Sally Wasef

Dr. Sally Wasef

1. Ancient DNA Facility, Australian Research Center for Human Evolution (ARCHE), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2018 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHugh McColl
Hugh McColl
FRFernando Racimo
Fernando Racimo
LVLasse Vinner
Lasse Vinner
FDFabrice Demeter
Fabrice Demeter
TGTakashi Gakuhari
Takashi Gakuhari
EWEske Willerslev
Eske Willerslev
Ancient migrations in Southeast Asia: The past movements and peopling of Southeast Asia have been poorly represented in ancient DNA studies (see the Perspective by Bellwood). Lipson et al. generated sequences from people inhabiting Southeast Asia from about 1700 to 4100 years ago. Screening of more than a hundred individuals from five sites yielded ancient DNA from 18 individuals. Comparisons with present-day populations suggest two waves of mixing between resident populations. The first mix was between local hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers associated with the Neolithic spreading from South China. A second event resulted in an additional pulse of genetic material from China to Southeast Asia associated with a Bronze Age migration. McColl et al. sequenced 26 ancient genomes from Southeast Asia and Japan spanning from the late Neolithic to the Iron Age. They found that present-day populations are the result of mixing among four ancient populations, including multiple waves of genetic material from more northern East Asian populations. Science , this issue p. 92 , p. 88 ; see also p. 31

17 February 2010 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZHZahi Hawass
Zahi Hawass
YGYehia Z. Gad
Yehia Z. Gad
SISomaia Ismail
Somaia Ismail
RKRabab Khairat
Rabab Khairat
DFDina Fathalla
Dina Fathalla
CPCarsten M. Pusch
Carsten M. Pusch
Research from JAMA — Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun's Family

7 December 2018 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJoanne L. Wright
Joanne L. Wright
Sally WasefSally Wasef
Sally Wasef
THTim H. Heupink
Tim H. Heupink
MWMichael C. Westaway
Michael C. Westaway
SRSimon Rasmussen
Simon Rasmussen
DLDavid M. Lambert
David M. Lambert
Ancient DNA facilitates the return of remains to Indigenous tribal groups, resolving a long-standing concern.

14 December 2012 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZHZahi Hawass
Zahi Hawass
SISomaia Ismail
Somaia Ismail
ASAshraf Selim
Ashraf Selim
SSSahar N Saleem
Sahar N Saleem
DFDina Fathalla
Dina Fathalla
AZAlbert R Zink
Albert R Zink
Objective To investigate the true character of the harem conspiracy described in the Judicial Papyrus of Turin and determine whether Ramesses III was indeed killed. Design Anthropological, forensic, radiological, and genetic study of the mummies of Ramesses III and unknown man E, found together and taken from the 20th dynasty of ancient Egypt (circa 1190-1070 BC). Results Computed tomography scans revealed a deep cut in Ramesses III’s throat, probably made by a sharp knife. During the mummification process, a Horus eye amulet was inserted in the wound for healing purposes, and the neck was covered by a collar of thick linen layers. Forensic examination of unknown man E showed compressed skin folds around his neck and a thoracic inflation. Unknown man E also had an unusual mummification procedure. According to genetic analyses, both mummies had identical haplotypes of the Y chromosome and a common male lineage. Conclusions This study suggests that Ramesses III was murdered during the harem conspiracy by the cutting of his throat. Unknown man E is a possible candidate as Ramesses III’s son Pentawere.

1 December 2015 in Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sally WasefSally Wasef
Sally Wasef
RWR. Wood
R. Wood
SMS. El Merghani
S. El Merghani
SIS. Ikram
S. Ikram
CCC. Curtis
C. Curtis
DLD.M. Lambert
D.M. Lambert

8 August 2019 in World Archaeology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMark Collard
Mark Collard
Sally WasefSally Wasef
Sally Wasef
SAShaun Adams
Shaun Adams
KWKirsty Wright
Kirsty Wright
RMR. John Mitchell
R. John Mitchell
MWMichael C. Westaway
Michael C. Westaway
In this paper we outline a worked example of the combined use of genetic data and archaeological evidence. The project focuses on Queensland’s Cape York Peninsula and has two goals. One is to shed new light on the population history of the region. The other is to develop a methodology to facilitate repatriation of the remains of Aboriginal Australians. After providing some background to the project and outlining its main activities, we summarize our key findings to date. Subsequently, we discuss what the project has taught us about the prehistory of Cape York, the potential for DNA research and isotope chemistry to assist research institutions and Aboriginal communities with the repatriation of unaffiliated remains, and the process of conducting combined genetic and archaeological research.