefit of supplementation with antioxidants, such as carotene, vitamins E and C, or other micronutrients, due to the lack of consistent evidence showing efficacy and long-term safety. Some studies suggest possible beneficial metabolic effects of nutraceuticals in patients with T2DM, but more evidence about their efficacy and safety is still needed.

14 May 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luigi BarreaLuigi Barrea
Luigi Barrea
Giovanna MuscogiuriGiovanna Muscogiuri
Giovanna Muscogiuri
GPGabriella Pugliese
Gabriella Pugliese
CGChiara Graziadio
Chiara Graziadio
Maria MaistoMaria Maisto
Maria Maisto
Silvia SavastanoSilvia Savastano
Silvia Savastano
Individual differences in the chronotype, an attitude that best expresses the individual circadian preference in behavioral and biological rhythms, have been associated with cardiometabolic risk and gut dysbiosis. Up to now, there are no studies evaluating the association between chronotypes and circulating TMAO concentrations, a predictor of cardiometabolic risk and a useful marker of gut dysbiosis. In this study population (147 females and 100 males), subjects with the morning chronotype had the lowest BMI and waist circumference (p < 0.001), and a better metabolic profile compared to the other chronotypes. In addition, the morning chronotype had the highest adherence to the Mediterranean diet (p < 0.001) and the lowest circulating TMAO concentrations (p < 0.001). After adjusting for BMI and adherence to the Mediterranean diet, the correlation between circulating TMAO concentrations and chronotype score was still kept (r = −0.627, p < 0.001). Using a linear regression analysis, higher chronotype scores were mostly associated with lower circulating TMAO concentrations (β = −0.479, t = −12.08, and p < 0.001). Using a restricted cubic spline analysis, we found that a chronotype score ≥59 (p < 0.001, R2 = −0.824) demonstrated a more significant inverse linear relationship with circulating TMAO concentrations compared with knots <59 (neither chronotype) and <41 (evening chronotype). The current study reported the first evidence that higher circulating TMAO concentrations were associated with the evening chronotype that, in turn, is usually linked to an unhealthy lifestyle mostly characterized by low adherence to the MD.

3 August 2018 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGChiara Graziadio
Chiara Graziadio
VHValeria Hasenmajer
Valeria Hasenmajer
MARY ANNA VENNERIMARY ANNA VENNERI
MARY ANNA VENNERI
DGDaniele Gianfrilli
Daniele Gianfrilli
AIAndrea M. Isidori
Andrea M. Isidori
ESEmilia Sbardella
Emilia Sbardella
Secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) is a potentially life-threatening endocrine disorder due to an impairment of corticotropin (ACTH) secretion from any process affecting the hypothalamus or pituitary gland. ACTH deficit can be isolated or associated with other pituitary failures (hypopituitarism). An increased mortality due to cardiovascular, metabolic, and infectious diseases has been described in both primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency. However, few studies have provided compelling evidences on the underlying mechanism in SAI, because of the heterogeneity of the condition. Recently, some studies suggested that inappropriate glucocorticoid (GCs) replacement therapy, as for dose and/or timing of administration, may play a role. Hypertension, insulin resistance, weight gain, visceral obesity, increased body mass index, metabolic syndrome, impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia have all been associated with GC excess. These conditions are particularly significant when SAI coexists with other pituitary alterations, such as growth hormone deficiency, hypogonadism, and residual tumor. Novel regimen schemes and GC preparations have been introduced to improve compliance and better mimick endogenous cortisol rhythm. The controlled trials on the improved replacement therapies, albeit in the short-term, show some beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk, glucose metabolism, and quality of life. This review examines the current evidence from the available clinical trials investigating the association between different glucocorticoid replacement therapies (type, dose, frequency, and timing of treatment) and glycometabolic alterations in SAI.