Background: Do gender, age, body mass and height influence eye biometrical properties in young adults? Methods: A total of 155 eyes (92 female, 63 male) of healthy subjects between the ages of 18 and 39 years were included in the study. The subjects’ gender and age were recorded, and their body mass, height and biometrical properties of the eyes were measured. Results: The male subjects had significantly thicker and flatter corneas and lower minimal rim-to-disk ratios than the female subjects did. In both genders, age showed strong, negative correlations with anterior chamber depth and pupil diameter and a positive correlation with lens thickness. We also found significant, negative correlations between body height and mass with keratometry measurements, negative correlations between body height and optic disk rim area and rim volume, and positive correlations between body mass and axial length in both genders. Conclusions: Biometric eye parameters differ among people. In addition to age and gender, which are usually taken into consideration when interpreting ocular biometry findings, we strongly suggest that body height and mass should be also routinely considered when interpreting eye biometry data, as these factors have an impact on ocular biometry.

This cross-sectional study aims to examine the quality of life and difficulties in the daily functioning of patients with impaired visual acuity treated with intravitreal drugs. The survey included 180 adult respondents (78 male and 102 female). The standardized, validated questionnaire VFQ 25 version 2000 was used to measure the quality of life. Results show that, in general, regarding visual functioning, men are significantly more satisfied than women, they rate less intensity of pain, and their distance vision is better. Men report fewer restrictions than women, better color, peripheral vision, and overall visual functioning. The best vision results are in individuals under the age of 60 who also report significantly better social functioning, mental health, fewer restrictions, and less dependence on others. The only significant association between the number of drug applications and the scale of visual functioning is driving motor vehicles—the more applications of the drug they received, the less likely they are to drive a car. The quality of life in patients with chronic ophthalmic diseases treated with intravitreal drugs is reduced, particularly in elderly and female patients who have poorer visual acuity, poorer health in general, and limited social roles.

To assess the association between vitreous hyper-reflective dots (VHD) and the macular thickness changes following uneventful phacoemulsification. In this prospective cohort study optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations were performed preoperatively and 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing cataract surgery. OCT images were analyzed for retinal central subfield thickness (CST) and preretinal VHDs. Surgeries were recorded for the assessment of lens fragments in the space of Berger. 111 eyes of 97 patient were enrolled of whom 69 (62.2%) were female. VHDs were seen in 25 eyes (22.5%) at week 1; in 21 eyes (18.9%) at month 1 and in 3 eyes (2.7%) at month 3. In all eyes with VHDs retro-capsular lens fragments were visible immediately after phacoemulsification. The number of VHDs significantly decreased over the postoperative period. There was a moderate correlation between the number of VHDs and CST at 1 month (r = 0.426, p<0.001). In eyes with VHD the CST averaged 238.8±17.6 μm (214–266) at 1 week; 276.1±63.5 μm (231–481) at 1 month and 285.1±122.3 μm (227–785) at 3 months. In eyes with no detectable VHDs CST averaged 235.9±23.3 μm (192–311) at 1 week; 240.1±21.6 μm (200–288) at 1 month and 242.2±21.3 μm (205–289) at 3 months. Although the differences among the assessment points were relatively low, there was a significant difference in general (p<0.001, Friedman test). In conclusion, VHDs seem to cause macular thickening throughout the postoperative course. The origin of VHDs is still unknown; however, they presumably represent lens fragments that provoke subclinical inflammation.