Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon

Dr. Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2009 in The Clinical Journal of Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Josué Fernandez CarneroJosué Fernandez Carnero
Josué Fernandez Carnero
César Fernandez-de-las-PeñasCésar Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
César Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
ARAna Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon
HGHong-You Ge
Hong-You Ge
LALars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
The aim of this study was to investigate whether generalized deep tissue hyperalgesia exists in patients with chronic unilateral lateral epicondylalgia (LE). A total of 26 LE patients (10 males and 16 females, aged 25 to 63 y) and 20 healthy comparable matched controls (aged 26 to 61 y) were recruited and pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed bilaterally over the median, ulnar, and radial nerve trunks, the lateral epicondyle, C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint, and the tibialis anterior muscle in a blind design. PPT was significantly decreased bilaterally over the median, ulnar, and radial nerve trunks, the lateral epicondyle, the C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint, and tibialis anterior muscle in patients with LE than healthy controls (all P<0.001). PPTs over those measured points was negatively related to current elbow pain intensity (all P<0.05). A more significant decrease in PPTs were present in females (all P<0.05). This revealed a widespread mechanical hypersensitivity in patients with LE, which suggest that central sensitization mechanisms are involved in patients with unilateral LE. The generalized decrease in PPT levels was associated with elbow pain intensity, supporting a role of peripheral sensitization mechanisms in the initiation or maintenance of central sensitization mechanisms. In addition, females may be more prone to the development of generalized mechanical hypersensitivity.

31 March 2009 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
César Fernandez-de-las-PeñasCésar Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
César Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
ARAna Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Josué Fernandez CarneroJosué Fernandez Carnero
Josué Fernandez Carnero
MCMaría Luz Cuadrado
María Luz Cuadrado
LALars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
JPJuan A. Pareja
Juan A. Pareja
The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral widespread pressure hypersensitivity exists in patients with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A total of 20 females with carpal tunnel syndrome (aged 22–60 years), and 20 healthy matched females (aged 21–60 years old) were recruited. Pressure pain thresholds were assessed bilaterally over median, ulnar, and radial nerve trunks, the C5–C6 zygapophyseal joint, the carpal tunnel and the tibialis anterior muscle in a blinded design. The results showed that pressure pain threshold levels were significantly decreased bilaterally over the median, ulnar, and radial nerve trunks, the carpal tunnel, the C5–C6 zygapophyseal joint, and the tibialis anterior muscle in patients with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome as compared to healthy controls (all, P < 0.001). Pressure pain threshold was negatively correlated to both hand pain intensity and duration of symptoms (all, P < 0.001). Our findings revealed bilateral widespread pressure hypersensitivity in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome, which suggest that widespread central sensitization is involved in patients with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. The generalized decrease in pressure pain thresholds associated with pain intensity and duration of symptoms supports a role of the peripheral drive to initiate and maintain central sensitization. Nevertheless, both central and peripheral sensitization mechanisms are probably involved at the same time in carpal tunnel syndrome.

10 December 2021 in Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
César Fernandez-de-las-PeñasCésar Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
César Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
ARAna Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon
RORicardo Ortega-Santiago
Ricardo Ortega-Santiago
SQSilvia Ambite Quesada
Silvia Ambite Quesada
VGVíctor Gómez‐Mayordomo
Víctor Gómez‐Mayordomo
LALars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
This study investigated the prevalence of long-term musculoskeletal post-COVID pain and their risk factors in a large cohort of COVID-19 survivors. A multicenter cohort study including patients hospitalised because of COVID-19 in 5 hospitals of Madrid (Spain) during the first wave of the pandemic was conducted. Hospitalisation and clinical data were collected from medical records. Patients were scheduled for a telephone interview after hospital discharge for collecting data about the musculoskeletal post-COVID pain. Anxiety/depressive levels and sleep quality were likewise assessed. From 2000 patients recruited, a total of 1969 individuals (46.4% women, age: 61 years, SD: 16 years) were assessed on average at 8.4 (SD: 1.5) months after discharge. At the time of the study, 887 (45% women) reported musculoskeletal post-COVID pain. According to the presence of previous pain symptoms, the prevalence of “de novo” (new-onset) musculoskeletal post-COVID pain was 74.9%, whereas 25.1% experienced an increase in previous symptoms (exacerbated COVID-related pain). Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.349, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.059-1.720), history of musculoskeletal pain (OR 1.553, 95% CI 1.271-1.898), presence of myalgia (OR 1.546, 95% CI 1.155-2.070) and headache (1.866, 95% CI 1.349-2.580) as COVID-19–associated onset symptoms, and days at hospital (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.004-1.022) were risk factors associated with musculoskeletal post-COVID pain. In conclusion, musculoskeletal post-COVID pain is present in 45.1% of COVID-19 survivors at 8 months after hospital discharge with most patients developing de novo post-COVID pain. Female sex, history of musculoskeletal pain, presence of myalgia and headache as COVID-19 symptoms at the acute phase, and days at hospital were risk factors associated with musculoskeletal post-COVID pain.

1 May 2007 in The Clinical Journal of Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Josué Fernandez CarneroJosué Fernandez Carnero
Josué Fernandez Carnero
César Fernandez-de-las-PeñasCésar Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
César Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
ARAna Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon
HGHong-You Ge
Hong-You Ge
LALars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Objective Referred pain and pain characteristics evoked from the extensor carpi radialis brevis, extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor digitorum communis, and brachioradialis muscles was investigated in 20 patients with lateral epicondylalgia (LE) and 20-matched controls. Methods Both groups were examined for the presence of myofascial trigger points (TrPs) in a blinded fashion. The quality and location of the evoked referred pain, and the pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the lateral epicondyle on the right upper extremity (symptomatic side in patients, and dominant-side on controls) were recorded. Several lateral elbow pain parameters were also evaluated. Results Within the patient group, the elicited referred pain by manual exploration of 13 out of 20 (65%) extensor carpi radialis brevis muscles, 12/20 (70%) extensor carpi radialis longus muscles, 10/20 (50%) brachioradialis muscles, and 5/20 (25%) extensor digitorum communis muscles, shares similar pain patterns as their habitual lateral elbow and forearm pain. The mean number of muscles with TrPs for each patient was 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1,4] of which 2 (95% CI 1,3) were active, and 0.9 (95% CI 0,2) were latent TrPs. Control participants only had latent TrPs (mean: 0.4; 95% CI 0,2). TrP occurrence between the 2 groups was significantly different for active TrPs (P0.05). The referred pain pattern was larger in patients than in controls, with pain referral to the lateral epicondyle (proximally) and to the dorso-lateral aspect of the forearm in the patients, and confined to the dorso-lateral aspect of the forearm in the controls. Patients with LE showed a significant (P<0.001) lower PPT (mean: 2.1 kg/cm2; 95% CI 0.8, 4 kg/cm2) as compared with controls (mean: 4.5 kg/cm2; 95% CI 3, 7 kg/cm2). Within the patient group, PPT at the lateral epicondyle was negatively correlated with both the total number of TrPs (rs=−0.63; P=0.003) and the number of active TrPs (rs=−0.5; P=0.02): the greater the number of active TrPs, the lower the PPT at the lateral epicondyle. Discussion Our results suggest that in patients with LE, the evoked referred pain and its sensory characteristics shared similar patterns as their habitual elbow and forearm pain, consistent with active TrPs. Lower PPT and larger referred pain patterns suggest that peripheral and central sensitization exists in LE.

1 July 2015 in Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMario Téllez-García
Mario Téllez-García
ARAna Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon
JSJaime Salom-Moreno
Jaime Salom-Moreno
MPMaria Palacios-Ceña
Maria Palacios-Ceña
RORicardo Ortega-Santiago
Ricardo Ortega-Santiago
César Fernandez-de-las-PeñasCésar Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
César Fernandez-de-las-Peñas

1 September 2012 in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRaquel Martínez-Segura
Raquel Martínez-Segura
ARAna Isabel de la Llave Rincon
Ana Isabel de la Llave Rincon
RORicardo Ortega-Santiago
Ricardo Ortega-Santiago
JCJoshua A. Cleland
Joshua A. Cleland
César Fernandez-de-las-PeñasCésar Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
César Fernandez-de-las-Peñas
Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Objectives: To compare the effects of cervical versus thoracic thrust manipulation in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain on pressure pain sensitivity, neck pain, and cervical range of motion (CROM). Background: Evidence suggests that spinal interventions can stimulate descending inhibitory pain pathways. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the neurophysiological effects of thoracic thrust manipulation in individuals with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain, including widespread changes on pressure sensitivity. Methods: Ninety patients (51% female) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: cervical thrust manipulation on the right, cervical thrust manipulation on the left, or thoracic thrust manipulation. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) over the C5–6 zygapophyseal joint, lateral epicondyle, and tibialis anterior muscle, neck pain (11-point numeric pain rating scale), and cervical spine range of motion (CROM) were collected at baseline and 10 minutes after the intervention by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the patients. Mixed-model analyses of covariance were used to examine the effects of the treatment on each outcome variable, with group as the between-subjects variable, time and side as the within-subject variables, and gender as the covariate. The primary analysis was the group-by-time interaction. Results: No significant interactions were found with the mixed-model analyses of covariance for PPT level (C5–6, P>.210; lateral epicondyle, P>.186; tibialis anterior muscle, P>.268), neck pain intensity (P = .923), or CROM (flexion, P = .700; extension, P = .387; lateral flexion, P>.672; rotation, P>.192) as dependent variables. All groups exhibited similar changes in PPT, neck pain, and CROM (all, P<.001). Gender did not influence the main effects or the interaction effects in the analyses of the outcomes (P>.10). Conclusion: The results of the current randomized clinical trial suggest that cervical and thoracic thrust manipulation induce similar changes in PPT, neck pain intensity, and CROM in individuals with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain. However, changes in PPT and CROM were small and did not surpass their respective minimal detectable change values. Further, because we did not include a control group, we cannot rule out a placebo effect of the thrust interventions on the outcomes. Level of Evidence: Therapy, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(9):806–814, Epub 18 June 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4151