Increasing use of covalent and noncovalent inhibitors of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) has elucidated a series of acquired drug-resistant BTK mutations in patients with B cell malignancies. Here we identify inhibitor resistance mutations in BTK with distinct enzymatic activities, including some that impair BTK enzymatic activity while imparting novel protein-protein interactions that sustain B cell receptor (BCR) signaling. Furthermore, we describe a clinical-stage BTK and IKZF1/3 degrader, NX-2127, that can bind and proteasomally degrade each mutant BTK proteoform, resulting in potent blockade of BCR signaling. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with NX-2127 achieves >80% degradation of BTK in patients and demonstrates proof-of-concept therapeutic benefit. These data reveal an oncogenic scaffold function of mutant BTK that confers resistance across clinically approved BTK inhibitors but is overcome by BTK degradation in patients.

Development of targeted therapies in recent years revealed several nonchemotherapeutic options for patients. Chief among targeted therapies is small molecule kinase inhibitors targeting key oncogenic signaling proteins. Through competitive and noncompetitive inhibition of these kinases, and therefore the pathways they activate, cancers can be slowed or completely eradicated, leading to partial or complete remissions for many cancer types. Unfortunately, for many patients, resistance to targeted therapies, such as kinase inhibitors, ultimately develops and can necessitate multiple lines of treatment. Drug resistance can either be de novo or acquired after months or years of drug exposure. Since resistance can be due to several unique mechanisms, there is no one-size-fits-all solution to this problem. However, combinations that target complimentary pathways or potential escape mechanisms appear to be more effective than sequential therapy. Combinations of single kinase inhibitors or alternately multikinase inhibitor drugs could be used to achieve this goal. Understanding how to efficiently target cancer cells and overcome resistance to prior lines of therapy became imperative to the success of cancer treatment. Due to the complexity of cancer, effective treatment options in the future will likely require mixing and matching these approaches in different cancer types and different disease stages.

Covalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) have led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These targeted oral therapies are administered as standard treatments in both the front-line and relapsed and/or refractory settings. Given their administration as a continuous therapy with a “treat-to-progression” strategy, limitations of their use include discontinuation due to toxicity or from progression of the disease. Non-covalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ncBTKi) distinguish themselves by binding reversibly to the BTK target, which may address the limitations of toxicity and acquired resistance seen with cBTKi. Several ncBTKis have been studied preclinically and in clinical trials, including pirtobrutinib and nemtabrutinib. Pirtobrutinib, which is now FDA approved for relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), has shown outstanding safety and preliminary efficacy in CLL in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials, with phase 3 trials underway. This agent may fill an unmet medical need for CLL patients requiring treatment after a cBTKi. Pirtobrutinib is particularly promising for the treatment of “double exposed” CLL, defined as CLL requiring treatment after both a cBTKi and venetoclax. Some patients have now developedacquired resistance to pirtobrutinib, and resistance mechanisms (including novel acquired mutations in BTK outside of the C481 position) have been recently described. Further study regarding the mechanisms of resistance to pirtobrutinib in patients without prior cBTKi exposure, as well as the potential for cross-resistance between cBTKi and ncBTKis, may be important to help inform where ncBTKis will ultimately fit in the treatment sequencing paradigm for CLL. An emerging clinical challenge is the treatment of CLL after ncBTKi discontinuation. Novel therapeutic strategies are being investigated to address the treatment of patients following disease progression on ncBTKis. Such strategies include novel agents (BTK degraders, bispecific antibody therapy, CAR T-cell therapy, PKC-beta inhibitors) as well as combination approaches incorporating a ncBTKi (e.g., pirtobrutinib and venetoclax) that may help overcome this acquired resistance.

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays a key role in the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway and confers anti-apoptotic and proliferative properties to malignant B-cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Small molecule BTK inhibitors were designed to bind BTK’s active site and block downstream signaling. These drugs have now been used in the treatment of thousands of patients with CLL, the most common form of leukemia in the western hemisphere. However, adverse effects of early generations of BTK inhibitors and resistance to treatment have led to the development of newer, more selective and non-covalent BTK inhibitors. As the use of these newer generation BTK inhibitors has increased, novel BTK resistance mutations have come to light. This review aims to discuss previously known and novel BTK mutations, their mechanisms of resistance, and their relationship with patient treatment. Also discussed here are future studies that are needed to investigate the underlying cause allowing these mutations to occur and how they incite resistance. New treatments on the horizon that attempt to maneuver around these resistance mutations can be met with new resistance mutations, creating an unmet need for patients with CLL. Novel therapies and combinations that address all forms of resistance are discussed.

Vemurafenib, an oral BRAF inhibitor, has demonstrated high response rates in relapsed/refractory (R/R) hairy cell leukemia (HCL). However, little is known about long-term outcomes and response to retreatment. Herein, we report the results of 36 patients with R/R HCL treated with vemurafenib from the United States arm of the phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01711632). The best overall response rate was 86%, including 33% complete response (CR) and 53% partial response (PR). After a median follow-up of 40 months, 21 of 31 responders (68%) experienced relapse with a median relapse-free survival (RFS) of 19 months (range, 12.5-53.9 months). There was no significant difference in the RFS for patients with CR vs PR. Fourteen of 21 (67%) relapsed patients were retreated with vemurafenib, with 86% achieving complete hematologic response. Two patients acquired resistance to vemurafenib with the emergence of new KRAS and CDKN2A mutations, respectively. Six of 12 (50%) responders to vemurafenib retreatment experienced another relapse with a median RFS of 12.7 months. Overall survival (OS) was 82% at 4 years, with a significantly shorter OS in patients who relapsed within 1 year of initial treatment with vemurafenib. Higher cumulative doses or a longer duration of treatment did not lengthen the durability of response. All adverse events in the retreatment cohort were grade 1/2 except for 1 case of a grade 3 rash and 1 grade 3 fever/pneumonia. Our data suggest that vemurafenib retreatment is a safe and effective option for patients with R/R HCL.

Patients with multiple myeloma-bearing translocation t(11;14) have recently been shown to benefit from the apoptosis-inducing drug venetoclax; however, the drug lacks FDA approval in multiple myeloma thus far due to a potential safety signal in the overall patient population. Selinexor is an inhibitor of nuclear export that is FDA-approved for patients with multiple myeloma refractory to multiple lines of therapy. Here, we report that in four patients with multiple myeloma with t(11;14), the concomitant administration of venetoclax and selinexor was safe and associated with disease response. Moreover, the combination was synergistic in t(11;14) multiple myeloma cell lines and caused decreased levels of Cyclin D1 (which is overexpressed due to the CCND1-IGH fusion) when given in combination as compared to single agents. These data suggest that the combination of venetoclax and selinexor is effective and t(11;14) may serve as a therapeutic marker for response and target for future clinical trials.