Peng Yan

Prof. Dr. Peng Yan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 April 2018 in KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LXLiang-Tao Xie
Liang-Tao Xie
PYPeng Yan
Peng Yan
WLWenbo Lu
Wenbo Lu
MCMing Chen
Ming Chen
GWGao-Hui Wang
Gao-Hui Wang
The strain energy adjustment processes and rock failure modes corresponding to different excavation methods, such as Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) or blasting, are quite different during construction of deep tunnel. Based on the diversion tunnel excavation of Jin-Ping II hydropower station (JPII) in southwestern China, the distribution characteristics of damage zones and adjustment process of rock strain energy under different excavation methods are analyzed and discussed, and the occurrences of rock bursts in the diversion tunnels are also monitored and analyzed. Research reveals that, the adjustment process of rock strain energy and the distribution of damage zones are obviously different under different excavation methods, and the depth and distribution of damage zone are positively correlated with the accumulation depth of rock strain energy. For blasting excavation, due to the combined effects of blast loading and in situ stress transient unloading, the surrounding rock is damaged seriously. The accumulation depth of rock strain energy is significantly larger than that by TBM excavation, while the accumulation peak of rock strain energy is smaller. For TBM excavation, the strain energy releases smoothly and slowly, and much more strain energy is accumulated in the vicinity of excavation face. Under similar geological conditions in the JPII, the rock bursts of intensive and mediate grades can be more frequently observed after blasting for the impact of severe excavation disturbance, and the strain energy transient adjustment may be the main disturbance contributor. While during TBM excavation, due to the smooth adjustment process of rock strain energy, the disturbance to surrounding rock is limited, and the accumulation peak of rock strain energy is higher and closer to the excavation face, which may result in more spalling events or minor rock bursts.

11 July 2018 in Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LXLiangtao Xie
Liangtao Xie
PYPeng Yan
Peng Yan
WLWenbo Lu
Wenbo Lu
MCMing Chen
Ming Chen
GWGaohui Wang
Gaohui Wang

11 April 2017 in Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PYPeng Yan
Peng Yan
WLWenbo Lu
Wenbo Lu
JZJing Zhang
Jing Zhang
YZYujun Zou
Yujun Zou
MCMing Chen
Ming Chen

1 October 2021 in KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAng Lu
Ang Lu
PYPeng Yan
Peng Yan
WLWenbo Lu
Wenbo Lu
MCMing Chen
Ming Chen
GWGaohui Wang
Gaohui Wang
XLXiao Liu
Xiao Liu
Rockburst mechanism has been a hot topic in the stability analysis of underground carven excavation, and the accurate description of energy evolution process is very critical to rockburst prediction. To study the evolution process of rockburst, such as V-shaped rockburst pit, theoretical formula derivation and numerical simulation are adopted to research the dynamic response characteristics during the formation process of rockburst pits quantitatively. The results show that rockburst intensity distribution varies with failure depth. It can be divided into three zone: slow-increase, rapid-increase and slow-decrease. For a circular tunnel with radius R, the strain energy release rate and vibration response of surrounding rock increases gradually within (0–0.06) R; reaches the peak value around (0.06–0.1) R and drops to a balance beyond 0.1R. Due to the same law of them, the rockburst risk can be conveniently predicted by monitoring vibration of surrounding rock with a certain depth. This work is beneficial to provide a good reference for rockburst prediction.

28 May 2016 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PYPeng Yan
Peng Yan
YZYujun Zou
Yujun Zou
JZJunru Zhou
Junru Zhou
WLWenbo Lu
Wenbo Lu
YZYuzhu Zhang
Yuzhu Zhang
LLLiang Liu
Liang Liu

3 July 2021 in Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLsheng luo
sheng luo
PYPeng Yan
Peng Yan
WLWenbo Lu
Wenbo Lu
MCMing Chen
Ming Chen
Gaohui WangGaohui Wang
Gaohui Wang
XLXiao Liu
Xiao Liu