Li-Chen Su

Li-Chen Su


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 January 2018 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYing-Feng Chang
Ying-Feng Chang
WWWen-Hung Wang
Wen-Hung Wang
YHYi-Wei Hong
Yi-Wei Hong
RYRuei-Yu Yuan
Ruei-Yu Yuan
KCKuan-Hsuan Chen
Kuan-Hsuan Chen
SWSheng-Fan Wang
Sheng-Fan Wang

23 May 2021 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYing-Feng Chang
Ying-Feng Chang
YCYi-Te Chou
Yi-Te Chou
CCChia-Yu Cheng
Chia-Yu Cheng
JHJen-Fu Hsu
Jen-Fu Hsu
LSLi-Chen Su
Li-Chen Su
AHAnnie Ho
Annie Ho

16 November 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMeng-Chi Li
Meng-Chi Li
KCKai-Ren Chen
Kai-Ren Chen
Chien-Cheng KuoChien-Cheng Kuo
Chien-Cheng Kuo
YLYu-Xen Lin
Yu-Xen Lin
LSLi-Chen Su
Li-Chen Su
The SPR phenomenon results in an abrupt change in the optical phase such that one can measure the phase shift of the reflected light as a sensing parameter. Moreover, many studies have demonstrated that the phase changes more acutely than the intensity, leading to a higher sensitivity to the refractive index change. However, currently, the optical phase cannot be measured directly because of its high frequency; therefore, investigators usually have to use complicated techniques for the extraction of phase information. In this study, we propose a simple and effective strategy for measuring the SPR phase shift based on phase-shift interferometry. In this system, the polarization-dependent interference signals are recorded simultaneously by a pixelated polarization camera in a single snapshot. Subsequently, the phase information can be effortlessly acquired by a phase extraction algorithm. Experimentally, the proposed phase-sensitive SPR sensor was successfully applied for the detection of small molecules of glyphosate, which is the most frequently used herbicide worldwide. Additionally, the sensor exhibited a detection limit of 15 ng/mL (0.015 ppm). Regarding its simplicity and effectiveness, we believe that our phase-sensitive SPR system presents a prospective method for acquiring phase signals.

27 April 2023 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lung-Chien ChenLung-Chien Chen
Lung-Chien Chen
MLMeng-Chi Li
Meng-Chi Li
KCKai-Ren Chen
Kai-Ren Chen
YCYu-Jui Cheng
Yu-Jui Cheng
XWXun-Ying Wu
Xun-Ying Wu
LSLi-Chen Su
Li-Chen Su

17 January 2025 in Analytica Chimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYing-Feng Chang
Ying-Feng Chang
YWYu-Chung Wang
Yu-Chung Wang
THTsung-Yu Huang
Tsung-Yu Huang
MLMeng-Chi Li
Meng-Chi Li
SCSin-You Chen
Sin-You Chen
KLKwei-Jay Lin
Kwei-Jay Lin

16 September 2022 in Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLChih‐Yen Lin
Chih‐Yen Lin
WWWen‐Hung Wang
Wen‐Hung Wang
MLMeng‐Chi Li
Meng‐Chi Li
YLYu‐Ting Lin
Yu‐Ting Lin
ZYZih‐Syuan Yang
Zih‐Syuan Yang
SWSheng-Fan Wang
Sheng-Fan Wang
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) virus emerged in late 2019 leading to the COVID‐19 disease pandemic that triggered socioeconomic turmoil worldwide. A precise, prompt, and affordable diagnostic assay is essential for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 as well as its variants. Antibody against SARS‐CoV‐2 spike (S) protein was reported as a suitable strategy for therapy and diagnosis of COVID‐19. We, therefore, developed a quick and precise phase‐sensitive surface plasmon resonance (PS‐SPR) biosensor integrated with a novel generated anti‐S monoclonal antibody (S‐mAb). Our results indicated that the newly generated S‐mAb could detect the original SARS‐CoV‐2 strain along with its variants. In addition, a SARS‐CoV‐2 pseudovirus, which could be processed in BSL‐2 facility was generated for evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the assays including PS‐SPR, homemade target‐captured ELISA, spike rapid antigen test (SRAT), and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Experimentally, PS‐SPR exerted high sensitivity to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 pseudovirus at 589 copies/ml, with 7‐fold and 70‐fold increase in sensitivity when compared with the two conventional immunoassays, including homemade target‐captured ELISA (4 × 103 copies/ml) and SRAT (4 × 104 copies/ml), using the identical antibody. Moreover, the PS‐SPR was applied in the measurement of mimic clinical samples containing the SARS‐CoV‐2 pseudovirus mixed with nasal mucosa. The detection limit of PS‐SPR is calculated to be 1725 copies/ml, which has higher accuracy than homemade target‐captured ELISA (4 × 104 copies/ml) and SRAT (4 × 105 copies/ml) and is comparable with qRT‐PCR (1250 copies/ml). Finally, the ability of PS‐SPR to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 in real clinical specimens was further demonstrated, and the assay time was less than 10 min. Taken together, our results indicate that this novel S‐mAb integrated into PS‐SPR biosensor demonstrates high sensitivity and is time‐saving in SARS‐CoV‐2 virus detection. This study suggests that incorporation of a high specific recognizer in SPR biosensor is an alternative strategy that could be applied in developing other emerging or re‐emerging pathogenic detection platforms.