Vincent Denoël

Prof. Dr. Vincent Denoël

Department of Architecture, Geology, Environment and Constructions, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2009 in Journal of Sound and Vibration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGChristophe Germay
Christophe Germay
Vincent DenoëlVincent Denoël
Vincent Denoël
EDEmmanuel Detournay
Emmanuel Detournay

21 January 2015 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMohamed Boutaayamou
Mohamed Boutaayamou
CSCédric Schwartz
Cédric Schwartz
JSJulien Stamatakis
Julien Stamatakis
Vincent DenoëlVincent Denoël
Vincent Denoël
DMDidier Maquet
Didier Maquet
OBOlivier Brüls
Olivier Brüls
An original signal processing algorithm is presented to automatically extract, on a stride-by-stride basis, four consecutive fundamental events of walking, heel strike (HS), toe strike (TS), heel-off (HO), and toe-off (TO), from wireless accelerometers applied to the right and left foot. First, the signals recorded from heel and toe three-axis accelerometers are segmented providing heel and toe flat phases. Then, the four gait events are defined from these flat phases. The accelerometer-based event identification was validated in seven healthy volunteers and a total of 247 trials against reference data provided by a force plate, a kinematic 3D analysis system, and video camera. HS, TS, HO, and TO were detected with a temporal accuracy ± precision of 1.3 ms ± 7.2 ms, -4.2 ms ± 10.9 ms, -3.7 ms ± 14.5 ms, and -1.8 ms ± 11.8 ms, respectively, with the associated 95% confidence intervals ranging from -6.3 ms to 2.2 ms. It is concluded that the developed accelerometer-based method can accurately and precisely detect HS, TS, HO, and TO, and could thus be used for the ambulatory monitoring of gait features computed from these events when measured concurrently in both feet.

1 December 2017 in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCédric Schwartz
Cédric Schwartz
FTFrançois Tubez
François Tubez
FWFrançois Wang
François Wang
JCJean-Louis Croisier
Jean-Louis Croisier
OBOlivier Brüls
Olivier Brüls
BFBénédicte Forthomme
Bénédicte Forthomme

1 February 2011 in International Journal of Solids and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vincent DenoëlVincent Denoël
Vincent Denoël
EDEmmanuel Detournay
Emmanuel Detournay

1 December 2019 in Journal of Bridge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JFJonas Feron
Jonas Feron
LBLindy Boucher
Lindy Boucher
Vincent DenoëlVincent Denoël
Vincent Denoël
PLPierre Latteur
Pierre Latteur
The architectural potential of tensegrity structures is proven. Yet, paradoxically, very few real construction projects have been built around the world. The main reasons are complex construction processes, lack of design and optimization guidelines, and excessive self-weight due to the prestress needed to guarantee stiffness and dynamic behavior. Hence, optimizing the stiffness and self-weight is a key aspect when designing a tensegrity footbridge. Previous research has demonstrated the validity of a design and optimization methodology, based on morphological indicators, that identifies geometry with a maximum stiffness and/or a minimum self-weight for a family of structures. In this paper, that methodology is applied to footbridges composed of tensegrity modules comprising simplex, quadruplex, pentaplex, and hexaplex types. A comparison of the stiffest and lightest structures is provided, a practical case study is developed, and the relevance and feasibility of such tensegrity footbridges are discussed. As a result, the study provides advice on optimum footbridge topologies with the following characteristics: excellent stiffness and dynamic behavior; efficient structures composed of simplex modules; and self-weight that is still rather high but similar to that of bended structures, although with potential to be reduced thanks to optimization of the prestress scenario.

1 June 2014 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSCédric Schwartz
Cédric Schwartz
JCJean-Louis Croisier
Jean-Louis Croisier
ERElise Rigaux
Elise Rigaux
Vincent DenoëlVincent Denoël
Vincent Denoël
OBOlivier Brüls
Olivier Brüls
BFBénédicte Forthomme
Bénédicte Forthomme