The spine apparatus is a cellular organelle that is present in many dendritic spines of excitatory neurons in the mammalian forebrain. Despite its discovery >40 years ago, the function of the spine apparatus is still unknown although calcium buffering functions as well as roles in synaptic plasticity have been proposed. We have recently shown that the 100-kDa protein synaptopodin is associated with the spine apparatus. Here, we now report that mice homozygous for a targeted deletion of thesynaptopodingene completely lack spine apparatuses. Interestingly, this absence of the spine apparatus is accompanied by a reduction in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 region of the hippocampus and by an impairment of spatial learning in the radial arm maze test. This genetic analysis points to a role of the spine apparatus in synaptic plasticity.

Synaptic ribbons are large, dynamic structures in the active zone complex of ribbon synapses and important for the physiological properties of these tonically active synapses. RIBEYE is a unique and major protein component of synaptic ribbons. The aim of the present study was to understand how the synaptic ribbon is built and how the construction of the ribbon could contribute to its ultrastructural plasticity. In the present study, we demonstrate that RIBEYE self-associates using different independent approaches (yeast two-hybrid analyses, protein pull downs, synaptic ribbon–RIBEYE interaction assays, coaggregation experiments, transmission electron microscopy and immunogold electron microscopy). The A-domain [RIBEYE(A)] and B-domain [RIBEYE(B)] of RIBEYE contain five distinct sites for RIBEYE–RIBEYE interactions. Three interaction sites are present in the A-domain of RIBEYE and mediate RIBEYE(A)–RIBEYE(A) homodimerization and heterodimerization with the B-domain. The docking site for RIBEYE(A) on RIBEYE(B) is topographically and functionally different from the RIBEYE(B) homodimerization interface and is negatively regulated by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. The identified multiple RIBEYE–RIBEYE interactions have the potential to build the synaptic ribbon: heterologously expressed RIBEYE forms large electron-dense aggregates that are in part physically associated with surrounding vesicles and membrane compartments. These structures resemble spherical synaptic ribbons. These ribbon-like structures coassemble with the active zone protein bassoon, an interaction partner of RIBEYE at the active zone of ribbon synapses, emphasizing the physiological relevance of these RIBEYE-containing aggregates. Based on the identified multiple RIBEYE–RIBEYE interactions, we provide a molecular mechanism for the dynamic assembly of synaptic ribbons from individual RIBEYE subunits.

We report the cloning and functional characterization of myopodin, the second member of the synaptopodin gene family. Myopodin shows no significant homology to any known protein except synaptopodin. Northern blot analysis resulted in a 3.6-kb transcript for mouse skeletal and heart muscle. Western blots showed an 80-kD signal for skeletal and a 95-kD signal for heart muscle. Myopodin contains one PPXY motif and multiple PXXP motifs. Myopodin colocalizes with α-actinin and is found at the Z-disc as shown by immunogold electron microscopy. In myoblasts, myopodin shows preferential nuclear localization. During myotube differentiation, myopodin binds to stress fibers in a punctuated pattern before incorporation into the Z-disc. Myopodin can directly bind to actin and contains a novel actin binding site in the center of the protein. Myopodin has actin-bundling activity as shown by formation of latrunculin-A–sensitive cytosolic actin bundles and nuclear actin loops in transfected cells expressing green fluorescent protein–myopodin. Under stress conditions, myopodin accumulates in the nucleus and is depleted from the cytoplasm. Nuclear export of myopodin is sensitive to leptomycin B, despite the absence of a classical nuclear export sequence. We propose a dual role for myopodin as a structural protein also participating in signaling pathways between the Z-disc and the nucleus.

Previous reports indicate that endothelial fenestrae in vitro can form by fusion of caveolae or caveolae-like vesicles. The principal aim of this study was to determine whether formation of glomerular endothelial cell fenestrae in vivo similarly involves caveolae and caveolin-1. Whereas caveolin-1 immunofluorescence was found around the circumference of human and mouse glomerular capillary loops, it co-localized only partially with the endothelium-specific lectin Ulex Europaeus I in human glomeruli, leaving portions of the endothelium devoid of caveolin-1. Immunogold electron microscopy, used to definitively localize caveolin-1 in glomeruli, showed that caveolin-1 was completely excluded from the fenestrated portion of the endothelium. Moreover, in caveolin-1–deficient mice, which cannot form caveolae, the ultrastructure of glomerular endothelial fenestrae appeared entirely normal. Interestingly, strong caveolin-1 immunogold labeling was observed in podocytes, where some caveolin-1 localized to filtration slits. Caveolin-1 co-immunoprecipitated with the podocyte slit diaphragm proteins nephrin and CD2AP, and dual immunofluorescence confirmed co-localization of caveolin-1 and nephrin. Nevertheless, in caveolin-1–deficient mice, podocyte ultrastructure appeared normal, and the podocyte proteins synaptopodin, nephrin, and podocin were expressed normally. In addition, blood urea nitrogen concentrations and urinary protein excretion in these mice were similar to those in wild-type mice. Thus, unlike caveolae formation, glomerular endothelial cell fenestrae formation in vivo does not require caveolin-1, ruling out the previous hypothesis that endothelial fenestrae represent fused caveolae, at least for glomerular endothelial cells. Localization of caveolin-1 to podocytes and their filtration slits is consistent with the view that the filtration slit plasma membrane represents a type of lipid raft microdomain.