Tomasz Płoszaj

Dr. Tomasz Płoszaj

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Redox Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJulita Pietrzak
Julita Pietrzak
CSCorinne Spickett
Corinne Spickett
TPTomasz Płoszaj
Tomasz Płoszaj
LVLászló Virág
László Virág
Agnieszka Zdzislawa RobaszkiewiczAgnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Agnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Although electrophiles are considered as detrimental to cells, accumulating recent evidence indicates that proliferating non-cancerous and particularly cancerous cells utilize these agents for pro-survival and cell cycle promoting signaling. Hence, the redox shift to mild oxidant release must be balanced by multiple defense mechanisms. Our latest findings demonstrate that cell cycle progression, which dictates oxidant level in stress-free conditions, determines PARP1 transcription. Growth modulating factors regulate CDK4/6-RBs-E2Fs axis. In cells arrested in G1 and G0, RB1-E2F1 and RBL2-E2F4 dimers recruit chromatin remodelers such as HDAC1, SWI/SNF and PRC2 to condense chromatin and turn off transcription. Release of retinoblastoma-based repressive complexes from E2F-dependent gene promoters in response to cell transition to S phase enables transcription of PARP1. This enzyme contributes to repair of oxidative DNA damage by supporting several strand break repair pathways and nucleotide or base excision repair pathways, as well as acting as a co-activator of transcription factors such as NRF2 and HIF1a, which control expression of antioxidant enzymes involved in removal of electrophiles and secondary metabolites. Furthermore, PARP1 is indispensible for transcription of the pro-survival kinases MAP2K6, ERK1/2 and AKT1, and for maintaining MAPK activity by suppressing transcription of the MAPK inhibitor, MPK1. In summary, cell cycle controlled PARP1 transcription helps cells to adapt to a pro-oxidant redox shift.

17 February 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Agnieszka Zdzislawa RobaszkiewiczAgnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Agnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
CQChao Qu
Chao Qu
EWEwelina Wisnik
Ewelina Wisnik
TPTomasz Płoszaj
Tomasz Płoszaj
AMAli Mirsaidi
Ali Mirsaidi
Michael O. HottigerMichael O. Hottiger
Michael O. Hottiger
While ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like 1 (ARTD1, formerly PARP1) and its enzymatic activity have been shown to be important for reprogramming and differentiation of cells, such as during adipogenesis, their role and mechanism in regulating osteoclastogenesis and bone homeostasis are largely unknown. Here, in cell culture-based RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis models, we show that silencing of ARTD1 or inhibition of its enzymatic activity enhances osteoclast differentiation and function. As a consequence of ARTD1 silencing or inhibition, the recruitment of p65/RelA to the IL-1β promoter, which is associated with transcriptionally active histone marks, IL-1β expression and inflammasome-dependent secretion of IL-1β are enhanced. This subsequently promotes sustained induction of the transcription factor Nfatc1/A and osteoclastogenesis in an autocrine manner via the IL-1 receptor. In vivo, Artd1-deficient mice display significantly decreased bone mass as a consequence of increased osteoclast differentiation. Accordingly, the expression of osteoclast markers is enhanced in mutant compared to wild-type mice. Together, these results indicate that ARTD1 controls osteoclast development and bone remodelling via its enzymatic activity by modulating the epigenetic marks surrounding the IL-1β promoter and expression of IL-1β and subsequently also Nfatc1/A.

4 February 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMaciej Sobczak
Maciej Sobczak
JPJulita Pietrzak
Julita Pietrzak
TPTomasz Płoszaj
Tomasz Płoszaj
Agnieszka Zdzislawa RobaszkiewiczAgnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Agnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Cancer malignancy is usually characterized by unlimited self-renewal. In some types of advanced tumors that are rapidly dividing, gene expression profiles depict elevations in pro-proliferative genes accompanied by coordinately elevated transcription of factors responsible for removal of DNA lesions. In our studies, fast proliferating breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF7), BRG1, a component of the SWI/SNF complex, emerges as an activator of functionally-linked genes responsible for activities such as mitotic cell divisions and DNA repair. Products of at least some of them are considerably overrepresented in breast cancer cells and BRG1 facilitates growth of MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. BRG1 occurs at the promoters of genes such as CDK4, LIG1, and NEIL3, which are transcriptionally controlled by cell cycle progression and highly acetylated by EP300 in proliferating cells. As previously documented, in dividing cells BRG1 directly activates gene transcription by evicting EP300 modified nucleosomes from the promoters and, thereby, relaxing chromatin. However, the deficiency of BRG1 or EP300 activity for 48 h leads to cell growth arrest and to chromatin compaction, but also to the assembly of RB1/HDAC1/EZH2 complexes at the studied cell cycle-dependent gene promoters. Epigenetic changes include histone deacetylation and accumulation of H3K27me trimethylation, both known to repress transcription. Cell cycle arrest in G1 by inhibition of CDK4/6 phenocopies the effect of the long-term BRG1 inhibition on the chromatin structure. These results suggest that BRG1 may control gene transcription also by promoting expression of genes responsible for cell cycle progression in the studied breast cancer cells. In the current study, we show that BRG1 binding occurs at the promoters of functionally linked genes in proliferating breast cancer cells, revealing a new mechanism by which BRG1 defines gene transcription.

1 February 2019 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJulita Pietrzak
Julita Pietrzak
TPTomasz Płoszaj
Tomasz Płoszaj
LPLukasz Pulaski
Lukasz Pulaski
Agnieszka Zdzislawa RobaszkiewiczAgnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Agnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz

1 February 2019 in Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PTPaulina Tokarz
Paulina Tokarz
TPTomasz Płoszaj
Tomasz Płoszaj
ZRZsolt Regdon
Zsolt Regdon
LVLászló Virág
László Virág
Agnieszka Zdzislawa RobaszkiewiczAgnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz
Agnieszka Zdzislawa Robaszkiewicz

25 February 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWiesław Lorkiewicz
Wiesław Lorkiewicz
TPTomasz Płoszaj
Tomasz Płoszaj
KJKrystyna Jędrychowska-Dańska
Krystyna Jędrychowska-Dańska
EŻElżbieta Żądzińska
Elżbieta Żądzińska
DSDominik Strapagiel
Dominik Strapagiel
HWHenryk W. Witas
Henryk W. Witas
For a long time, anthropological and genetic research on the Neolithic revolution in Europe was mainly concentrated on the mechanism of agricultural dispersal over different parts of the continent. Recently, attention has shifted towards population processes that occurred after the arrival of the first farmers, transforming the genetically very distinctive early Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture (LBK) and Mesolithic forager populations into present-day Central Europeans. The latest studies indicate that significant changes in this respect took place within the post-Linear Pottery cultures of the Early and Middle Neolithic which were a bridge between the allochthonous LBK and the first indigenous Neolithic culture of north-central Europe—the Funnel Beaker culture (TRB). The paper presents data on mtDNA haplotypes of a Middle Neolithic population dated to 4700/4600–4100/4000 BC belonging to the Brześć Kujawski Group of the Lengyel culture (BKG) from the Kuyavia region in north-central Poland. BKG communities constituted the border of the “Danubian World” in this part of Europe for approx. seven centuries, neighboring foragers of the North European Plain and the southern Baltic basin. MtDNA haplogroups were determined in 11 individuals, and four mtDNA macrohaplogroups were found (H, U5, T, and HV0). The overall haplogroup pattern did not deviate from other post-Linear Pottery populations from central Europe, although a complete lack of N1a and the presence of U5a are noteworthy. Of greatest importance is the observed link between the BKG and the TRB horizon, confirmed by an independent analysis of the craniometric variation of Mesolithic and Neolithic populations inhabiting central Europe. Estimated phylogenetic pattern suggests significant contribution of the post-Linear BKG communities to the origin of the subsequent Middle Neolithic cultures, such as the TRB.