Tali Bitan

Prof. Tali Bitan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2007 in Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames R. Booth
James R. Booth
LWLydia Wood
Lydia Wood
DLDong Lu
Dong Lu
JHJames C. Houk
James C. Houk
TBTali Bitan
Tali Bitan

1 January 2008 in Neuropsychologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDouglas D. Burman
Douglas D. Burman
TBTali Bitan
Tali Bitan
JBJames R. Booth
James R. Booth

26 October 2006 in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FCFan Cao
Fan Cao
TBTali Bitan
Tali Bitan
TCTai‐Li Chou
Tai‐Li Chou
DBDouglas D. Burman
Douglas D. Burman
JBJames R. Booth
James R. Booth

1 June 2005 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBTali Bitan
Tali Bitan
JBJames R. Booth
James R. Booth
JCJanet Choy
Janet Choy
DBDouglas D. Burman
Douglas D. Burman
DGDarren Gitelman
Darren Gitelman
MMM.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine task-specific modulations of effective connectivity within a left-hemisphere language network during spelling and rhyming judgments on visually presented words. We identified sites showing task-specific activations for rhyming in the lateral temporal cortex (LTC) and for spelling in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and fusiform gyrus were engaged by both tasks. Dynamic causal modeling showed that each task preferentially strengthened modulatory influences converging on its task-specific site (LTC for rhyming, IPS for spelling). These remarkably selective and symmetrical findings demonstrate that the nature of the behavioral task dynamically shifts the locus of integration (or convergence) to the network component specialized for that task. Furthermore, they suggest that the role of the task-selective areas is to provide a differential synthesis of incoming information rather than providing differential control signals influencing the activity of other network components. Our findings also showed that switching tasks led to changes in the target area influenced by the IFG, suggesting that the IFG may play a pivotal role in setting the cognitive context for each task. We propose that task-dependent shifts in effective connectivity are likely to be mediated through top-down modulations from the IFG to the task-selective regions in a way that differentially enhances their sensitivity to incoming word-form information.

1 November 2008 in Brain and Language
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFan Cao
Fan Cao
TBTali Bitan
Tali Bitan
JBJames R. Booth
James R. Booth

1 June 2009 in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTali Bitan
Tali Bitan
JCJimmy Cheon
Jimmy Cheon
DLDong Lu
Dong Lu
DBDouglas D. Burman
Douglas D. Burman
JBJames R. Booth
James R. Booth
We examined age-related changes in the interactions among brain regions in children performing rhyming judgments on visually presented words. The difficulty of the task was manipulated by including a conflict between task-relevant (phonological) information and task-irrelevant (orthographic) information. The conflicting conditions included pairs of words that rhyme despite having different spelling patterns (jazz–has), or words that do not rhyme despite having similar spelling patterns (pint–mint). These were contrasted with nonconflicting pairs that have similar orthography and phonology (dime–lime) or different orthography and phonology (press–list). Using fMRI, we examined effective connectivity among five left hemisphere regions of interest: fusiform gyrus (FG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), intraparietal sulcus (IPS), lateral temporal cortex (LTC), and medial frontal gyrus (MeFG). Age-related increases were observed in the influence of the IFG and FG on the LTC, but only in conflicting conditions. These results reflect a developmental increase in the convergence of bottom–up and top–down information on the LTC. In older children, top–down control process may selectively enhance the sensitivity of the LTC to bottom–up information from the FG. This may be evident especially in situations that require selective enhancement of task-relevant versus task-irrelevant information. Altogether these results provide a direct evidence for a developmental increase in top–down control processes in language processing. The developmental increase in bottom–up processing may be secondary to the enhancement of top–down processes.