Background: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (American College of Surgery (ACS-TQIP)) uses the existing infrastructure of the Committee on Trauma programs and provides feedback to participating hospitals on risk-adjusted outcomes. This study aimed to analyze and compare the performance of the Level I Hamad Trauma Centre (HTC) with other TQIP participating centers by comparing TQIP aggregate database reports. The primary goal was to pinpoint the variations in adult trauma outcomes and quality measures, identify areas that need improvement, and leverage existing resources to facilitate quality improvement. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for the TQIP data from April 2019–March 2020 to April 2020–March 2021. We used the TQIP methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and outcomes. Results: There were 915 patients from Fall 2020 and 884 patients from Fall 2021 that qualified for the TQIP database. The HTC patients’ demographics differed from the TQIP’s aggregate data; they were younger, more predominantly male, and had significantly different mechanisms of injury (MOI) with more traffic-related blunt trauma. Penetrating injuries were more severe in the other centers. During the TQIP Fall 2020 report, the HTC was a low outlier (good performer) in one cohort (all patients) and an average performer in the remaining cohorts. However, during Fall 2021, the HTC showed an improvement and was a low outlier in two cohorts (all patients and severe TBI patients). Overall, the HTC remained an average performer during the report cycles. Conclusions: There was an improvement over time in the risk-adjusted mortality, which reflects the continuous and demanding effort put together by the trauma team. The ACS-TQIP for the external benchmarking of quality improvement could be a contributor to better monitored patient care. Evaluating the TQIP data with emphases on appropriate methodologies, quality measurements, corrective measures, and accurate reporting is warranted.

Background: The trauma incidence follows specific patterns in different societies and is expected to increase over the weekend and nighttime. We aimed to explore and analyze the incidence, pattern, and severity of trauma at different times (working hours vs. out off-working hours, weekdays vs. weekends and season). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at a level 1 trauma facility in Qatar. All injured patients admitted between June 2017 and May 2018 were included. The data were analyzed to determine whether outcomes and care parameters of these patients differed between regular working hours and off-working hours, weekdays vs. weekends, and between season intervals. Results: During the study period, 2477 patients were admitted. A total of 816 (32.9%) patients presented during working hours and 1500 (60.6%) during off-working hours. Off-working hours presentations differed significantly with the injury severity score (ISS) (p < 0.001), ICU length of stay (p = 0.001), blood transfusions (p = 0.001), intubations (p = 0.001), mortality rate (9.7% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001), and disposition to rehabilitation centers. Weekend presentations were significantly associated with a higher ISS (p = 0.01), Priority 1 trauma activation (19.1% vs. 14.7%; p = 0005), and need for intubation (21% vs. 16%; p = 0.002). The length of stay (ICU and hospital), mortality, and disposition to rehabilitation centers and other clinical parameters did not show any significant differences. No significant seasonal variation was observed in terms of admissions at the trauma center. Conclusions: The off-working hours admission showed an apparent demographic effect in involved mechanisms, injury severity, and trauma activations, while outcomes, especially the mortality rate, were significantly different during nights but not during the weekends. The only observed seasonal effect was a decrease in the number of admissions during the summer break.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of abnormal rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) findings in trauma patients and investigate the relationships between FIBTEM-maximum clot firmness (MCF), fibrinogen concentration and patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult trauma patients who underwent on-admission ROTEM testing between January 2020 and January 2021. Univariate analyses compared data based on injury severity, ROTEM findings (normal vs. abnormal), and initial fibrinogen concentration (normal vs. hypofibrinogenemia). ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of FIBTEM A10/MCF for its association with hypofibrinogenemia. Results: A total of 1488 patients were included in this study; the mean age was 36.4 ± 14.2 years and 92% were male. In total, 376 (25.3%) patients had ROTEM abnormalities. Severe injuries (ISS ≥ 16) were associated with a higher shock index, positive troponin T levels, standard coagulation abnormalities, hypofibrinogenemia, and abnormal ROTEM parameters (p < 0.05). These patients also had higher rates of massive transfusions and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.001). Coagulation alterations were significantly associated with higher injury severity score (ISS), shock index, head abbreviated injury score (AIS), hypofibrinogenemia, transfusion need, and mortality (p < 0.05). Hypofibrinogenemic patients were younger, sustained severe injuries, had higher shock indices and coagulation marker levels, required more intensive treatments, had longer hospital stays, and had higher mortality (p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between plasma fibrinogen concentration and FIBTEM-MCF (r = 0.294; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Approximately one-fourth of the patients had early traumatic coagulopathy, as assessed by ROTEM. The FIBTEM A10/MCF may serves as a surrogate marker for plasma fibrinogen concentration. While prior studies have established the link between ROTEM and injury severity, our findings reinforce its relevance across varying trauma severity levels. However, prospective studies are warranted to validate its role within diverse trauma systems and evolving resuscitation protocols.

Background: Loss of muscle mass, and its strength, is associated with adverse outcomes in many medical and surgical conditions. Trauma patients may get malnourished during their hospital course due to many interrelated contributing factors. However, there is insufficient knowledge on the acute muscle and fat changes in young trauma patients in the early days post-admission. Objective: to explore the diagnosis, feeding status, and outcome of muscle mass loss among young abdominal polytrauma patients. Methods: It was a retrospective study including hospitalized abdominal trauma patients who underwent an abdominal computerized tomographic (CT) examination initially and a follow-up one week later. CT scan-based automatic and manual analysis of the muscles and fat of the abdominal region was calculated and compared. Also, we evaluated the feeding and nutritional values to explore the adequacy of the provided calories and proteins and the potential influence of enteral feeding on the CT-based parameters for muscle loss and fat depletion. Results: There were 138 eligible subjects with a mean age of 32.8 ± 13.5 years; of them, 92% were males. Operative interventions were performed on two-thirds of the patients, including abdominal surgery (43%), orthopedic surgeries (34%), and neurosurgical procedures (8.1%). On admission, 56% received oral feeding, and this rate slightly increased to 58.4% after the first week. Enteral feed was prescribed for the remaining, except for two patients. The percentage of change in the total psoas muscle area was significantly reduced after one week of admission in patients on enteral feed as compared to those in the oral feeding group (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the percentages of changes in the CT scan findings except for the total psoas muscle area (p = 0.001) and para-spinal muscle area (p = 0.02), which reduced significantly in the those who underwent laparotomy as compared to those who did not need laparotomy. Trauma patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery lost muscle and fat over time. Conclusions: Loss of muscle mass and body fat is not uncommon among young trauma patients. Patients who underwent laparotomy are more likely to be affected. Further larger studies are needed to assess the specific features in the younger trauma population and how far this can be influenced by the nutrition status and its impact on the clinical outcomes. It could be early or impending stages of sarcopenia linked to trauma patients, or just acute changes in the muscle and fat, that need further investigation and follow-up after hospital discharge.