Aravindhan Veerapandiyan

Dr. Aravindhan Veerapandiyan

Pediatric Neurology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, 1 Children’s Way, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 October 2024 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJerry R. Mendell
Jerry R. Mendell
FMFrancesco Muntoni
Francesco Muntoni
CMCraig M. McDonald
Craig M. McDonald
EMEugenio M. Mercuri
Eugenio M. Mercuri
ECEmma Ciafaloni
Emma Ciafaloni
Louise R. Rodino-KlapacLouise R. Rodino-Klapac
Louise R. Rodino-Klapac
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, X-linked neuromuscular disease caused by pathogenic variants in the DMD gene that result in the absence of functional dystrophin, beginning at birth and leading to progressive impaired motor function, loss of ambulation and life-threatening cardiorespiratory complications. Delandistrogene moxeparvovec, an adeno-associated rh74-viral vector-based gene therapy, addresses absent functional dystrophin in DMD. Here the phase 3 EMBARK study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of delandistrogene moxeparvovec in patients with DMD. Ambulatory males with DMD, ≥4 years to <8 years of age, were randomized and stratified by age group and North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) score to single-administration intravenous delandistrogene moxeparvovec (1.33 × 1014 vector genomes per kilogram; n = 63) or placebo (n = 62). At week 52, the primary endpoint, change from baseline in NSAA score, was not met (least squares mean 2.57 (delandistrogene moxeparvovec) versus 1.92 (placebo) points; between-group difference, 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.45, 1.74; P = 0.2441). Secondary efficacy endpoints included mean micro-dystrophin expression at week 12: 34.29% (treated) versus 0.00% (placebo). Other secondary efficacy endpoints at week 52 (between-group differences (95% CI)) included: Time to Rise (−0.64 (−1.06, −0.23)), 10-meter Walk/Run (−0.42 (−0.71, −0.13)), stride velocity 95th centile (0.10 (0.00, 0.19)), 100-meter Walk/Run (−3.29 (−8.28, 1.70)), time to ascend 4 steps (–0.36 (−0.71, −0.01)), PROMIS Mobility and Upper Extremity (0.05 (−0.08, 0.19); −0.04 (−0.24, 0.17)) and number of NSAA skills gained/improved (0.19 (−0.67, 1.06)). In total, 674 adverse events were recorded with delandistrogene moxeparvovec and 514 with placebo. There were no deaths, discontinuations or clinically significant complement-mediated adverse events; 7 patients (11.1%) experienced 10 treatment-related serious adverse events. Delandistrogene moxeparvovec did not lead to a significant improvement in NSAA score at week 52. Some of the secondary endpoints numerically favored treatment, although no statistical significance can be claimed. Safety was manageable and consistent with previous delandistrogene moxeparvovec trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05096221

1 October 2020 in The Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAmy G. Feldman
Amy G. Feldman
JPJulie A. Parsons
Julie A. Parsons
CDCullen M. Dutmer
Cullen M. Dutmer
AVAravindhan Veerapandiyan
Aravindhan Veerapandiyan
EHEinar Hafberg
Einar Hafberg
CMCara L. Mack
Cara L. Mack

25 July 2020 in Muscle & Nerve
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YHYohei Harada
Yohei Harada
VRVamshi K. Rao
Vamshi K. Rao
KAKapil Arya
Kapil Arya
NKNancy Kuntz
Nancy Kuntz
CDChristine J. DiDonato
Christine J. DiDonato
AVAravindhan Veerapandiyan
Aravindhan Veerapandiyan

26 November 2019 in Muscle & Nerve
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAravindhan Veerapandiyan
Aravindhan Veerapandiyan
KEKaty Eichinger
Katy Eichinger
DGDebra Guntrum
Debra Guntrum
JKJennifer Kwon
Jennifer Kwon
LBLindsay Baker
Lindsay Baker
ECEmma Ciafaloni
Emma Ciafaloni

5 May 2020 in Muscle & Nerve
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAravindhan Veerapandiyan
Aravindhan Veerapandiyan
KWKathryn R. Wagner
Kathryn R. Wagner
SASusan Apkon
Susan Apkon
CMCraig M. McDonald
Craig M. McDonald
KMKatherine D. Mathews
Katherine D. Mathews
ECEmma Ciafaloni
Emma Ciafaloni

1 February 2025 in Neurology Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMary Schroth
Mary Schroth
JDJennifer Deans
Jennifer Deans
DGDiana X. Bharucha Goebel
Diana X. Bharucha Goebel
WBW. Bryan Burnette
W. Bryan Burnette
BDBasil T. Darras
Basil T. Darras
RGRobert J. Graham
Robert J. Graham
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by biallelic variants of the Survival Motor Neuron 1 gene (SMN1) that affects approximately 1 in 15,000 live births. Availability of 3 SMN-enhancing treatments for SMA has led to urgency to review how clinicians and patients use these treatments for SMA, while additional research and real-world data and experience are being collected. This work describes important factors to assist with decision-making for SMN-enhancing treatments. A systematic literature review was conducted on SMN-enhancing treatments for SMA and related studies. A working group of American and European health care providers with expertise in SMA care identified barriers and developed recommendations through a modified Delphi technique with serial surveys and feedback through virtual meetings to fill gaps for information where evidence is limited. A community working group of an individual living with SMA and caregivers provided insight and perspective on SMA treatments and support through a virtual meeting to guide recommendations. The health care provider working group and the community working group agreed that when determining whether to start, change, add, or discontinue a treatment, essential considerations include patient and family/caregiver perspective, and treatment safety and side effects. When initiating treatment for patients newly diagnosed with SMA, important patient characteristics are age and Survival Motor Neuron 2 gene (SMN2) copy number. Furthermore, when initiating, changing, or adding treatment, current clinical status and comorbidities drive decision-making. When considering a medication or treatment plan change, unless there is an urgent indication, a treatment and associated patient outcomes should be monitored for a minimum of 6–12 months. When determining a treatment plan with an adolescent or adult with SMA, consider factors such as quality of life, burden vs benefit of treatment, and reproductive issues. Access to care coordination and interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary care are essential to treatment success. Sharing information about current knowledge of treatments and shared decision-making between health care providers and patients living with SMA and caregivers are essential to overcoming barriers to providing SMN-enhancing treatments.