Mycobacterium abscessus is one of the most common and pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolated in clinical laboratories. It consists of three subspecies: M. abscessus subsp. abscessus , M. abscessus subsp. bolletii , and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense .

Bacteria belonging to the genus Achromobacter are increasingly isolated from respiratory samples of people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF). The management of this multidrug-resistant genus is challenging and characterised by a lack of international recommendations, therapeutic guidelines and data concerning antibiotic susceptibility, especially concerning the newer antibiotics. The objective of this study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of Achromobacter isolates from PWCF, including susceptibility to new antibiotics. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 22 antibiotics were determined for a panel of 23 Achromobacter isolates from 19 respiratory samples of PWCF. Two microdilution MIC plates were used: EUMDROXF^® plate (Sensititre) and Micronaut-S Pseudomonas MIC^® plate (Merlin) and completed by a third method if necessary (E-test^® or UMIC^®). Among usual antimicrobial agents, the most active was imipenem (70% susceptibility). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin and tigecycline (65%, 56% and 52% susceptibility, respectively) were still useful for the treatment of Achromobacter infections. Among new therapeutic options, β-lactams combined with a β-lactamase-inhibitor did not bring benefits compared to β-lactam alone. On the other hand, cefiderocol appeared as a promising therapeutic alternative for managing Achromobacter infections in PWCF. This study provides the first results on the susceptibility of clinical Achromobacter isolates concerning new antibiotics. More microbiological and clinical data are required to establish the optimal treatment of Achromobacter infections.

Achromobacter spp. are nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli mainly studied among cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The identification of the 19 species within the genus is time-consuming ( nrdA -sequencing), thus data concerning the distribution of the species are limited to specific studies.

Point-of-care syndromic PCR (POC SPCR) assays are useful tools for the rapid detection of the most common causative agents of community-acquired infections responsible for meningitis and encephalitis infections. We evaluated the performance characteristics of the new QIAstat-Dx^® Meningitis/Encephalitis panel (QS) compared to the laboratory reference methods and the POC SPCR Biofire^® FilmArray^® Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (FA). Viral (Enterovirus, Parechovirus, HSV-1, HSV-2, HHV-6, VZV) and bacterial (E. coli K1, H. influenzae, L. monocytogenes, encapsulated N. meningitidis, M. pneumoniae, S. agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes) pathogens were suspended at low concentrations and tested with the POC SPCR systems. The reproducibility, analytical specificity, carryover contamination, interferences and clinical samples were evaluated. All samples tested positive with both QS and FA except for those containing the lowest concentrations of Enterovirus-D68-B3, Echovirus-30 and S. agalactiae which were only detected by FA. In terms of analytical specificity, we observed 3 false positive results out of 48 QS tests versus 1 out of 37 FA tests. For the other studied criteria, both QS and FA performed as expected. Our results suggest that the performance characteristics of QS are close to those of FA. A prospective multicenter study would be useful to complete the performances evaluation of QS.