Yulia Zhuravleva

Dr. Yulia Zhuravleva

Institute of Immunology and Physiology of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evgenii Yurievich GusevEvgenii Yurievich Gusev
Evgenii Yurievich Gusev
YZYulia Zhuravleva
Yulia Zhuravleva
Pro-inflammatory stress is inherent in any cells that are subject to damage or threat of damage. It is defined by a number of universal components, including oxidative stress, cellular response to DNA damage, unfolded protein response to mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress, changes in autophagy, inflammasome formation, non-coding RNA response, formation of an inducible network of signaling pathways, and epigenetic changes. The presence of an inducible receptor and secretory phenotype in many cells is the cause of tissue pro-inflammatory stress. The key phenomenon determining the occurrence of a classical inflammatory focus is the microvascular inflammatory response (exudation, leukocyte migration to the alteration zone). This same reaction at the systemic level leads to the development of life-critical systemic inflammation. From this standpoint, we can characterize the common mechanisms of pathologies that differ in their clinical appearance. The division of inflammation into alternative variants has deep evolutionary roots. Evolutionary aspects of inflammation are also described in the review. The aim of the review is to provide theoretical arguments for the need for an up-to-date theory of the relationship between key human pathological processes based on the integrative role of the molecular mechanisms of cellular and tissue pro-inflammatory stress.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evgenii Yurievich GusevEvgenii Yurievich Gusev
Evgenii Yurievich Gusev
LSLiliya V. Solomatina
Liliya V. Solomatina
YZYulia Zhuravleva
Yulia Zhuravleva
ASAlexey Sarapultsev
Alexey Sarapultsev
Chronic kidney disease can progress to end-stage chronic renal disease (ESRD), which requires the use of replacement therapy (dialysis or kidney transplant) in life-threatening conditions. In ESRD, irreversible changes in the kidneys are associated with systemic changes of proinflammatory nature and dysfunctions of internal organs, skeletal muscles, and integumentary tissues. The common components of ESRD pathogenesis, regardless of the initial nosology, are (1) local (in the kidneys) and systemic chronic low-grade inflammation (ChLGI) as a risk factor for diabetic kidney disease and its progression to ESRD, (2) inflammation of the classical type characteristic of primary and secondary autoimmune glomerulonephritis and infectious recurrent pyelonephritis, as well as immune reactions in kidney allograft rejection, and (3) chronic systemic inflammation (ChSI), pathogenetically characterized by latent microcirculatory disorders and manifestations of paracoagulation. The development of ChSI is closely associated with programmed hemodialysis in ESRD, as well as with the systemic autoimmune process. Consideration of ESRD pathogenesis from the standpoint of the theory of general pathological processes opens up the scope not only for particular but also for universal approaches to conducting pathogenetic therapies and diagnosing and predicting systemic complications in severe nephropathies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Natalya Vladimirovna ZotovaNatalya Vladimirovna Zotova
Natalya Vladimirovna Zotova
YZYulia Zhuravleva
Yulia Zhuravleva
VCValeriy Chereshnev
Valeriy Chereshnev
Evgenii Yurievich GusevEvgenii Yurievich Gusev
Evgenii Yurievich Gusev
Currently, there is rationale for separating the systemic manifestations of classical inflammation from systemic inflammation (SI) itself as an independent form of the general pathological process underlying the pathogenesis of the most severe acute and chronic diseases. With this aim in view, we used integral scales of acute and chronic SI (ChSI), including the following blood plasma parameters: interleukins 6, 8, 10; tumor necrosis factor alpha; C-reactive protein; D-dimer; cortisol; troponin I; myoglobin. The presence of multiple organ dysfunction according to the SOFA score was also taken into account. The effectiveness of the scales was tested in groups of intensive care patients during different periods of acute trauma, sepsis, and septic shock. The ChSI scale was applicable under systemic autoimmune diseases, chronic purulent infections, chronic limb threatening ischemia, and end-stage renal disease of various genesis. The number of examined patients was 764 in total. The scales allowed us to verify specific phases of acute SI and identify pathogenetic risk factors of lethal outcomes, as well as the most severe variants of the chronic pathologies course. These scales are open adaptable systems (in terms of the nomenclature and choice of indicators). They are primarily intended for scientific research. However, the SI verification methodology presented in this paper may be useful for developing advanced criteria for assessing both the typical links in the pathogenesis of many diseases and the severity of the overall condition of patients for clinical practice.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evgenii Yurievich GusevEvgenii Yurievich Gusev
Evgenii Yurievich Gusev
ASAlexey Sarapultsev
Alexey Sarapultsev
YZYulia Zhuravleva
Yulia Zhuravleva
Insulin resistance (IR) is a central driver of cardiometabolic disease and an increasingly recognized modifier of inflammatory and vascular pathology. Beyond impaired glucose homeostasis, IR emerges from chronic, metabolically induced inflammation (“meta-inflammation”) and convergent cellular stress programs that propagate across tissues and organ systems, ultimately shaping endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis, and cardiometabolic complications. Here, we synthesize multilevel links between insulin receptor signaling, intracellular stress modules (oxidative, endoplasmic reticulum, inflammatory, and fibrotic pathways), tissue-level dysfunction, and systemic inflammatory amplification. This work is a conceptual narrative review informed by targeted database searches and citation tracking, with explicit separation of mechanistic/experimental evidence from human observational and interventional data; causal inferences are framed primarily on mechanistic and interventional findings, whereas associative statements are reserved for observational evidence. We propose an integrative framework in which stress-response pathways are context-dependent and become maladaptive when chronically activated under nutrient excess and persistent inflammatory cues, generating self-reinforcing loops between IR and inflammation that accelerate vascular injury. This framework highlights points of convergence that can guide mechanistic prioritization and translational hypothesis testing.

31 January 2020 in Medical Immunology (Russia)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Evgenii Yurievich GusevEvgenii Yurievich Gusev
Evgenii Yurievich Gusev
Natalya Vladimirovna ZotovaNatalya Vladimirovna Zotova
Natalya Vladimirovna Zotova
YZYulia Zhuravleva
Yulia Zhuravleva
VCV. A. Chereshnev
V. A. Chereshnev
The scavenger receptors (SRs)) include > 30 different molecules structurally classified into 11 classes (A to L). They are expressed mostly on stromal macrophages, and their expression may be augmented in direct dependence with concentrations of their ligands. The SRs are heterogenous by their structure, however, being common in their functional potential. E.g., different SR classes may participate in absorption of modified low-density lipoproteins and glycated proteins, apoptotic and ageing cells, altered erythrocytes and platelets, like as a big variety of other endogenous ligands from metabolic and cellular “trash”. A common property of SRs is their participation in removal of small pathogen amounts from blood circulation, regulation of cell and tissue stress responses, ability to form complicated receptor complexes with other receptor types including integrins and toll-like receptors. Opposite to classic pattern-recognizing receptors, the SR involvement does not always elicit a pronounced cellular activation and development of pro-inflammatory cellular stress. The SR functional effects provide interactions between different physiological events and immune system, including the processes of neuroendocrine and metabolic regulation. These mechanisms provide both homeostatic stability and, likewise, act at the border of normal and pathological conditions, i.e., participating in pathogenesis of transitional processes, e.g., physiological ageing. Moreover, the SR-associated processes represent a key pathogenetic factor in different somatic diseases, e.g., those associated with low-intensity chronic inflammation, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, arterial hypertension, various neurodegenerative disorders. Similarly, the SRs are involved into the processes of cancer transformation and antitumor response, different processes of classical inflammation, from antigen presentation to the morphofunctional T cell and macrophage polarization in the inflammation foci and immunocompetent organs. SR are playing a controversial role in development of acute systemic inflammation, the main reason for lethal outcomes in the intensive care wards. Targeted effects upon the SRs represent a promising approach when treating a broad variety of diseases, whereas detection of membrane-bound and soluble SR forms could be performed by means of diagnostic and monitoring techniques in many human disorders.

1 January 2020 in General Physiology and Biophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NZNatalia V. Zotova
Natalia V. Zotova
YZYulia Zhuravleva
Yulia Zhuravleva
TZTatyana E. Zubova
Tatyana E. Zubova
Evgenii Yurievich GusevEvgenii Yurievich Gusev
Evgenii Yurievich Gusev
Integral estimation of systemic inflammatory response under sepsis