Uranium is a risk-driving radionuclide in both radioactive waste disposal and contaminated land scenarios. In these environments, a range of biogeochemical processes can occur, including sulfate reduction, which can induce sulfidation of iron (oxyhydr)oxide mineral phases. During sulfidation, labile U(VI) is known to reduce to relatively immobile U(IV); however, the detailed mechanisms of the changes in U speciation during these biogeochemical reactions are poorly constrained. Here, we performed highly controlled sulfidation experiments at pH 7 and pH 9.5 on U(VI) adsorbed to ferrihydrite and investigated the system using geochemical analyses, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and computational modeling. Analysis of the XAS data indicated the formation of a novel, transient U(VI)–persulfide complex as an intermediate species during the sulfidation reaction, concomitant with the transient release of uranium to the solution. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) modeling showed that a persulfide ligand was coordinated in the equatorial plane of the uranyl moiety, and formation of this species was supported by computational modeling. The final speciation of U was nanoparticulate U(IV) uraninite, and this phase was evident at 2 days at pH 7 and 1 year at pH 9.5. Our identification of a new, labile U(VI)-persulfide species under environmentally relevant conditions may have implications for U mobility in sulfidic environments pertinent to radioactive waste disposal and contaminated land scenarios.
Zirconolite is considered to be a suitable wasteform material for the immobilization of Pu and other minor actinide species produced through advanced nuclear separations. Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of Dy3+ incorporation within the self-charge balancing zirconolite Ca1–xZr1–xDy2xTi2O7 solid solution, with the view to simulate trivalent minor actinide immobilization. Compositions in the substitution range 0.10 ≤ x ≤ 1.00 (Δx = 0.10) were fabricated by a conventional mixed oxide synthesis, with a two-step sintering regime at 1400 °C in air for 48 h. Three distinct coexisting phase fields were identified, with single-phase zirconolite-2M identified only for x = 0.10. A structural transformation from zirconolite-2M to zirconolite-4M occurred in the range 0.20 ≤ x ≤ 0.30, while a mixed-phase assemblage of zirconolite-4M and cubic pyrochlore was evident at Dy concentrations 0.40 ≤ x ≤ 0.50. Compositions for which x ≥ 0.60 were consistent with single-phase pyrochlore. The formation of zirconolite-4M and pyrochlore polytype phases, with increasing Dy content, was confirmed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, coupled with selected area electron diffraction. Analysis of the Dy L3-edge XANES region confirmed that Dy was present uniformly as Dy3+, remaining analogous to Am3+. Fitting of the EXAFS region was consistent with Dy3+ cations distributed across both Ca2+ and Zr4+ sites in both zirconolite-2M and 4M, in agreement with the targeted self-compensating substitution scheme, whereas Dy3+ was 8-fold coordinated in the pyrochlore structure. The observed phase fields were contextualized within the existing literature, demonstrating that phase transitions in CaZrTi2O7–REE3+Ti2O7 binary solid solutions are fundamentally controlled by the ratio of ionic radius of REE3+ cations.
23 March 2021 in Environmental Science & Technology
Over 60 years of nuclear activity have resulted in a global legacy of contaminated land and radioactive waste. Uranium (U) is a significant component of this legacy and is present in radioactive wastes and at many contaminated sites. U-incorporated iron (oxyhydr)oxides may provide a long-term barrier to U migration in the environment. However, reductive dissolution of iron (oxyhydr)oxides can occur on reaction with aqueous sulfide (sulfidation), a common environmental species, due to the microbial reduction of sulfate. In this work, U(VI)-goethite was initially reacted with aqueous sulfide, followed by a reoxidation reaction, to further understand the long-term fate of U species under fluctuating environmental conditions. Over the first day of sulfidation, a transient release of aqueous U was observed, likely due to intermediate uranyl(VI)-persulfide species. Despite this, overall U was retained in the solid phase, with the formation of nanocrystalline U(IV)O2 in the sulfidized system along with a persistent U(V) component. On reoxidation, U was associated with an iron (oxyhydr)oxide phase either as an adsorbed uranyl (approximately 65%) or an incorporated U (35%) species. These findings support the overarching concept of iron (oxyhydr)oxides acting as a barrier to U migration in the environment, even under fluctuating redox conditions.
This is the first comprehensive study to compare the long term stability of U and Sr (bio)remediation end-points following oxidative remobilisation ( via oxygen/nitrate) yielding insights into retention capabilities and removal mechanisms.