Background: Stenting of aortic coarctation (CoA) in newborns with a very low bodyweight remains rare and challenging. In this study we aim to highlight on two points: first the feasibility of CoA stenting in such babies and second the importance of using echocardiogram for guiding the intervention without the need for contrast agent.Methods: Between 2020 and 2022 three preterm babies with very low (VLWB) and extremely low weight (ELWB) underwent CoA-stenting in our center. The weight of the patients at time of intervention was 1,350, 1,200, and 600 g, respectively. The femoral artery was chosen in all patients as vascular access. Transthoracic echocardiography, sonography of the femoral arteries and head ultrasound were applied for follow up.Results: All three interventions were successfully done, with no complications. Coronary stents were implanted. In one Patient (1,350 g) the stent was inserted without sheath. In two patients with renal failure, the stenting was performed under echocardiography-guidance without contrast agent. The follow up showed a preserved function of the left ventricle in all patients. No relevant gradient was reported and no stent re-intervention was required. Sonographic follow up showed a patent femoral artery in all patients. Two patients were operated 73 and 110 days after stenting, and the stents were successfully removed. In the third patient the intervention was performed 130 days ago and he is waiting for the operation.Conclusion: CoA-stenting in VLWB and ELWB is feasible and can bridge them to the next surgery without complications. Echocardiography-guided CoA-stenting in VLWB is a considerate option especially in patients with renal failure. Accessing the femoral artery by experienced doctors, using local anesthesia before the puncture and before removing the sheath might help to protect the vessel from stenosis or occlusion.

Background: To evaluate whether a quantitative curvature threshold can contribute to risk stratification of ductal stenting in patients with a duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC). Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed. The ductal curvature index (DCI) was calculated in 71 patients with DDPC. The ducts were divided into four classes based on quartile thresholds of DCI: class I (≤0.12), class II (0.13–0.33), class III (0.34–0.44), and class IV (≥0.45). The primary outcome of this study was defined as free from all of the following: (I) intervention related death, (II) need of unplanned surgery (III) need of unplanned pulmonary valve (PV) perforation with stent in right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and (IV) intervention related permanent complications. Results: Eighty percent of patients in class IV (DCI ≥0.45) failed to achieve the primary outcome; odds ratio (OR) 9 and 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7–21.4 compared to 26.6% in all classes with DCI <0.45. 66.7% of these patients needed unplanned surgery or PVP with RVOT stent; OR 12.4 (95% CI: 4–39). 80% of major complications were observed in class IV (P<0.01). Need of pulmonary arterioplasty was in class IV 53.3%; OR 3.3 (95% CI: 1.5–7.1). Conclusions: DCI can be useful to guide the clinical decision-making in patients with torqued ducts. Patients with a DCI ≥0.45 belong to a high-risk group, in which ductal stenting is associated with an elevated risk for early surgery or unplanned re-intervention.

Background: Children with congenital heart disease require repeated catheterization. Anesthetic management influences the procedure and may influence outcome; however, data and recommendations are lacking for infants. We studied the influence of sedation versus general anesthesia (GA) on adverse events during catheterization for children <2 years old. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective study of all catheterization procedures (2008–2013). High-severity adverse event (HSAE) rates were compared using propensity-score-adjusted models, including pre- and intra-procedural variables. Results: 803 cases (619 patients) (368 (46%) GA, 435 (54%) sedation) with a mean age of 6.9 ± 6.1 months were studied. The conversion rate (GA after sedation) was 18 (4%). Hospital stay was 4.9 ± 4.0 and 4.1 ± 2.5 (p = 0.01) after GA or sedation, respectively. HSAE occurred in 75 (20%) versus 40 (9%) (p < 0.01) in GA versus sedation procedures, respectively. Risk factors (multivariable analysis) were older patients (p = 0.05), smaller weights (p < 0.01), palliated status (OR 3.2 [1.2–8.9], p = 0.02), two-ventricle physiology (OR 7.3 [2.7–20.2], p < 0.01), cyanosis (OR 4.6 [2.2–9.8], p < 0.01), pulmonary hypertension (OR 5.6 [2.0–15.5], p < 0.01), interventional catheterization (OR 1.8 [1.1–3.2], p = 0.02) and procedure-type risk category 4 (OR 28.9 [1.8–455.1], p = 0.02). Sedation did not increase the events rate and decreased the requirement for hemodynamic support (OR 5.2 [2.2–12.0], p < 0.01). Conclusion: Sedation versus GA for cardiac catheterization in children <2 years old is safe and effective with regard to HSAE. Sedation also decreases the requirement for hemodynamic support. Paradoxical effects (older age and two-ventricle physiology) on risk have been found for this specific age cluster.

Background: As no data were available on the comparison of outcomes between modified Blalock-Taussig shunts (MBTs) vs. duct-stenting (DS) in patients with pulmonary atresia (PA) and an increased ductal tortuosity and in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact septum (PA-IVS) with right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation (RVDCC), we aimed to perform a single-center retrospective evaluation.Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, 127 patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC) underwent either MBTs (without additional repairs) (n = 56) or DS (n = 71). The primary endpoint was defined as arriving at the next planned surgery (Glenn or biventricular repair) avoiding one of the following: (1) unplanned surgery or unplanned perforation of the pulmonary valve (PVP) with a stent, (2) procedure-related permanent complications, and (3) death. Two subgroups were considered: (1) patients who had a ductal curvature index (DCI) >0.45 (n = 32) and (2) patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC (n = 13). Ductal curvature index (DCI) was measured in all the patients to assess the tortuosity of the ducts. Patients with DCI >0.45 were considered as being in a high-risk group for the duct-stenting; a previous study showed that the patients with a DCI < 0.45 had a better outcome when compared with those with a DCI> 0.45.Results: The primary outcome was achieved equally in the two groups (77.5% in DS, 75% in MBTs). Hospital deaths, need for ECMO, and the occurrence of major complications was more frequent in the group with MBTs with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 5, 0.8, and 4, respectively, and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.1–22.6, 0.7–0.9, and 1.6–10.3, respectively, and a P-value < 0.05. For the two subgroups, the primary outcome was achieved in 64% of patients with a DCI >0.45 who received MBTs compared to 20% in those with DS (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2–10, P 0.005). While 74.1% of the patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC after DS had achieved the primary outcome, all patients with MBTs had an impaired outcome (OR 3.5, 95%CI 1–11.2, P 0.004).Conclusion: MBTs showed a better outcome in patients with tortuous ducts compared to DS. DS seems to be superior in patients with DDPC with DCI <0.45 and patients with PA-IVS with RVDCC.

We report a case of critical aortic coarctation in an extremely low birth weight preterm infant weighing 600 g that was successfully treated with interventional stent implantation. The intervention was guided by echocardiography without using contrast agent due to associated renal failure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Objective: To our knowledge, no prior study has focused on the outcome of PDA occlusion using an Amplatzer™ Vascular Plug 4 (AP4) in ill preterm infants. This study aims to highlight the pros and cons of AP4 in this cohort.Methods: Between 2020 and 2022, 26 ill preterm infants underwent PDA closure in our centre. The median age, weight, and gestational age were 60 days (11–180 days), 1,900g (900–3,400 g), and 25 weeks (22–33 weeks), respectively. The indication of the intervention was hemodynamically significant PDA. A medical trial with non-steroid medication failed to close the ducts in all patients. Follow-up using echocardiography was done 24, 48, and 72 h after the intervention.Results: Of 26 ducts, 21 were successfully closed with AP4. Five ducts shorter than 7 mm were unsuitable for AP4 and were closed with the Amplatzer Piccolo device. The median radiation time was 4 min (3–9 min). No early plug-related complications or deaths were documented. Plug-related jailing of the left pulmonary artery as a late complication was 9.5%, and LPA reintervention was required. All ducts were closed after 48 h.Conclusion: Implantation of the AP4 using a 4 F 0.38 guide wire-compatible catheter without inserting a long sheath makes the closure of tubular ducts with this device feasible and uncomplicated with a short intervention time. However, the limited sizes with fixed lengths of the AP4 make it unsuitable for ducts wider than 4.5 mm and shorter than the chosen device length, which can increase the risk of significant left pulmonary stenosis. A wide range of plug diameters and lengths is required to accommodate the large and short ducts.