Genetic deficiency of ectodysplasin A (EDA) causes X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED), in which the development of sweat glands is irreversibly impaired, an condition that can lead to life-threatening hyperthermia. We observed normal development of mouse fetuses with Eda mutations after they had been exposed in utero to a recombinant protein that includes the receptor-binding domain of EDA. We administered this protein intraamniotically to two affected human twins at gestational weeks 26 and 31 and to a single affected human fetus at gestational week 26; the infants, born in week 33 (twins) and week 39 (singleton), were able to sweat normally, and XLHED-related illness had not developed by 14 to 22 months of age. (Funded by Edimer Pharmaceuticals and others.)

To keep pace with the rapid advancements in molecular genetics and rare diseases research, we have updated the list of ectodermal dysplasias based on the latest classification approach that was adopted in 2017 by an international panel of experts. For this purpose, we searched the databases PubMed and OMIM for the term “ectodermal dysplasia”, referring mainly to changes in the last 5 years. We also tried to obtain information about those diseases on which the last scientific report appeared more than 15 years ago by contacting the authors of the most recent publication. A group of experts, composed of researchers who attended the 8th International Conference on Ectodermal Dysplasias and additional members of the previous classification panel, reviewed the proposed amendments and agreed on a final table listing all 49 currently known ectodermal dysplasias for which the molecular genetic basis has been clarified, including 15 new entities. A newly reported ectodermal dysplasia, linked to the gene LRP6, is described here in more detail. These ectodermal dysplasias, in the strict sense, should be distinguished from syndromes with features of ectodermal dysplasia that are related to genes extraneous to the currently known pathways involved in ectodermal development. The latter group consists of 34 syndromes which had been placed on the previous list of ectodermal dysplasias, but most if not all of them could actually be classified elsewhere. This update should streamline the classification of ectodermal dysplasias, provide guidance to the correct diagnosis of rare disease entities, and facilitate the identification of individuals who could benefit from novel treatment options.

Background: X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED), the most common type of ectodermal dysplasia, is caused by EDA gene mutations. Reduced sweating contributes substantially to XLHED associated morbidity and mortality. To characterise the genotype–phenotype relationship, sweat gland function was assessed non-invasively in XLHED patients and healthy controls. Subjects and methods: In 36 genotyped XLHED patients and 29 control subjects aged 0–57 years, pilocarpine-induced sweat volume, palmar sweat pore density, and palmar skin conductance before and after stimulation were determined. Results: Among 31 XLHED males, 14 had neither detectable sweat pores nor inducible sweating, 10 showed a few sweat pores but absent sweating, and 7 produced reduced sweat volumes (1–11 μl) as compared with controls (38–93 μl). Two of the low sweating XLHED subjects had normal sweat pore counts. In all 5 heterozygous females, some sweat was detected, but generally less than in female controls. Basal and stimulated skin conductance readings were reduced in 23 of 24 non-sweating, but only in 3 of 12 low-sweating XLHED subjects. There was no correlation between sweat production and number of missing teeth. Conclusions: In contrast to prior reports on non-genotyped hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia populations, this study confirmed a consistent, quantifiable defect of sweat gland function in male XLHED subjects as a disease biomarker. Among 26 different EDA genotypes, specific mutations were shown to be consistently associated with anhidrosis, implying that systematic mapping of EDA mutations together with the analysis of objective clinical data may help to distinguish functionally crucial mutations from those allowing residual activity of the gene product.