Anders Knudby

Dr. Anders Knudby

Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Ottawa, Simard 029, 60 Université, Ottawa, ON, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBrandon Heung
Brandon Heung
HHHung Chak Ho
Hung Chak Ho
JZJin Zhang
Jin Zhang
Anders KnudbyAnders Knudby
Anders Knudby
CBChuck E. Bulmer
Chuck E. Bulmer
MSMargaret G. Schmidt
Margaret G. Schmidt

1 February 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHung Chak Ho
Hung Chak Ho
Anders KnudbyAnders Knudby
Anders Knudby
YXYongming Xu
Yongming Xu
MHMatus Hodul
Matus Hodul
MAMehdi Aminipouri
Mehdi Aminipouri

1 November 2014 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHung Chak Ho
Hung Chak Ho
Anders KnudbyAnders Knudby
Anders Knudby
PSPaul Sirovyak
Paul Sirovyak
YXYongming Xu
Yongming Xu
MHMatus Hodul
Matus Hodul
SHSarah B. Henderson
Sarah B. Henderson

1 February 2010 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anders KnudbyAnders Knudby
Anders Knudby
Alexander BrenningAlexander Brenning
Alexander Brenning
ELEllsworth LeDrew
Ellsworth LeDrew

25 February 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CIChristopher Ilori
Christopher Ilori
NPNima Pahlevan
Nima Pahlevan
Anders KnudbyAnders Knudby
Anders Knudby
Ocean colour (OC) remote sensing is important for monitoring marine ecosystems. However, inverting the OC signal from the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance measured by satellite sensors remains a challenge as the retrieval accuracy is highly dependent on the performance of the atmospheric correction as well as sensor calibration. In this study, the performances of four atmospheric correction (AC) algorithms, the Atmospheric and Radiometric Correction of Satellite Imagery (ARCSI), Atmospheric Correction for OLI ‘lite’ (ACOLITE), Landsat 8 Surface Reflectance (LSR) Climate Data Record (Landsat CDR), herein referred to as LaSRC (Landsat 8 Surface Reflectance Code), and the Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) Data Analysis System (SeaDAS), implemented for Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) data, were evaluated. The OLI-derived remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) products (also known as Level-2 products) were tested against near-simultaneous in-situ data acquired from the OC component of the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET-OC). Analyses of the match-ups revealed that generic atmospheric correction methods (i.e., ARCSI and LaSRC), which perform reasonably well over land, provide inaccurate Level-2 products over coastal waters, in particular, in the blue bands. Between water-specific AC methods (i.e., SeaDAS and ACOLITE), SeaDAS was found to perform better over complex waters with root-mean-square error (RMSE) varying from 0.0013 to 0.0005 sr−1 for the 443 and 655 nm channels, respectively. An assessment of the effects of dominant environmental variables revealed AC retrieval errors were influenced by the solar zenith angle and wind speed for ACOLITE and SeaDAS in the 443 and 482 nm channels. Recognizing that the AERONET-OC sites are not representative of inland waters, extensive research and analyses are required to further evaluate the performance of various AC methods for high-resolution imagers like Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 under a broad range of aquatic/atmospheric conditions.