Song DJ, et al. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 Nov;10(6):591-613. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2018.10.6.591

The increasing prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with variations in indoor environments. In Korea, many inner walls of homes are covered with wallpaper: such walls emit indoor air pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde. This randomized, double-blind study investigated the effects of wallpaper on indoor air quality and AD. Thirty-one children (aged three to eight years) with moderate AD were assigned to environmentally-friendly (EF) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wallpaper groups. Indoor air concentrations of VOCs, natural VOCs (NVOCs), formaldehyde, and total suspended bacteria were measured before and two (W₂) and eight weeks (W₈) after wallpapering. Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) evaluations and blood tests were performed during the same period. The EF wallpaper and PVC wallpaper groups showed similar trends in the changes in total VOCs (TVOC) and formaldehyde content in the indoor air. However, the EF wallpaper group showed more improvement on the SCORAD at W₂ and W₈ than the PVC wallpaper group. The SCORAD index was positively correlated with several indoor air pollutants. Further, the SCORAD index and NVOC % were negatively correlated. Improved SCORAD index and effects of wallpapering on indoor air quality improvements occurred within a short period of time in both groups. We believe that NVOCs in indoor air after EF wallpapering have a beneficial effect on health.

Choi YJ, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jan;34(3):e25. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e25

Although rare, antihistamines can cause adverse effects, including drug-induced eruptions or anaphylaxis. A 4-year-old child visited the pediatric department of a hospital for skin eruptions after administration of antihistamines, (e.g., ucerax [hydroxyzine] or leptizine [levocetirizine]), for cholinergic rashes; he did not have pruritus. Skin prick, intradermal, and drug provocation tests were performed to determine the relationship between the antihistamines and eruptions. Levocetirizine induced wheals in the skin prick test and a rash in the oral drug provocation test. In contrast, ketotifen induced no reaction in the skin prick test but showed a positive reaction in the oral provocation test. Our case report highlights that children can experience the same types of adverse reactions as seen in adults, and cross-reactivity between various antihistamines can occur.

We developed an objective structured oral examination (OSOE) case to assess the medical ethics of students. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of OSOE with generalizability theory.One 10-minute OSOE that contained key questions was developed. The evaluation sheet consisted of 4 domains: moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, decision making, and attitude. The total number of items was 13. The numbers of checklist items and global rating items were 11 and 2, respectively. Items and key questions were validated by 6 professionals. Standardization of the raters and the pilot study was performed before the OSOE. Fifty-four third-year medical students participated in the OSOE. The OSOE was duplicated, and 2 professors assessed 1 student independently. Each station lasted 8 minutes and was followed by a 2-minute interval,during which raters completed the checklist forms. We analyzed the reliability of the OSOE with the GENOVA program.The reliability (generalizability coefficient) was 0.945, and the interrater agreement was 0.867. The type of item, checklist or global rating, was the largest variance component. The reliability of the checklist alone was 0.668 and that of the global rating alone was 0.363.The OSOE is reliable and can be used to assess ethics. More research should focus on achieving validity.

Kim JK, et al. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis. 2019 Apr;7(2):73-77. https://doi.org/10.4168/aard.2019.7.2.73