Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, resulting in substantial socio-economic burden for healthcare systems. With advances in artificial intelligence, visual image information can be processed into numerous quantitative features in an objective, repeatable and high-throughput fashion, in a process known as radiomics analysis (RA). Recently, investigators have attempted to apply RA to stroke neuroimaging in the hope of promoting personalized precision medicine. This review aimed to evaluate the role of RA as an adjuvant tool in the prognosis of disability after stroke. We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed and Embase using the keywords: ‘magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)’, ‘radiomics’, and ‘stroke’. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Radiomics quality score (RQS) was also applied to evaluate the methodological quality of radiomics studies. Of the 150 abstracts returned by electronic literature research, 6 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five studies evaluated predictive value for different predictive models (PMs). In all studies, the combined PMs consisting of clinical and radiomics features have achieved the best predictive performance compared to PMs based only on clinical or radiomics features, the results varying from an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75–0.86) to an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97). The median RQS of the included studies was 15, reflecting a moderate methodological quality. Assessing the risk of bias using PROBAST, potential high risk of bias in participants selection was identified. Our findings suggest that combined models integrating both clinical and advanced imaging variables seem to better predict the patients’ disability outcome group (favorable outcome: modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 2 and unfavorable outcome: mRS > 2) at three and six months after stroke. Although radiomics studies’ findings are significant in research field, these results should be validated in multiple clinical settings in order to help clinicians to provide individual patients with optimal tailor-made treatment.

Glucose transporter type 1 (Glut1) is the main transporter involved in the cellular uptake of glucose into many tissues, and is highly expressed in the brain and in erythrocytes. Glut1 deficiency syndrome is caused mainly by mutations of the SLC2A1 gene, impairing passive glucose transport across the blood–brain barrier. All age groups, from infants to adults, may be affected, with age-specific symptoms. In its classic form, the syndrome presents as an early-onset drug-resistant metabolic epileptic encephalopathy with a complex movement disorder and developmental delay. In later-onset forms, complex motor disorder predominates, with dystonia, ataxia, chorea or spasticity, often triggered by fasting. Diagnosis is confirmed by hypoglycorrhachia (below 45 mg/dL) with normal blood glucose, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and genetic analysis showing pathogenic SLC2A1 variants. There are also ongoing positive studies on erythrocytes’ Glut1 surface expression using flow cytometry. The standard treatment still consists of ketogenic therapies supplying ketones as alternative brain fuel. Anaplerotic substances may provide alternative energy sources. Understanding the complex interactions of Glut1 with other tissues, its signaling function for brain angiogenesis and gliosis, and the complex regulation of glucose transportation, including compensatory mechanisms in different tissues, will hopefully advance therapy. Ongoing research for future interventions is focusing on small molecules to restore Glut1, metabolic stimulation, and SLC2A1 transfer strategies. Newborn screening, early identification and treatment could minimize the neurodevelopmental disease consequences. Furthermore, understanding Glut1 relative deficiency or inhibition in inflammation, neurodegenerative disorders, and viral infections including COVID-19 and other settings could provide clues for future therapeutic approaches.

BACKGROUND: Stroke-induced aphasia significantly impacts communication and quality of life. Despite the standard treatment being speech and language therapy, outcomes vary, highlighting the need for additional therapies. Cerebrolysin, a neuroprotective and neurotrophic agent, has shown potential in stroke management. This study addresses the notable gap in research about the combined use of Cerebrolysin and speech therapy, evaluating their synergistic potential in the treatment of aphasia. METHODS: The ESCAS trial (The Efficacy and Safety of Cerebrolysin in the Treatment of Aphasia After Acute Ischemic Stroke), a prospective, randomized-controlled, double-blinded study was conducted in 2 Romanian stroke centers. Participants included those with left middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke and nonfluent aphasia, enrolled 3 to 5 days poststroke. Inclusion criteria were right-handedness and Romanian as the mother tongue. Participants received Cerebrolysin or a placebo combined with speech and language therapy in 10-day cycles over 3 intervals, and evaluations were done at baseline, 30, 60, and 90 days respectively. The main outcome measure was Western Aphasia Battery for language function. Changes at days 30, 60, and 90 compared with baseline were quantified, and the effect estimand used was the difference in means between groups. Secondary outcome measurements were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for neurological deficit, the modified Rankin Scale for global disability, and the Barthel Index for activities of daily living. RESULTS: Out of 132 enrolled patients, 123 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 120 in the per-protocol analysis. Overall, both groups showed improvement at subsequent visits compared with the baseline for Western Aphasia Battery and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The Cerebrolysin group showed greater improvements in Western Aphasia Battery (visit 4 mean increase of 35.579±16.316 [95% CI, 31.289–39.869] points; P <0.001) compared with the placebo group (20.774±12.486 [95% CI, 17.603–23.945] points; P <0.001), a difference in means of 14.805 (95% CI, 9.521–20.089) points ( P <0.001). The Cerebrolysin group also showed significant improvements (higher decreases) in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores compared with the placebo group (2.085 [95% CI, 1.076–3.094] points; P <0.001). Safety analysis raised no concerns (number of patients with adverse events P =0.105, number of adverse events per patient P =0.134). Additionally, the Cerebrolysin group showed greater improvements in functional independence (Barthel Index) and a trend toward reduced disability (modified Rankin Scale) compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrolysin combined with speech and language therapy offers promising potential for enhancing recovery in poststroke nonfluent aphasia. Significant improvements were observed in language and neurological deficits, underscoring the importance of adjunctive therapies in nonfluent aphasia rehabilitation. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to fully establish the efficacy of this combination therapy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.isrctn.com ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN54581790.

Romania has one of the highest incidences of stroke and one of the highest mortality rates in Europe. The mortality rate due to treatable causes is also very high and is associated with the lowest public spending on healthcare in the European Union. Nonetheless, significant achievements in acute stroke care have been made in Romania in the last 5 years, most notably the increase of the national thrombolysis rate from 0.8% to 5.4%. Numerous educational workshops and constant communication with the stroke centers led to a solid and active stroke network. Due to the joint efforts of this stroke network and the ESO-EAST project, the quality of stroke care has significantly improved. However, Romania still faces many problems: a major lack of specialists in interventional neuroradiology and consequently a low number of stroke patients treated by thrombectomy and carotid revascularization procedures, a low number of neuro-rehabilitation centers and a country-wide lack of neurologists.

Background: Health policies in transitioning health systems are rarely informed by the economic burden of disease due to scanty access to data. This study aimed to estimate direct and indirect costs for first-ever acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during the first year for patients residing in Cluj, Romania, and hospitalized in 2019 at the County Emergency Hospital (CEH). Methods: The study was conducted using a mixed, retrospective costing methodology from a societal perspective to measure the cost of first-ever AIS in the first year after onset. Patient pathways for AIS were reconstructed to aid in mapping inpatient and outpatient cost items. We used anonymized administrative and clinical data at the hospital level and publicly available databases. Results: The average cost per patient in the first year after stroke onset was RON 25,297.83 (EUR 5226.82), out of which 80.87% were direct costs. The total cost in Cluj, Romania in 2019 was RON 17,455,502.7 (EUR 3,606,505.8). Conclusions: Our costing exercise uncovered shortcomings of stroke management in Romania, particularly related to acute care and neurorehabilitation service provision. Romania spends significantly less on healthcare than other countries (5.5% of GDP vs. 9.8% European Union average), exposing stroke survivors to a disproportionately high risk for preventable and treatable post-stroke disability.

Denis Pavăl, Nicoleta Gherghel-Pavăl, Octavia Oana Căpățînă, Adina Stan, Lajos Raduly, Liviuța Budișan, Ioana Valentina Micluția. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2024;22:520-30. https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.24.1164