Unlike most previous studies examining the causal relationship and dependence between exchange rates and real estate prices, this study aims to investigate the causal relationship and dependence between these two variables in a boom-and-bust market setting using the panel quantile Granger causality and dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) copula GARCH approaches, respectively. In the panel quantile Granger causality test, quantiles 0.1 and 0.9 are considered to represent extreme markets (bust and boom, respectively). Our first results showed the causal effects at extreme quantiles to be very different from those at the median quantile. We also found a greater causality between house prices and exchange rates in the boom market compared to the bust market. In the second model, we explored the relationship between exchange rates and real estate prices, taking boom-and-bust dynamics into account by measuring the tail dependence through the DCC copula GARCH method. Our findings confirm the strong time-varying tail dependence between house prices and exchange rates. The degree of tail dependence was quite stable over the sample period, except for the periods around 1997–1998 and 2008–2009, when the degree of tail dependence was stronger and less persistent. These two periods correspond to the two great financial crises in Asia and the USA, respectively.

This study examines the asymmetric relationship between housing prices and stock market returns across China’s major economic regions. Specifically, it investigates whether positive and negative shocks exhibit different transmission dynamics and whether these dynamics vary across regions characterized by different levels of financial development and housing market maturity. Using monthly data from 2005 to 2024, the study employs region-specific asymmetric vector autoregression (VAR) models, asymmetric Granger causality tests, and generalized impulse response analysis based on asymmetric decompositions of housing prices and stock market returns. The results suggest that statistically significant housing-to-stock predictability is observed primarily following negative housing price shocks in selected regions, whereas positive shocks generally exhibit weaker or statistically insignificant predictive effects. Conversely, positive stock market shocks generally provide more consistent evidence of stock-to-housing predictability, particularly in the Eastern and Central regions, although the responses are more mixed in the Western region and vary in magnitude, statistical significance, and persistence across regional markets. Overall, the results provide evidence of heterogeneous dynamic transmission patterns across China’s major economic regions and suggest that housing-related downside risk may represent an important source of regional macro-financial vulnerability.