Background: Using evidence-based practice (EBP) improves the implementation of safe, high-quality healthcare for patients, reduces avoidable costs, and plays a crucial role in bridging knowledge–action gaps and reducing health inequities. EBP combines the best available evidence in the relevant literature with patient preferences and values and healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) expertise. Methods: Systematic searches of ten bibliographic databases, unpublished works, and the Grey Literature Report sought studies published up to 30 September 2022. Results: The 15 studies retained involved 2712 nurses. Three types of effective educational interventions were identified: (1) multifaceted educational strategies incorporating mentoring and tutoring; (2) single educational strategies, often delivered online; and (3) multifaceted educational strategies using the five steps of EBP. Eleven primary outcomes (EBP beliefs, EBP self-efficacy, perceived EBP implementation, EBP competencies, EBP knowledge, EBP skills, EBP attitudes, EBP behaviors, EBP desire, EBP practice, and perceptions of organizational culture and readiness) were assessed using 13 qualitative and quantitative instruments. Conclusions: Ensuring the successful implementation of EBP requires effective educational strategies. Computer-based learning seems the most cost-effective and efficient strategy, when considering caregivers’ characteristics, the clinical field, and educational interventions across the pre-, peri-, and post-implementation processes.

Background: Little documentation exists on relationships between long-term residential care facilities (LTRCFs), staff working conditions and residents’ quality of care (QoC). Supporting evidence is weak because most studies examining this employ cross-sectional designs. Methods: Systematic searches of twelve bibliographic databases sought experimental and longitudinal studies, published up to May 2021, focusing on LTRCF nursing staff’s working conditions and the QoC they provided to older adults. Results: Of the 3577 articles identified, 159 were read entirely, and 11 were retained for inclusion. Higher nursing staff hours worked per resident per day (HPRD) were associated with significant reductions in pressure sores and urinary tract infections. Overall staff qualification levels and numbers of RNs had significant positive influences on QoC. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this systematic review is the first to combine cohort studies with a quasi-experimental study to explore associations between LTRCF nursing staff’s working conditions and older adult residents’ QoC. Human factors (including HPRD, staff turnover, skill mix, staff ratios) and the specific working contribution of RNs had overwhelmingly significant influences on QoC. It seems essential that LTRCF supervisory and decision-making bodies should promote optimal working conditions for nursing staff because these have such a direct impact on residents’ QoC.

Background: Numerous living labs have established a new approach for studying the health, independent living, and well-being of older adults with dementia. Living labs interact with a broad set of stakeholders, including students, academic institutions, private companies, health care organizations, and patient representative bodies and even with other living labs. Hence, it is crucial to identify the types of cocreations that should be attempted and how they can be facilitated through living labs. Objective: This study aims to scope publications that examine all types of living lab activities, exploring the needs and expectations of older adults with dementia and seeking solutions, whether they live in the community or long-term health care facilities (LTHFs). Methods: This scoping review was reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations for the extension of scoping reviews. We searched six bibliographic databases for publications up to March 2020, and a forward-backward citation chasing was performed. Additional searches were conducted using Google Scholar. The quality of the selected papers was assessed. Results: Of the 5609 articles identified, we read 58 (1.03%) articles and retained 12 (0.21%) articles for inclusion and final analysis. All 12 articles presented an innovative product, developed in 4 main living labs, to assist older adults with cognitive disorders or dementia living in the community or LTHFs. The objectives of these studies were to optimize health, quality of life, independent living, home care, and safety of older adults with cognitive disorders or dementia, as well as to support professional and family caregivers or reduce their burdens. The overall methodological quality of the studies ranged from poor to moderate. Conclusions: This scoping review identified several living labs playing a pivotal role in research aimed at older adults with dementia living in the community or LTHFs. However, it also revealed that living labs should conduct more better-quality interventional research to prove the effectiveness of their technological products or service solutions. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2147/SHTT.S233130

Aims and objectives: Examine beliefs about EBP and its level of implementation among nurses working in nursing homes in a bilingual canton of Switzerland and explore associations between these aspects and nurses’ sociodemographic and professional characteristics.Background: Although evidence‐based practice (EBP) is recognised as an effective strategy for improving the quality and safety of care, little is known about its use in nursing homes. Nurses’ beliefs about EBP and their implementation of it in Switzerland’s nursing homes have never been explored.Design: An observational cross‐sectional study.Methods: Beliefs about and implementation of EBP were evaluated using validated French‐ and German‐language versions of the EBP Beliefs Scale and the EBP Implementation Scale, developed by Melnyk and Fineout‐Overholt (Melnyk, Fineout‐Overholt, & Mays, 2008, Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 5, 208). The STROBE checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used in reporting this study.Results: The participation rate was 40.6% (N = 194). Most participants stated that they had some knowledge of EBP and held favourable beliefs about it. Nevertheless, 37.1% of participants found the concept complicated and 36.1% found it time‐consuming. Participants were more likely to implement stages in the EBP process linked to direct clinical practice rather than those which required scientific knowledge and skills.Conclusion: Most participants had favourable beliefs about EBP, but the level of implementation of EBP among nurses in their daily clinical practice was sub‐optimal.Relevance to clinical practice: A greater emphasis should be put on fostering the use of EBP among nurses working in nursing homes. This could be achieved via training and the development of individual, institutional and contextual strategies promoting the integration of EBP in clinical settings.

Background: As early as 1995, the Institute of Medicine suggested that nurses were inadequately prepared for and educated about climate change and its health consequences. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the most reliable, robust, and valid instruments for measuring nurses’ knowledge and awareness of climate change and climate-associated diseases. Methods: Included studies were appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool and the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. The psychometrics and clinimetrics of the instruments were evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and the COSMIN methodology for assessing content validity. Results: Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Ebesco, Cochrane Library Wiley, Web of Science Core Collection, Trip Database, JBI OVID SP, GreenFILE EBSCO, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and DART-EU were consulted. The 14 studies retained identified eight different instruments evaluating attitudes, perceptions, environmental awareness, environmental sensitivity, environmental attitudes, behaviours, motivation, concern, optimism, and experience. This review is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Conclusions: The New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEPS) and the Climate, Health, and Nursing Tool (CHANT) are the most reliable, robust, and valid instruments for measuring nurses’ knowledge and awareness of climate change and climate-associated diseases.

Background: People with dementia commonly display behavioral and psychological symptoms, which have multiple negative consequences. Artificial intelligence–based technologies (AITs) have the potential to support earlier detection of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). The recent surge of interest in this topic underscores the need to comprehensively examine the existing evidence. Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify and summarize the types and uses of AITs currently used for the early detection of BPSD among people diagnosed with the disease. We also examined which health care professionals were involved, nursing involvement and experience, the care settings in which these technologies are used, and the characteristics of the BPSD that were assessed. Methods: Our scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for scoping reviews. Searches were conducted in March 2025 in the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE ALL Ovid, Embase, APA PsycINFO Ovid, CINAHL EBSCO, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Library Wiley, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I. Additional searches were performed using citation tracking strategies and by consulting the Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library. Eligible studies included primary research involving people with dementia and examining the use of AITs for the detection of BPSD in real-world care settings. Results: After screening 3670 articles for eligibility, the review includes 12 studies. The studies retained were conducted between 2012 and 2025 in 5 countries and encompassed a range of care settings. The AITs used were predominantly based on classic machine learning approaches and used information from environmental sensors, wearable devices, and data recording systems. These studies primarily assessed behavioral and physiological parameters and focused specifically on symptoms, such as agitation and aggression. None of the retained studies explored nurses’ roles or their specific skills in using these technologies. Conclusions: The use of AITs for managing BPSD represents an emerging field of research offering novel opportunities to enhance their detection in various health care contexts. We recommended that nurses be actively engaged in developing and assessing these technologies. Future research should prioritize investigations into how effective AITs are across diverse populations, whether they can have a long-term impact on managing BPSD, and whether they can improve the quality of life of patients and caregivers.