Objective To determine whether live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine (YFV) was associated with MS relapse, we evaluated the clinical courses of 23 patients in the year before and the year after immunization at the university hospital of Geneva, Switzerland. Methods This self-controlled retrospective cohort included adult patients with MS receiving YFV between 2014 and 2018 and defined the year before vaccination, the 3 months thereafter, and the 9 months following as the pre-exposure (PEP), exposure-risk (ERP), and postrisk (PRP) periods, respectively. The primary outcome was the relative incidence of relapse in the ERP vs the PEP. Secondary end points included the presence of new T2-weighted (T2) or T1-weighted gadolinium-positive (T1Gd+) MRI lesions. Results Of 23 patients with MS receiving YFV (20 relapsing MS and 3 primary progressive MS), 17 (74%) were women; mean age was 34 years (SD ±10); and 10 of 23 (40%) were treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Although 9 patients experienced 12 relapses in the PEP, only one experienced a relapse in the ERP; 3 other patients experienced one relapse each in the PRP. None of the 8 patients receiving natalizumab at the time of vaccination experienced relapse thereafter. In the PEP, ERP, and PRP, 18, 2, and 9 patients had new brain and/or spinal cord lesions on T2 or T1Gd + MRI, respectively. Conclusions In this cohort, YF vaccination was associated with neither an increase in MS relapse nor emergence of brain and/or spinal lesions. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Classification of evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for persons with MS, YFV may not increase relapse risk.

Strongyloides stercoralis, causative agent of a neglected tropical disease, is a soil-transmitted helminth which may cause lifelong persisting infection due to continuous autoinfection. In the case of immunosuppression, life-threatening hyperinfection and disseminated strongyloidiasis can develop. We propose a pragmatic screening algorithm for latent strongyloidiasis based on epidemiologic exposure and immunosuppression status that can be applied for any kind of immunosuppressive therapy. The algorithm allows the diagnosis of latent strongyloidiasis with optimal accuracy in a well-equipped setting, while for endemic settings where the complete testing array is unavailable, an empiric treatment is generally recommended. Accurate diagnosis and extensive empiric treatment will both contribute to decreasing the current neglect of strongyloidiasis.

Background: Nasopharyngeal antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs), saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-PCR have shown different performance characteristics to detect patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, according to the viral load (VL)—and thus transmissibility. Methods: In October 2020, we conducted a prospective trial involving patients presenting at testing centres with symptoms of COVID-19. We compared detection rates and performance of RDT, saliva PCR and nasopharyngeal (NP) PCR, according to VL and symptoms duration. Results: Out of 949 patients enrolled, 928 patients had all three tests performed. Detection rates were 35.2% (95%CI 32.2–38.4%) by RDT, 39.8% (36.6–43.0%) by saliva PCR, 40.1% (36.9–43.3%) by NP PCR, and 41.5% (38.3–44.7%) by any test. For those with viral loads (VL) ≥10⁶ copies/ml, detection rates were 30.3% (27.3–33.3), 31.4% (28.4–34.5), 31.5% (28.5–34.6), and 31.6% (28.6–34.7%) respectively. Sensitivity of RDT compared to NP PCR was 87.4% (83.6–90.6%) for all positive patients, 94.5% (91.5–96.7%) for those with VL≥10⁵ and 96.5% (93.6–98.3%) for those with VL≥10⁶. Sensitivity of STANDARD-Q^®, Panbio™ and COVID-VIRO^® Ag tests were 92.9% (86.4–96.9%), 86.1% (78.6–91.7%) and 84.1% (76.9–89.7%), respectively. For those with VL≥10⁶, sensitivity was 96.6% (90.5–99.3%), 97.8% (92.1–99.7%) and 95.3% (89.4–98.5%) respectively. No patient with VL<10⁴ was detected by RDT. Specificity of RDT was 100% (99.3–100%) compared to any PCR. RDT sensitivity was similar <4 days (87.8%, 83.5–91.3%) and ≥4 days (85.7%, 75.9–92.6%) after symptoms onset (p = 0.6). Sensitivity of saliva and NP PCR were 95.7% (93.1–97.5%) and 96.5% (94.1–98.1%), respectively, compared to the other PCR. Conclusions: RDT results allow rapid identification of COVID cases with immediate isolation of most contagious individuals. RDT can thus be a game changer both in ambulatory care and community testing aimed at stopping transmission chains, and even more so in resource-constrained settings thanks to its very low price. When PCR is performed, saliva could replace NP swabbing. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04613310 (03/11/2020).

Rothia dentocariosa is part of the normal human oropharyngeal microflora and is frequently associated with dental caries and periodontal disease. Invasive disease has been described essentially in immunocompromised hosts and/or patients with underlying conditions as predisposing factors. We present a case of an otherwise healthy 46-years old male with spondylodiscitis caused by this pathogen. Treatment with ceftriaxone and rifampin was successful. To our knowledge, this is the first R. dentocariosa spondylodiscitis reported in an immunocompetent patient, and the second one in the literature overall.

Recently a number of broad-range stool parasite PCR assays have been developed. However, there is ongoing disagreement regarding their diagnostic performance, as various studies have produced contradictory results. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of the Seegene Allplex GI-Parasite and Allplex GI-Helminth assays (SA) with the conventional methods used at the travel clinic of the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM) including microscopy, antigen testing, and molecular detection in order to provide insights into the strengths and limitations of this diagnostic tool which may be crucial to select the most appropriate diagnostic tools for the suspected pathogen. A total of 97 native stool samples from 95 patients with suspected gastrointestinal illness were analyzed, including 26 from a frozen collection and 71 prospectively collected samples. The diagnostic performance of SA was notably superior to the conventional workflow in detecting Dientamoeba fragilis (sensitivity 100% vs. 47.4%) and Blastocystis hominis (sensitivity 95% vs. 77.5%). SA had a comparable performance with the conventional workflow in detecting pathogenic protozoa (sensitivity 90% vs. 95%). In contrast, SA had a much lower diagnostic performance in detecting helminths (59.1%) compared to the conventional workflow (100%). We conclude that the Seegene Allplex GI-Parasite assay may be useful for protozoa screening in low-endemic industrialized countries. However, the Allplex GI-Helminth assay is not recommended due to its suboptimal performance compared to microscopy.

No studies assessing rabies vaccine (RV) tolerability in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) have been conducted. Given the lack of safety data, RV is recommended essentially only for post-exposure prophylaxis, which is difficult to administer effectively in many rabies-endemic countries. We sought to determine whether RV administration as pre-exposure prophylaxis was associated with MS relapse. This retrospective cohort study compared the clinical courses of MS patients in the year before and after rabies vaccination. The year before vaccination was defined as the pre-exposure risk period, the three months thereafter as the exposure-risk period, and the following nine months as the post-risk period. All adult MS patients immunized with RV between 2014 and 2018 and with available medical records in the two-year window were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic MS relapse in the exposure-risk period versus the pre-exposure period. Fifty-five patients received at least one dose of RV. Most (38/55, 69%) were female; mean age was 38.5 years (SD ±9.2). While 21 (38%) patients experienced 24 relapses in the year before vaccination, only three (5%) experienced one relapse each in the post-vaccination exposure-risk period; three others (5%) experienced a total of four relapses in the subsequent post-risk period. The annualized relapse rates in the pre-exposure, exposure-risk, and post-risk periods were 0.44, 0.22, and 0.10, respectively (rate ratio for exposure-risk to pre-exposure periods, 0.509 [95% CI 0.098-1.677]). In this cohort, rabies vaccination was not associated with clinical MS relapse. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.