Mario Mauthe

Mario Mauthe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2018 in Autophagy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMario Mauthe
Mario Mauthe
IOIdil Orhon
Idil Orhon
CRCecilia Rocchi
Cecilia Rocchi
XZXingdong Zhou
Xingdong Zhou
MLMorten Luhr
Morten Luhr
FRFulvio Reggiori
Fulvio Reggiori
Macroautophagy/autophagy is a conserved transport pathway where targeted structures are sequestered by phagophores, which mature into autophagosomes, and then delivered into lysosomes for degradation. Autophagy is involved in the pathophysiology of numerous diseases and its modulation is beneficial for the outcome of numerous specific diseases. Several lysosomal inhibitors such as bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), protease inhibitors and chloroquine (CQ), have been used interchangeably to block autophagy in in vitro experiments assuming that they all primarily block lysosomal degradation. Among them, only CQ and its derivate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are FDA-approved drugs and are thus currently the principal compounds used in clinical trials aimed to treat tumors through autophagy inhibition. However, the precise mechanism of how CQ blocks autophagy remains to be firmly demonstrated. In this study, we focus on how CQ inhibits autophagy and directly compare its effects to those of BafA1. We show that CQ mainly inhibits autophagy by impairing autophagosome fusion with lysosomes rather than by affecting the acidity and/or degradative activity of this organelle. Furthermore, CQ induces an autophagy-independent severe disorganization of the Golgi and endo-lysosomal systems, which might contribute to the fusion impairment. Strikingly, HCQ-treated mice also show a Golgi disorganization in kidney and intestinal tissues. Altogether, our data reveal that CQ and HCQ are not bona fide surrogates for other types of late stage lysosomal inhibitors for in vivo experiments. Moreover, the multiple cellular alterations caused by CQ and HCQ call for caution when interpreting results obtained by blocking autophagy with this drug.

3 June 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAliaksandr Khaminets
Aliaksandr Khaminets
THTheresa Heinrich
Theresa Heinrich
MMMuriel Mari
Muriel Mari
PGPaolo Grumati
Paolo Grumati
AHAntje K. Huebner
Antje K. Huebner
IDIvan Dikic
Ivan Dikic

22 July 2012 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KVKristan E. van der Vos
Kristan E. van der Vos
PEPernilla Eliasson
Pernilla Eliasson
Tassula Proikas-CezanneTassula Proikas-Cezanne
Tassula Proikas-Cezanne
SVStephin J. Vervoort
Stephin J. Vervoort
RBRuben van Boxtel
Ruben van Boxtel
PCPaul J. Coffer
Paul J. Coffer

26 July 2020 in EMBO Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ENEliise Laura Nirk
Eliise Laura Nirk
FRFulvio Reggiori
Fulvio Reggiori
MMMario Mauthe
Mario Mauthe
Initially used as antimalarial drugs, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and, to a lesser extent, chloroquine (CQ) are currently being used to treat several diseases. Due to its cost‐effectiveness, safety and efficacy, HCQ is especially used in rheumatic autoimmune disorders (RADs), such as systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Despite this widespread use in the clinic, HCQ molecular modes of action are still not completely understood. By influencing several cellular pathways through different mechanisms, CQ and HCQ inhibit multiple endolysosomal functions, including autophagy, as well as endosomal Toll‐like receptor activation and calcium signalling. These effects alter several aspects of the immune system with the synergistic consequence of reducing pro‐inflammatory cytokine production and release, one of the most marked symptoms of RADs. Here, we review the current knowledge on the molecular modes of action of these drugs and the circumstances under which they trigger side effects. This is of particular importance as the therapeutic use of HCQ is expanding beyond the treatment of malaria and RADs.

1 December 2011 in Autophagy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMario Mauthe
Mario Mauthe
AJAnke Jacob
Anke Jacob
SFSandra Freiberger
Sandra Freiberger
KHKatharina Hentschel
Katharina Hentschel
YSYork-Dieter Stierhof
York-Dieter Stierhof
Tassula Proikas-CezanneTassula Proikas-Cezanne
Tassula Proikas-Cezanne
Canonical autophagy is positively regulated by the Beclin 1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase class III (PtdIns3KC3) complex that generates an essential phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns(3)P), for the formation of autophagosomes. Previously, we identified the human WIPI protein family and found that WIPI-1 specifically binds PtdIns(3)P, accumulates at the phagophore and becomes a membrane protein of generated autophagosomes. Combining siRNA-mediated protein downregulation with automated high through-put analysis of PtdIns(3)P-dependent autophagosomal membrane localization of WIPI-1, we found that WIPI-1 functions upstream of both Atg7 and Atg5, and stimulates an increase of LC3-II upon nutrient starvation. Resveratrol-mediated autophagy was shown to enter autophagic degradation in a noncanonical manner, independent of Beclin 1 but dependent on Atg7 and Atg5. By using electron microscopy, LC3 lipidation and GFP-LC3 puncta-formation assays we confirmed these results and found that this effect is partially wortmannin-insensitive. In line with this, resveratrol did not promote phagophore localization of WIPI-1, WIPI-2 or the Atg16L complex above basal level. In fact, the presence of resveratrol in nutrient-free conditions inhibited phagophore localization of WIPI-1. Nevertheless, we found that resveratrol-mediated autophagy functionally depends on canonical-driven LC3-II production, as shown by siRNA-mediated downregulation of WIPI-1 or WIPI-2. From this it is tempting to speculate that resveratrol promotes noncanonical autophagic degradation downstream of the PtdIns(3)P-WIPI-Atg7-Atg5 pathway, by engaging a distinct subset of LC3-II that might be generated at membrane origins apart from canonical phagophore structures.

30 July 2013 in Traffic
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJovanka Bestebroer
Jovanka Bestebroer
PVPhilip V'kovski
Philip V'kovski
MMMario Mauthe
Mario Mauthe
FRFulvio Reggiori
Fulvio Reggiori