Introduction Real-world evidence (RWE) confirms that reductions in HbA1c for children and adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are associated with use of the FreeStyle Libre system. This current meta-analysis aims to investigate whether HbA1c benefits are sustained over 24 months and to identify patterns of change in HbA1c for users of the FreeStyle Libre system for people living with T1DM or T2DM. Methods A bibliographic search up to December 2020 identified 75 studies reporting data on change in lab HbA1c in 30,478 participants with type 1 (n = 28,063; 62 trials) or type 2 diabetes (n = 2415; 13 trials) using the FreeStyle Libre system, including observations on children, adolescents and adults. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Results Reductions in HbA1c at 3–4 months were similar for adults with T1DM (− 0.53%, 95% CI − 0.69 to − 0.38) or with T2DM (− 0.45%, 95% CI − 0.57 to − 0.33), continuing through 4.5–7.5 months in T1DM (− 0.42%, 95% CI − 0.58 to − 0.27) and in T2DM (− 0.59%, 95% CI − 0.80 to − 0.39). Meta-regression analysis shows that higher starting HbA1c is correlated with greater reductions in HbA1c in T1DM and in T2DM. These patterns of change in HbA1c were sustained for 24 months in T1DM and for at least 12 months in T2DM. Conclusions Meta-analysis of RWE confirms that using the FreeStyle Libre system is associated with significant reductions in HbA1c for adults with T1DM or with T2DM. Reductions are greater for people with higher baseline HbA1c and are sustained for 24 and 12 months in T1DM and TD2M respectively.

People with diabetes are at greater risk for negative outcomes from COVID-19. Though this risk is multifactorial, poor glycaemic control before and during admission to hospital for COVID-19 is likely to contribute to the increased risk. The COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions on mobility and interaction can also be expected to impact on daily glucose management of people with diabetes. Telemonitoring of glucose metrics has been widely used during the pandemic in people with diabetes, including adults and children with T1D, allowing an exploration of the impact of COVID-19 inside and outside the hospital setting on glycaemic control. To date, 27 studies including 69,294 individuals with T1D have reported the effect of glycaemic control during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite restricted access to diabetes clinics, glycaemic control has not deteriorated for 25/27 cohorts and improved in 23/27 study groups. Significantly, time in range (TIR) 70–180 mg/dL (3.9–10 mmol/L) increased across 19/27 cohorts with a median 3.3% (− 6.0% to 11.2%) change. Thirty per cent of the cohorts with TIR data reported an average clinically significant TIR improvement of 5% or more, possibly as a consequence of more accurate glucose monitoring and improved connectivity through telemedicine. Periodic consultations using telemedicine enables care of people with diabetes while limiting the need for in-person attendance at diabetes clinics. Reports that sustained hyperglycaemia and early-stage diabetic ketoacidosis may go untreated because of the lockdown and concerns about potential exposure to the risk of infection argue for wider access to glucose telemonitoring. Therefore, in this paper we have critically reviewed reports concerning use of telemonitoring in the acute hospitalized setting as well as during daily diabetes management. Furthermore, we discuss the indications and implications of adopting telemonitoring and telemedicine in the present challenging time, as well as their potential for the future.

Introduction: Hypoglycaemia is a significant burden to people living with diabetes and an impediment to achieving optimal glycaemic outcomes. The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has improved the capacity to assess duration and level of hypoglycaemia. The personal impact of sensor‐detected hypoglycaemia (SDH) is unclear. Hypo‐METRICS is an observational study designed to define the threshold and duration of sensor glucose that provides the optimal sensitivity and specificity for events that people living with diabetes experience as hypoglycaemia.Methods: We will recruit 600 participants: 350 with insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes, 200 with type 1 diabetes and awareness of hypoglycaemia and 50 with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia who have recent experience of hypoglycaemia. Participants will wear a blinded CGM device and an actigraphy monitor to differentiate awake and sleep times for 10 weeks. Participants will be asked to complete three short surveys each day using a bespoke mobile phone app, a technique known as ecological momentary assessment. Participants will also record all episodes of self‐detected hypoglycaemia on the mobile app. We will use particle Markov chain Monte Carlo optimization to identify the optimal threshold and duration of SDH that have optimum sensitivity and specificity for detecting patient‐reported hypoglycaemia. Key secondary objectives include measuring the impact of symptomatic and asymptomatic SDH on daily functioning and health economic outcomes.Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by local ethical boards in all participating centres. Study results will be shared with participants, in peer‐reviewed journal publications and conference presentations.

Aims/hypothesis: It has been proposed that severe hypoglycaemia events (SHE) may increase the risk of adverse CVD complications in adults with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of CVD complications following SHE in a large cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes, and to compare the risk of post-SHE CVD complications for users of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) vs users of blood glucose monitoring (BGM). Methods: This comparative retrospective cohort study used data from the Swedish National Diabetes Register and the Swedish National Patient Register. We identified people with type 1 diabetes who had a hospitalisation for CVD complications. Rates of hospitalisation were compared between those with an index SHE and those without, and within isCGM or BGM subgroups. The study baseline was date of the first SHE prior to the isCGM index date. Results: We identified 14,829 adults with type 1 diabetes with up to 2 years of follow-up, of which 1313 had an index SHE. In the full cohort, the relative rate of hospitalisations for CVD complications was 2.06-fold (95% CI 1.48, 2.85) in those with prior SHE. Of these 1313 participants with prior SHE, 970 were using isCGM and 343 were using BGM. Hospitalisations for post-SHE CVD complications were significantly lower for isCGM users (5.40 per 100 person-years of follow-up; 95% CI 4.59, 6.31) compared with BGM control participants (14.23 per 100 person-years of follow-up; 95% CI 11.95, 16.82), which represents a 78% relative reduction in rates of post-SHE CVD complications for isCGM users (relative rate 0.22; 95% CI 0.11, 0.43; p<0.001), after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions/interpretation: In adults with type 1 diabetes, SHE is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation for adverse CVD complications. This risk is significantly reduced in isCGM users compared with BGM control participants. Graphical

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate change in laboratory-measured HbA1c in patients with either type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) on insulin therapy following initiation of the FreeStyle Libre™ flash glucose monitoring system. Methods This was a retrospective observational study on adults with T1D or T2D on insulin, who were started on the FreeStyle Libre system as part of standard care. HbA1c was recorded at initiation and at 3-month intervals thereafter. Results The analysis included 131 patients with T1D and 176 patients with T2D on insulin. Mean HbA1c decreased significantly by 3 months following initiation of the FreeStyle Libre system, both in T1D (− 0.75%, p < 0.001) and in T2D (− 0.54%, p < 0.001). Reductions were maintained for 12 months. Change from 3 to 12 months was not significant either in T1D or T2D. Subgroup analysis showed significant reduction in patients with a baseline HbA1c > 7.5–10%, both in T1D (− 0.59%, p < 0.001) and in T2D on insulin (− 0.62%, p < 0.005) at 12 months. Reductions for subjects with HbA1c > 10% were − 4.66% in T1D and − 3.73% in T2D. No change was seen for subjects with a baseline HbA1c ≤ 7.5% (58 mmol/mol). Linear regression confirms that baseline HbA1c is strongly negatively correlated with subsequent change in HbA1c in T1D and in T2D. Conclusions Patients with T1D or T2D show a reduction in HbA1c by 3 months following initiation of the FreeStyle Libre system. The mean fall in HbA1c at 3 months is strongly negatively correlated with starting HbA1c. This reduction is maintained over 12 months. The significant benefit is seen in patients with a starting HbA1c > 7.5% (58 mmol/mol).