Tetsuo Asakura

Prof. Tetsuo Asakura

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2001 in Journal of Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATetsuo Asakura
Tetsuo Asakura
JAJun Ashida
Jun Ashida
TYTsutomu Yamane
Tsutomu Yamane
TKTsunenori Kameda
Tsunenori Kameda
Yasumoto NakazawaYasumoto Nakazawa
Yasumoto Nakazawa
KKKohei Komatsu
Kohei Komatsu

1 July 2002 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATetsuo Asakura
Tetsuo Asakura
JYJuming Yao
Juming Yao
TYTsutomu Yamane
Tsutomu Yamane
KUKosuke Umemura
Kosuke Umemura
AUAnne S Ulrich
Anne S Ulrich

29 November 2006 in Biomacromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATetsuo Asakura
Tetsuo Asakura
KUKosuke Umemura
Kosuke Umemura
Yasumoto NakazawaYasumoto Nakazawa
Yasumoto Nakazawa
HHHaruko Hirose
Haruko Hirose
JHJames Higham
James Higham
DKDavid Knight
David Knight

15 April 2003 in Biopolymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CZChenhua Zhao
Chenhua Zhao
JYJuming Yao
Juming Yao
HMHiromi Masuda
Hiromi Masuda
RKRaghuvansh Kishore
Raghuvansh Kishore
TATetsuo Asakura
Tetsuo Asakura

17 June 2021 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TATetsuo Asakura
Tetsuo Asakura
Recently, considerable attention has been paid to Bombyx mori silk fibroin by a range of scientists from polymer chemists to biomaterial researchers because it has excellent physical properties, such as strength, toughness, and biocompatibility. These appealing physical properties originate from the silk fibroin structure, and therefore, structural determinations of silk fibroin before (silk I) and after (silk II) spinning are a key to make wider applications of silk. There are discrepancies about the silk I structural model, i.e., one is type II β-turn structure determined using many solid-state and solution NMR spectroscopies together with selectively stable isotope-labeled model peptides, but another is α-helix or partially α-helix structure speculated using IR and Raman methods. In this review, firstly, the process that led to type II β-turn structure by the authors was introduced in detail. Then the problems in speculating silk I structure by IR and Raman methods were pointed out together with the problem in the assignment of the amide I band in the spectra. It has been emphasized that the conformational analyses of proteins and peptides from IR and Raman studies are not straightforward and should be very careful when the proteins contain β-turn structure using many experimental data by Vass et al. In conclusion, the author emphasized here that silk I structure should be type II β-turn, not α-helix.

1 November 2002 in Protein Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TATetsuo Asakura
Tetsuo Asakura
JYJuming Yao
Juming Yao