Michael Barnes

Dr. Michael Barnes

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Child Abuse & Neglect
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAliceAnn Crandall
AliceAnn Crandall
EBEliza Broadbent
Eliza Broadbent
MSMelissa Stanfill
Melissa Stanfill
BMBrianna M. Magnusson
Brianna M. Magnusson
MNM. Lelinneth B. Novilla
M. Lelinneth B. Novilla
MBMichael Barnes
Michael Barnes

1 April 2008 in American Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael Barnes
Michael Barnes
CHCarl L. Hanson
Carl L. Hanson
LNLen M. B. Novilla
Len M. B. Novilla
AMAaron T. Meacham
Aaron T. Meacham
EMEmily McIntyre
Emily McIntyre
BEBrittany C. Erickson
Brittany C. Erickson
Media agenda setting refers to the deliberate coverage of topics or events with the goal of influencing public opinion and public policy. We conducted a quantitative content analysis of 4 prominent newspapers to examine how the media gathered and distributed news to shape public policy priorities during Hurricane Katrina. The media framed most Hurricane Katrina stories by emphasizing government response and less often addressing individuals’ and communities’ level of preparedness or responsibility. Hence, more articles covered response and recovery than mitigation and preparation. The newspapers studied focused significantly more on government response than on key public health roles in disaster management. We discuss specific implications for public health professionals, policymakers, and mass media so that, in the future, coordination can be enhanced among these entities before, during, and after disasters occur.

1 January 2020 in INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMichael Barnes
Michael Barnes
CHCarl L Hanson
Carl L Hanson
LNLen B. Novilla
Len B. Novilla
BMBrianna M. Magnusson
Brianna M. Magnusson
ACAliceAnn Crandall
AliceAnn Crandall
GBGracie Bradford
Gracie Bradford
Communities and populations are comprised of individuals and families who together affect the health of the community. The family unit is an unparalleled player for maintaining health and preventing disease for public health because members may support and nurture one another through life stages. Preliminary research confirms that family-oriented health promotion and disease prevention are promising strategies because the family unit is both a resource and a priority group needing preventative and curative services across the life course. Although there are growing numbers of successful efforts, family health systems are generally underutilized in health promotion practice. This lack of utilization in policy and practice have hampered the collection of robust evidence for family health. This paper purports that families are important actors in public health. Yet, since no one pattern for healthy families is known, public health practitioners can consider six principle-based approaches to legitimately and respectfully advance the families’ innate potential for health promotion and disease prevention. Each perspective aims to foster higher capacity for family health systems to function appropriately in public health practice. Health promotion practitioners and researchers can explore family health perspectives with the potential for systems policy and practice adjustments in public health.

EREmma M. Reese
Emma M. Reese
MBMelissa Jane Barlow
Melissa Jane Barlow
MDMaddison Dillon
Maddison Dillon
SVSariah Villalon
Sariah Villalon
MBMichael Barnes
Michael Barnes
ACAliceAnn Crandall
AliceAnn Crandall
Family health is important to the well-being of individual family members and the collective family unit, and as such, may serve as a mediator for the intergenerational transmission of trauma (ITT). This study aimed to understand the intergenerational impact of parent’s adverse and positive childhood experiences (ACEs and PCEs) on their children’s adverse family experiences (AFEs) and how family health mediated those relationships. The sample consisted of 482 heterosexual married or cohabiting couples (dyads) in the United States who had a child between the ages of 3 and 13 years old. Each member of the dyad completed a survey, and data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Parental ACEs were associated with more AFEs. The fathers’, but not the mothers’, ACEs were associated with worse family health. Parental PCEs were associated with better family health, and family health was associated with lower AFE scores. Indirect effects indicated that parental PCEs decreased AFEs through their impact on family health. Family health also mediated the relationship between the father’s ACEs and the child’s AFEs. Interventions designed to support family health may help decrease child AFEs.

15 July 2016 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMichael Barnes
Michael Barnes
THThomas Heaton
Thomas Heaton
MGMichael Goates
Michael Goates
JPJustin M. Packer
Justin M. Packer
The developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) theory and life course theory (LCT) are emerging fields of research that have significant implications for the public health and health promotion professions. Using a DOHaD/LCT perspective, social determinants of health (SDH) take on new critical meaning by which health promotion professionals can implement DOHaD/LCT guided interventions, including recommended policies. Through these interventions, public health could further address the sources of worldwide chronic disease epidemics and reduce such disease rates substantially if related policy, programs, and interdisciplinary and multi-sector collaboration are emphasized. Additional characteristics of the most effective interventions involve context-specific adaptation and societal structures that impact upstream, early life environments on a broad scale, influencing multiple locations and/or diseases.

1 January 2003 in Journal of Health Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael Barnes
Michael Barnes
CPChristy Penrod
Christy Penrod
BNBrad L. Neiger
Brad L. Neiger
RMRay M. Merrill
Ray M. Merrill
RTRosemary Thackeray
Rosemary Thackeray
ETEvan Thomas
Evan Thomas
This study identified the criteria that are valued among Internet users when rating and accessing health information on the World Wide Web. Participants (N = 578) successfully completed a Web-based survey by ranking 12 criteria for evaluating health information. Then, by applying those same evaluation criteria, rated the quality of three preselected health-related websites and indicated their preference for one of the three sites. Six criteria including content, design and aesthetics, currency of information and contact addresses were significant predictors for selecting high-quality health information on the Internet. However, compared to their perceived importance, participants' perceptions about quality health information on the Internet were not consistent when selecting quality websites. This study identified the implications for evaluation criteria among Internet users, health professionals and website developers.