Background: Esophageal cancer (ESCA) is a common malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. n6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulators have been widely recognized as one of the major causes of cancer development and progression. However, for ESCA, the role of regulators is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of m6A RNA methylation regulators in the immune regulation and prognosis of ESCA.Methods: RNA-seq data were downloaded using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and the expression differences of m6A RNA methylation regulators in ESCA were analyzed. Further m6A methylation regulator markers were constructed, and prognostic and predictive values were assessed using survival analysis and nomograms. Patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups. The signature was evaluated in terms of survival, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), copy number variation (CNV), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and functional enrichment analysis (TMB). The m6A expression of key genes in clinical specimens was validated using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).Results: In ESCA tissues, most of the 23 regulators were significantly differentially expressed. LASSO regression analysis included 7 m6A-related factors (FMR1, RBMX, IGFBP1, IGFBP2, ALKBH5, RBM15B, METTL14). In addition, this study also identified that the risk model is associated with biological functions, including base metabolism, DNA repair, and mismatch repair. In this study, a nomogram was created to predict the prognosis of ESCA patients. Bioinformatics analysis of human ESCA and normal tissues was performed using qRT-PCR. Finally. Seven genetic features were found to be associated with m6A in ESCA patients. The results of this study suggest that three different clusters of m6A modifications are involved in the immune microenvironment of ESCA, providing important clues for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Background and aim: To evaluate the impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube on nutritional status, treatment-related toxicity, and treatment tolerance in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who underwent chemoradiotherapy. Patients and methods: We enrolled 133 consecutive non-metastatic NPC (III/IV stage) patients, who were treated with prophylactic PEG feeding before the initiation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between June 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014. Meanwhile, another 133 non-PEG patients, who were matched for age, gender, and tumor, node, metastases stage, were selected as historical control cohort. Weight and nutritional status changes from pre-radiotherapy to the end of radiotherapy were evaluated, and treatment tolerance and related acute toxicities were analyzed as well. Results: We found that significantly more patients (91.73%) in the PEG group could finish two cycles of CCRT, when compared with those in the non-PEG group (57.89%) (P<0.001). We also indicated that more patients (50.38%) in the non-PEG group experienced weight loss of ≥5%, while the phenomenon was only found in 36.09% patients in the PEG group (P=0.019). In addition, the percentage of patients who lost ≥10% of their weight was similar in these two groups. Changes in albumin and prealbumin levels during radiotherapy in the non-PEG group were higher than those obtained for the PEG group with significant differences (P-values of 0.023 and <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, patients in the PEG group had significantly lower incidence of grade III acute mucositis than those in the non-PEG group (22.56% vs 36.84%, P=0.011). Tube-related complications occurred only in 14 (10.53%) patients in the PEG group, including incision infection of various degrees. Conclusion: PEG and intensive nutrition support may help to minimize body weight loss, maintain nutritional status, and offer better treatment tolerance for patients with locally advanced NPC who underwent CCRT.

Globally, esophageal cancer (ECA) is the seventh most common cancer and sixth most common cause of cancer-associated mortality. However, there are no reliable prognostic and predictive molecular markers for ECA; in addition, the pathogenesis of ECA is not fully elucidated. The expressions of circular RNAs (circRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) of ECA and control groups were obtained from the RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data of our hospital, the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. Analyses of differentially expressed genes, the circRNA–miRNA–mRNA–competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, and functional/pathway enrichment were conducted. The key targets in the ceRNA network that showed significant results in survival Cox regression analyses were selected. Furthermore, analyses of immune infiltration and autophagy genes related to the key targets were performed. Seven circRNAs, 22 miRNAs, and 34 mRNAs were identified as vital genes in ECA; the nuclear factor-κ-gene binding (NF-κB) and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K-Akt) signaling were identified as the most enriched pathways. In addition, the LIM domain containing 2 (LIMD2) was an independent predictor of prognosis in ECA patients and closely associated with immunity and autophagy. Moreover, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) revealed significant upregulation of LIMD2 expression in ECA tissues. ECA may be closely correlated with NF-κB and PI3K/Akt signaling. In addition, LIMD2 could be a potential prognostic and predictive marker of ECA.

To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy. The population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups. P-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm³ being an optimal cut-off for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). GTVp ≥30 cm³ was a negative independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. PSM analyses confirmed the prognostic value of GTVp. For GTVp < 30 cm³, no significant survival differences were observed among the 3 treatments. For GTVp ≥30 cm³, the worst 5-year OS rate was experienced by those given surgery. The 5-year PFS rate of patients given combined radiotherapy and surgery was significantly better than that of patients given radiotherapy. The surgical complications of patients given the combined treatment were comparable to those who received surgery, but radiation side effects were significantly lower. GTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm³, radiotherapy plus surgery was more effective than either treatment alone.