Bing Yin

Dr. Bing Yin

College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 March 2020 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Bing YinBing Yin
Bing Yin
CLChao-Chao Li
Chao-Chao Li
In this work, a theoretical method for the prediction of both the relaxation time of quantum tunneling of magnetization (τQTM) and the effective barrier of magnetic reversal (Ueff) is proposed for single-ion magnet (SIM) systems of Kramers type. The reliability of theoretical τQTM is tested within a large series of 18 lanthanide SIMs. Compared to the experimental results, the deviations of theoretical τQTM are within one order of magnitude for 11 tested SIMs and the largest order-of-magnitude deviation is only 1.86. In the aspect of Ueff, for 5 typical high-performance Dy-SIMs of the local coordination mode of a pentagonal bipyramid, the relative deviations of theoretical values lie within the range of 1.4–7.2%. Thus this method possesses good reliability, at least in the aspect of the order of magnitude. Besides an empirical estimate of the local magnetic field experienced by the central ion, for a given SIM, one ab initio calculation, providing accurate g-factors of both ground and excited Kramers doublets (KDs), is the only computational cost. Therefore this method has a high degree of both reliability and efficiency. Based on the temperature dependence of theoretically predicted Ueff and its contributions from various KDs, some mechanistic information on the magnetic relaxation could be given by this method too. Therefore it is reasonable to expect the bright prospect of this method in the aspects of both the interpretation of the existing experimental results and rational design of future high-performance SIMs.

14 March 2018 in Journal of Materials Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZJZhijie Jiang
Zhijie Jiang
LSLin Sun
Lin Sun
QYQi Yang
Qi Yang
Bing YinBing Yin
Bing Yin
HKHongshan Ke
Hongshan Ke
SCSanping Chen
Sanping Chen
In this work, a large excess of electrostatic repulsion, arising from the axial ligands, over that from the equatorial ligands is taken as the design strategy for high performance pentagonal bipyramidal (PBP) DyIII single-ion magnets (SIMs).

12 November 2015 in Chemical Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YDYi-Fei Deng
Yi-Fei Deng
THTian Han
Tian Han
Zhenxing WangZhenxing Wang
Zhenxing Wang
ZOZhongwen Ouyang
Zhongwen Ouyang
Bing YinBing Yin
Bing Yin
YZYan-Zhen Zheng
Yan-Zhen Zheng
Two chromium(ii) complexes exhibit single-molecule-magnet behavior due to uniaxial magnetic anisotropy revealed by magnetic and HF-EPR studies.

29 July 2020 in Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZZZhong-Hong Zhu
Zhong-Hong Zhu
HWHui-Feng Wang
Hui-Feng Wang
SYShui Yu
Shui Yu
HZHua-Hong Zou
Hua-Hong Zou
HWHai-Ling Wang
Hai-Ling Wang
FLFu-Pei Liang
Fu-Pei Liang

6 October 2017 in Chemistry – A European Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMin Li
Min Li
HWHaipeng Wu
Haipeng Wu
QYQi Yang
Qi Yang
HKHongshan Ke
Hongshan Ke
Bing YinBing Yin
Bing Yin
SCSanping Chen
Sanping Chen

28 April 2017 in Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YDYi-Fei Deng
Yi-Fei Deng
THTian Han
Tian Han
Bing YinBing Yin
Bing Yin
Yan-Zhen ZhengYan-Zhen Zheng
Yan-Zhen Zheng
Two mononuclear trigonal-planar Co(II) complexes [Na(THF)6][Co(OAr)3] 1 and [(THF)3NaCo(OAr)3] 2 (OAr− = 2,6-di-tert-butylphenoxo, THF = tetrahydrofuran) with the same coordination number and donor atoms, as well as similar ligand fields except only for the local symmetry of Co(II), were isolated to test the symmetry-magnetization correlations. Although both complexes share similar magnetic anisotropy of the central Co(II) ions (D = −85.4 cm−1 for 1 and D = −80.6 cm−1 for 2), complex 1 exhibits single-ion magnet (SIM) behaviour while 2 displays no slow magnetic relaxation of magnetization with an applied magnetic field up to 7000 Oe. Such distinct performance is ascribed to the different effects of quantum tunneling of magnetization (QTM), which is further associated with the structural symmetry, namely, a strict C2v local symmetry for 1 and Cs local symmetry for 2. Theoretical calculations also indicate a larger value of transversal factors for 2, and hence a stronger QTM to be suppressed with a larger magnetic field at which the direct process is probably promoted, leading to the absence of SIM behavior of 2.