Joy Waite-Cusic

Dr. Joy Waite-Cusic

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2022 in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRebecca Bland
Rebecca Bland
SBStephanie R. B. Brown
Stephanie R. B. Brown
JWJoy Waite-Cusic
Joy Waite-Cusic
JKJovana Kovacevic
Jovana Kovacevic
The development of antibiotic resistance is a serious public health crisis, reducing our ability to effectively combat infectious bacterial diseases. The parallel study of reduced susceptibility to sanitizers is growing, particularly for environmental foodborne pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes . As regulations demand a seek‐and‐destroy approach for L. monocytogenes , understanding sanitizer efficacy and its uses are critical for the food industry. Studies have reported the ability of L. monocytogenes to survive in sanitizer concentrations 10–1000 times lower than the manufacturer‐recommended concentration (MRC). Notably, data show that at MRC and when applied according to the label instructions, sanitizers remain largely effective. Studies also report that variables such as the presence of organic material, application time/temperature, and bacterial attachment to surfaces can impact sanitizer effectiveness. Due to the lack of standardization in the methodology and definitions of sanitizer resistance, tolerance, and susceptibility, different messages are conveyed in different studies. In this review, we examine the diversity of definitions, terminology, and methodologies used in studies examining L. monocytogenes resistance and susceptibility to antimicrobials. Research available to date fails to demonstrate “resistance” of L. monocytogenes to recommended sanitizer treatments as prescribed by the label. As such, sanitizer tolerance would be a more accurate description of L. monocytogenes response to low sanitizer concentrations (i.e., sub‐MRC). Conservative use of word “resistance” will reduce confusion and allow for concise messaging as sanitizer research findings are communicated to industry and regulators.

1 April 2020 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSun Hee Moon
Sun Hee Moon
JWJoy Waite-Cusic
Joy Waite-Cusic
EHEn Huang
En Huang

1 January 2019 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDanton Batty
Danton Batty
JWJoy Waite-Cusic
Joy Waite-Cusic
LMLisbeth Meunier-Goddik
Lisbeth Meunier-Goddik
Bloomy rind cheeses, including Camembert and related varieties, can be produced using alternative processes that vary based on milk preacidification, cutting, curd handling, and ripening parameters. Modification of these parameters creates distinct cheeses such as lactic curd, stabilized curd, and hybrids of the two. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of 5 Camembert-type cheese recipes on the composition and characteristics during ripening. Five varieties of Camembert-type cheese were produced: (1) lactic curd, (2) sweet curd, (3) washed curd, (4) solubilized curd, and (5) stabilized curd. Cheeses were aged at 13°C for 10 d, during the mold growth phase, and 7°C from d 11 until 50. Key quality metrics including texture development, pH (center and surface), and color were monitored throughout shelf-life. Compositional evaluation (d 5; fat, protein, moisture, salt, and minerals) grouped cheeses into 3 categories: (1) lactic curd, (2) sweet and washed curd, and (3) solubilized and stabilized curd. The lactic curd and stabilized curd were consistently the most different varieties for composition and quality metrics. Moisture content of Camembert-type varieties ranged from 53.15 to 57.99%, Ca ranged from 0.23 to 0.45%, and P ranged from 0.21 to 0.40%. All varieties followed the expected pH evolution on the rind and in the paste with the pH of the rind reaching 7 by d 10, and paste pH reaching 7 between 35 and 50 d. The displacement of the paste (distance traveled upon cutting) for the lactic curd was the greatest among the 5 varieties, reaching an average of 27 ± 1.9 mm (mean ± standard error) after 50 d of ripening and 60 min of flow time. The stabilized curd on the other hand traveled the shortest distance, reaching an average of 4 ± 0.4 mm at the same time point. Browning, considered a defect in mold-ripened cheeses, was observed in all varieties, but was most substantial for lactic curd (lightness, L*, decreased from 87.19 to 68.58). Based on these quality metrics the shelf-life of these recipes was estimated with the lactic curd having the shortest, and the stabilized curd having the longest. Examining Camembert-type cheese quality metrics for these 5 varieties can assist cheesemakers during recipe formulation and selection of cheese-making practices to achieve optimum product quality.

1 July 2016 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GTGregory Turbes
Gregory Turbes
TLTyler D. Linscott
Tyler D. Linscott
ETElizabeth Tomasino
Elizabeth Tomasino
JWJoy Waite-Cusic
Joy Waite-Cusic
JLJuyun Lim
Juyun Lim
Lisbeth Meunier-GoddikLisbeth Meunier-Goddik
Lisbeth Meunier-Goddik
The concept of local food is rapidly gaining importance within the United States. The foundation of local food is terroir, which links a food to its production environment. The purpose of this study was to investigate evidence of terroir in milk sourcing and its influence on Cheddar cheese flavor. Specifically, the study was designed to assess if consumers could differentiate between Cheddar cheeses made with milk from different dairy farms. Milk from 5 locations, including single dairy farms and commingled sites, was collected from around the state of Oregon. Using raw and pasteurized counterparts of the milk, Cheddar cheese was made and aged. At 5 and 9mo into aging, Cheddar cheese consumers were asked to group the samples based on perceived similarity/dissimilarity of cheese flavor. Grouping data were subjected to multidimensional scaling and subsequent cluster analysis. Results at 5mo into aging revealed that cheeses made by milk originating from different farms (80km apart) within the same region were perceived as different, whereas cheeses made with milk from neighboring farms (5km apart) were grouped together, irrespective of heat treatment (i.e., raw vs. pasteurized). Cheeses made with commingled milk from different regions grouped together. At 9mo of aging, in contrast, a clear separation of perceived flavor was present between the pasteurized and raw cheese samples, whereas the effect of milk sourcing was less pronounced. These data suggest that the geographical location of the milk source has an effect on the flavor of Cheddar cheese, but that the practices of milk commingling and heat treatment likely reduce the effect of geographical location, particularly as cheese ages.

1 October 2019 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDanton Batty
Danton Batty
LMLisbeth Meunier-Goddik
Lisbeth Meunier-Goddik
JWJoy Waite-Cusic
Joy Waite-Cusic
Bloomy rind cheeses, including Brie, Camembert, and related varieties, are at high risk of contamination by environmental pathogens during manufacture and ripening. This risk is particularly high during ripening due to open-air exposure of the product. Currently, no kill step is applied after manufacture or post ripening to control food safety risks associated with Listeria monocytogenes contamination. Instead, cheesemakers must rely on sanitation and environmental monitoring to reduce this risk. High-pressure processing (HPP) is a nonthermal food-processing technology that can effectively reduce bacterial contaminants with minimal impact on the organoleptic properties of various foods. The objective of this study was to evaluate HPP as a potential intervention to maintain Camembert cheese quality and reduce risk associated with L. monocytogenes. Timing of HPP treatments (3, 11, and 45 d after manufacture) was based on the growth of L. monocytogenes during Camembert cheese ripening. High-pressure processing treatment of fully ripened cheeses (45 d) resulted in destruction of the surface mold, which caused browning and yellowing of the cheese rind. Applying HPP treatment earlier in the ripening process (11 d) resulted in a similar degradation of cheese appearance, which did not improve with continued ripening. Applying HPP treatment shortly after production (3 d; before the surface flora developed) delayed the development of the cheese rind and the textural ripening of the cheese. This early treatment time also resulted in free whey being expelled from the cheese, creating a firmer body. Applying HPP 11 d after manufacture resulted in >5 log reduction of L. monocytogenes at 450 and 550 MPa with holding times of 10 min. Although HPP was effective at reducing L. monocytogenes associated with bloomy rind cheeses, the quality deterioration would be unacceptable to consumers. Cheesemakers must continue to emphasize sanitation and environmental monitoring to reduce the risk of L. monocytogenes in bloomy rind cheeses.

1 July 2021 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBrandon Selover
Brandon Selover
JJJared Johnson
Jared Johnson
JWJoy Waite-Cusic
Joy Waite-Cusic
The detection of coliforms in young cheese is a potential indication of undesirable microbial growth within the processing environment. The aim of this study was to investigate sources and conditions that lead to the intermittent detection of coliforms (1-3 log cfu/g) in young Cheddar cheese at a single commercial facility. Analysis of historical production data, in combination with iterative investigative sampling events, was performed to determine coliform levels in milk, whey, curd, and surfaces at the beginning, middle, and end of the production day. After sanitation, conveyor belt pieces from the draining and matting conveyor (DMC) were collected and evaluated for bacterial survivors using culture-based methods and scanning electron microscopy. Production data analysis indicated that cheese produced later in the production day (≥16 h) was significantly more likely to test positive for coliforms than cheese made earlier in the production day (<12 h). Enumeration of coliforms in raw and heat-treated milk demonstrated that the subpasteurization thermal treatment (67-70°C, 26-28 s) was effective at reducing, but not eliminating, coliforms. Repeated sampling identified the DMC, particularly the drain belt and belt 1, as a critical area that supported coliform growth during the production day. Coliform levels in whey entering the weir maintained a level of <1 cfu/mL throughout production; however, coliform levels in whey below the drain belt increased from <1 cfu/mL at midday (8 h) to 5.04 log cfu/mL by the end of the production day (~18 h). Routine sanitation inside the DMC resulted in undetectable coliform levels on easily accessible surfaces. However, enrichment and scanning electron microscopy of belt sections revealed pockets of viable coliforms and other bacteria in cracks and defects in conveyor belts, indicating that sanitation did not eliminate all viable bacteria. Low levels of coliforms are present in heat-treated milk and survive sanitation in the DMC and could serve as the initial seed for high levels of coliforms at the end of the production day.