Susan Jones

Dr. Susan Jones

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 1997 in Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCa Orengo
Ca Orengo
AMAd Michie
Ad Michie
SJSusan Jones
Susan Jones
DJDt Jones
Dt Jones
MSMb Swindells
Mb Swindells
JTJm Thornton
Jm Thornton

1 January 2004 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSusan Jones
Susan Jones
The basic helix-loop-helix proteins are dimeric transcription factors that are found in almost all eukaryotes. In animals, they are important regulators of embryonic development, particularly in neurogenesis, myogenesis, heart development and hematopoiesis.

15 February 2001 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SJSusan Jones
Susan Jones
DDD T Daley
D T Daley
NLN M Luscombe
N M Luscombe
HBH M Berman
H M Berman
JTJ M Thornton
J M Thornton
A detailed computational analysis of 32 protein-RNA complexes is presented. A number of physical and chemical properties of the intermolecular interfaces are calculated and compared with those observed in protein-double-stranded DNA and protein-single-stranded DNA complexes. The interface properties of the protein-RNA complexes reveal the diverse nature of the binding sites. van der Waals contacts played a more prevalent role than hydrogen bond contacts, and preferential binding to guanine and uracil was observed. The positively charged residue, arginine, and the single aromatic residues, phenylalanine and tyrosine, all played key roles in the RNA binding sites. A comparison between protein-RNA and protein-DNA complexes showed that whilst base and backbone contacts (both hydrogen bonding and van der Waals) were observed with equal frequency in the protein-RNA complexes, backbone contacts were more dominant in the protein-DNA complexes. Although similar modes of secondary structure interactions have been observed in RNA and DNA binding proteins, the current analysis emphasises the differences that exist between the two types of nucleic acid binding protein at the atomic contact level.

1 July 1998 in Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrew MartinAndrew Martin
Andrew Martin
COChristine A Orengo
Christine A Orengo
EHE Gail Hutchinson
E Gail Hutchinson
SJSusan Jones
Susan Jones
MKMaria Karmirantzou
Maria Karmirantzou
JTJanet M Thornton
Janet M Thornton

13 February 2007 in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JEJonathan J. Ellis
Jonathan J. Ellis
MBMark Broom
Mark Broom
SJSusan Jones
Susan Jones

15 December 2003 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSusan Jones
Susan Jones
A method to detect DNA-binding sites on the surface of a protein structure is important for functional annotation. This work describes the analysis of residue patches on the surface of DNA-binding proteins and the development of a method of predicting DNA-binding sites using a single feature of these surface patches. Surface patches and the DNA-binding sites were initially analysed for accessibility, electrostatic potential, residue propensity, hydrophobicity and residue conservation. From this, it was observed that the DNA-binding sites were, in general, amongst the top 10% of patches with the largest positive electrostatic scores. This knowledge led to the development of a prediction method in which patches of surface residues were selected such that they excluded residues with negative electrostatic scores. This method was used to make predictions for a data set of 56 non-homologous DNA-binding proteins. Correct predictions made for 68% of the data set.