Vascular calcification commonly associated with several pathologies and it has been suggested to be similar to bone mineralization. The axis RANKL-OPG (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand–osteoprotegerin) finely controls bone turnover. RANKL has been suggested to increase vascular calcification, but direct evidence is missing. Thus, in the present work, we assess the effect of RANKL in vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) calcification. VSMCs incubated with RANKL showed a dose-dependent increase in calcification, which was abolished by coincubation with OPG. To test whether the effect was mediated by signaling to its receptor, knockdown of RANK was accomplished by short hairpin (sh)RNA. Indeed, cells lacking RANK showed no increases in vascular calcification when incubated with RANKL. To further elucidate the mechanism by which RANK activation increases calcification, we blocked both nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation pathways. Only IKKα inactivation inhibited calcification, pointing to an involvement of the alternative NF-κB activation pathway. Furthermore, RANKL addition increased bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)4 expression in VSMCs, and that increase disappeared in cells lacking RANK or IKKα. The increase in calcification was also blunted by Noggin, pointing to a mediation of BMP4 in the calcification induced by RANKL. Furthermore, in an in vivo model, the increase in vascular calcium content was parallel to an increase in RANKL and BMP4 expression, which was localized in calcified areas. However, blood levels of the ratio RANKL/OPG did not change. We conclude that RANKL increases vascular smooth muscle cell calcification by binding to RANK and increasing BMP4 production through activation of the alternative NF-κB pathway.

We tested the effects of calcitriol and its analog paricalcitol on VSMC calcification in vitro and in vivo. For that reason, cells and animals with five-sixths nephrectomy were treated with both compounds. Calcitriol, but not paricalcitol, increased VSMC calcification in vitro and in vivo independently of calcium and phosphate levels. This increase in calcification was parallel to an increase in the RANKL/OPG ratio. Introduction: Vascular calcification is a common finding in patients with endstage renal disease. Furthermore, those patients often present secondary hyperparathyroidism, partly because of a decrease of calcitriol synthesis on the kidney. Thus, one of the main therapeutic options is to treat those patients with calcitriol or analogs. However, this treatment presents unwanted side effects, such as increases in vascular calcification. Materials and Methods: We tested the effect on vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) calcification of calcitriol and one of its analogs, paricalcitol, in vitro and in vivo in animals with endstage renal disease. Results: Calcitriol increased calcification of VSMCs cultured in calcification media. This effect was not present when cells were incubated with paricalcitol. Furthermore, only cells incubated with calcitriol showed an increased RANKL/ osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression. Animals with renal failure treated with hypercalcemic doses of calcitriol and paricalcitol showed an increase in systolic blood pressure. However, diastolic blood pressure only raised significantly in those animals treated with paricalcitol. This effect led to a significant increase in pulse pressure in animals treated with calcitriol. The increase in pulse pressure was likely caused by the extensive calcification observed in arteries of animals treated with calcitriol. This increase in calcification was not seen in arteries of animals treated with paricalcitol, despite having similar levels of serum calcium and phosphorus as animals treated with calcitriol. Furthermore, the decreases in serum PTH levels were similar in both treatments. Conclusions: We conclude that paricalcitol has a different effect than calcitriol in VSMC calcification and that this could explain part of the differences observed in the clinical settings.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Although screening programs have reduced mortality rates, there is a need for research focused on finding the main factors that lead primary CRC to progress and metastasize. During tumor progression, malignant cells modify their habitat, corrupting or transforming cells of different origins and creating the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cells forming the TME like macrophages, neutrophils, and fibroblasts generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that modify the cancer niche. The effects of ROS in cancer are very diverse: they promote cellular proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), evasion of cell death programs, migration, and angiogenesis. Due to the multifaceted role of ROS in cancer cell survival and function, ROS-modulating agents such as antioxidants or pro-oxidants could have therapeutic potential in cancer prevention and/or as a complement to systemic treatments. In this review, we will examine the main ROS producer cells and their effects on cancer progression and metastasis. Furthermore, we will enumerate the latest clinical trials where pro-oxidants and antioxidants have therapeutic uses in CRC.