Lilia Carlo

Mrs. Lilia Carlo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Continental Shelf Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Carla FaraciCarla Faraci
Carla Faraci
Rosaria Ester MusumeciRosaria Ester Musumeci
Rosaria Ester Musumeci
Massimiliano MarinoMassimiliano Marino
Massimiliano Marino
Alessia RuggeriAlessia Ruggeri
Alessia Ruggeri
LCLilia Carlo
Lilia Carlo
BEBjorn Elsaßer
Bjorn Elsaßer

16 December 2022 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLilia Carlo
Lilia Carlo
Claudio IuppaClaudio Iuppa
Claudio Iuppa
Carla FaraciCarla Faraci
Carla Faraci

13 October 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Claudio IuppaClaudio Iuppa
Claudio Iuppa
LCLilia Carlo
Lilia Carlo
EFEnrico Foti
Enrico Foti
Carla FaraciCarla Faraci
Carla Faraci
The purpose of this work is the calibration of a numerical model for simulating the interaction of waves with a composite caisson having an internal rubble mound to dissipate incident sea wave energy. In particular, the analysis focused on the reflection coefficient and the pressure distribution at the caisson vertical walls. The numerical model is based on the Volume-Average Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (VARANS) equations. Through three closure terms (linear, nonlinear, and transition), such equations take into account some phenomena that cannot be dealt when the volume-average method is used (i.e., frictional forces, pressure force, and added mass). To reproduce properly the real phenomena, a calibration process of such terms is necessary. The reference data used in the calibration process were obtained from an experimental campaign carried out at the Hydraulics Laboratory of the University of Messina. The calibration process allowed the proper prediction of certain phenomena to be expressed as a function of different closing terms. In particular, it was estimated that the reflection coefficient and the wave loading at the frontal wall are better reproduced when all three terms are considered, while the force at the rear wall is better simulated when the effects of such terms are neglected.