Conventional tumor grading systems based on the degree of tumor differentiation may not always be optimal because of difficulty in objective assessment and insufficient prognostic value for decision making in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. This study aimed to determine the importance of assessing the number of poorly differentiated clusters as the primary criterion for histologic grading of CRC. Five hundred consecutive patients with curatively resected stage II and III CRCs (2000 to 2005) were pathologically reviewed. Cancer clusters of ≥5 cancer cells and lacking a gland-like structure were counted under a ×20 objective lens in a field containing the highest number of clusters. Tumors with <5, 5 to 9, and ≥10 clusters were classified as grade (G)1, G2, and G3, respectively (n=156, 198, and 146 tumors, respectively). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 96%, 85%, and 59% for G1, G2, and G3, respectively (P<0.0001). Poorly differentiated clusters affected survival outcome independent of T and N stages and could help in more effective stratification of patients by survival outcome compared with tumor staging (Akaike information criterion, 1086.7 vs. 1117.0; Harrell concordance index, 0.73 vs. 0.67). The poorly differentiated cluster-based grading system showed a higher weighted κ coefficient for interobserver variability (5 observers) compared with conventional grading systems (mean, 0.66 vs. 0.52; range, 0.55 to 0.73 vs. 0.39 to 0.68). Our novel histologic grading system is expected to be less subjective and more informative for prognostic prediction compared with conventional tumor grading systems and TNM staging. It could be valuable in determining individualized postoperative CRC treatment.

Background: We aimed to present the 2019 annual report of the gastroenterological section of the National Clinical Database (NCD).Methods: We reviewed 609,589 cases recorded in 2019 and 5,029,764 cases registered from 2011 to 2019 for the 115 selected gastroenterological surgical procedures.Results: The main features of gastroenterological surgery in Japan were similar to those described in the 2018 annual report, namely, that 1) operative numbers gradually increased in all procedures, except gastrectomy and hepatectomy, which decreased in these years; 2) in all eight major gastroenterological surgeries, the age distribution tended toward older patients; 3) the morbidity of esophagectomy, hepatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy increased, but mortality was minimized in all procedures; 4) all eight major gastroenterological procedures have increasingly been performed under laparoscopy; and 5) board‐certified surgeons were increasingly involved. These trends in recent years were more prominent in 2019.Conclusions: Thanks to the continuous cooperation and dedication of the surgeons, medical staff, and surgical clinical reviewers who registered the clinical data into the NCD, it is possible to understand the comprehensive landscape of surgery in Japan and to disclose new evidence in this field. The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery will continue to promote the value of this database and encourage the use of feedback and clinical studies using the NCD, now and in the future. Generating further approaches to surgical quality improvement are important directions for future research.

PURPOSE: The International Union Against Cancer highlighted tumor budding as a tumor-related prognostic factor. International assessment criteria for tumor budding were recently defined by the 2016 International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC2016). This study aimed to clarify the prognostic and predictive values of tumor budding in a randomized controlled trial evaluating the superiority of adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil over surgery alone for stage II colon cancer (SACURA trial; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00392899 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010, we enrolled 991 patients from 123 institutions with stage II colon cancer. Tumor budding was diagnosed by central review on the basis of the criteria adopted in the ITBCC2016. We prospectively recorded all clinical and pathologic data, including the budding grade, and performed prognostic analyses after 5 years of completing the patients’ registration. RESULTS: Of 991 tumors, 376, 331, and 284 were classified as BD1, BD2, and BD3, respectively; the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 90.9%, 85.1%, and 74.4%, respectively ( P < .001), and ranged widely in T4 tumors (86.6% to 53.3%). The budding grade significantly correlated with recurrence in the liver, lungs, lymph nodes, and peritoneum ( P < .001 to .01). Multivariable analysis revealed that budding and T stage exerted an independent impact on RFS, and on the basis of the Harrell concordance index, these two factors substantially contributed to the improvement of the Cox model for predicting RFS. Both the BD2 and BD3 groups demonstrated greater improvement in the 5-year recurrence rate in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than the surgery-alone group by approximately 5%, but the difference was statistically nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Tumor budding grade on the basis of the ITBCC2016 criteria should be routinely evaluated in pathologic practice and could improve the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.

To identify the parameters related to the effective selection of patients who could receive prognostic benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection. Accurate preoperative diagnosis of lateral nodal involvement (LNI) remains difficult, and the indications for lateral lymph node dissection have been controversial. A total of 244 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery with lateral dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer (1985–2000) were reviewed. Patients were stratified into groups based on various parameters, and the therapeutic value index for survival benefit was compared among groups. The therapeutic index of lateral dissection was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis to the lateral area and the cancer-related 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to the lateral area, irrespective of metastasis to other areas (mesorectal, superior rectal artery [SRA], and inferior mesenteric artery [IMA] areas). LNI was observed in 41 patients (17%); and 88% of them had nodal involvement in the region along the internal iliac/pudendal artery or in the obturator region (“vulnerable field”). The cancer-related 5-year survival rate among the patients with LNI was 42%; the therapeutic index for lateral dissection was calculated as 7.0 patients, which was much higher than that of lymphadenectomy of the SRA area (1.6 patients) and the IMA area (0.4 patients), and almost comparable to that of lymphadenectomy of the upward mesorectal area (6.9 patients). Although it was possible to select groups at high and low risk for LNI based on several parameters related to tumor aggressiveness, such as tumor differentiation in biopsy specimens, the therapeutic value index was not significantly different between these groups. Unlike these parameters, the diameter of the largest lymph node in the “vulnerable field,” which was positively correlated with the rate of LNI but irrelevant to the prognosis, was able to successfully stratify patients by therapeutic index. Advanced lower rectal cancer patients having LNI in the lateral pelvic area are likely to receive prognostic benefit from lymphadenectomy. The most efficient means of determining the effectiveness of lateral dissection preoperatively is to estimate the nodal diameter in the “vulnerable” lateral regions by diagnostic imaging.