Tim Oxley

Dr. Tim Oxley

Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, City of London, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2004 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTim Oxley
Tim Oxley
BMB Mcintosh
B Mcintosh
NWN Winder
N Winder
MMM Mulligan
M Mulligan
GEG Engelen
G Engelen

1 November 2013 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TOTim Oxley
Tim Oxley
ADAnthony J. Dore
Anthony J. Dore
HAHelen ApSimon
Helen ApSimon
JHJane Hall
Jane Hall
Maciej KryzaMaciej Kryza
Maciej Kryza
Integrated assessment modelling has evolved to support policy development in relation to air pollutants and greenhouse gases by providing integrated simulation tools able to produce quick and realistic representations of emission scenarios and their environmental impacts without the need to re-run complex atmospheric dispersion models. The UK Integrated Assessment Model (UKIAM) has been developed to investigate strategies for reducing UK emissions by bringing together information on projected UK emissions of SO2, NOx, NH3, PM10 and PM2.5, atmospheric dispersion, criteria for protection of ecosystems, urban air quality and human health, and data on potential abatement measures to reduce emissions, which may subsequently be linked to associated analyses of costs and benefits. We describe the multi-scale model structure ranging from continental to roadside, UK emission sources, atmospheric dispersion of emissions, implementation of abatement measures, integration with European-scale modelling, and environmental impacts. The model generates outputs from a national perspective which are used to evaluate alternative strategies in relation to emissions, deposition patterns, air quality metrics and ecosystem critical load exceedance. We present a selection of scenarios in relation to the 2020 Business-As-Usual projections and identify potential further reductions beyond those currently being planned.

1 May 2012 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTim Oxley
Tim Oxley
AEAyman Elshkaki
Ayman Elshkaki
LKL. Kwiatkowski
L. Kwiatkowski
ACA. Castillo
A. Castillo
TST. Scarbrough
T. Scarbrough
HAH. ApSimon
H. ApSimon

11 November 2021 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDaniel Mehlig
Daniel Mehlig
HWHuw Woodward
Huw Woodward
TOTim Oxley
Tim Oxley
MHMichael Holland
Michael Holland
HAHelen ApSimon
Helen ApSimon
Currently, many cities in Europe are affected by concentrations of PM2.5 and NO2 above the WHO guidelines on the protection of human health. This is a global problem in which the growth of road transport constitutes a major factor. Looking to the future, electric vehicles (EVs) are considered to be the choice technology for reducing road transport greenhouse gas emissions, but their impact on air quality needs to be considered. Taking the UK as a case study, this paper begins by understanding the trajectory of a future scenario without the introduction of EVs, reflecting on the latest emission control improvements in internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). This is then compared to a 2050 scenario in which the introduction of EVs, based on the UK government’s Transport Decarbonisation Plan, is reviewed. This plan includes a ban on the sale of ICEV cars and LGVs, beginning in 2030, with the subsequent electrification of heavier vehicles. By 2030, population exposure to NOx was found to be significantly reduced in the ICEV scenario, with a marginal further reduction found for the EV scenario. The EV scenario further reduced NOx exposure by 2050, with most of the benefits being realized before 2040. For the ICEV and EV scenario, PM2.5 emissions were largely unchanged due to the primary contribution of non-exhaust emissions, suggesting that EVs are likely to yield relatively smaller changes in exposure to PM2.5 than for NOx.

1 December 2007 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTim Oxley
Tim Oxley
HAH.M. ApSimon
H.M. ApSimon

1 August 2021 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HAHelen ApSimon
Helen ApSimon
TOTim Oxley
Tim Oxley
HWHuw Woodward
Huw Woodward
DMDaniel Mehlig
Daniel Mehlig
ADAnthony Dore
Anthony Dore
MHMike Holland
Mike Holland
Source apportionment and the effect of reducing individual sources is important input for the development of strategies to address air pollution. The UK Integrated Assessment Model, UKIAM, has been developed for this purpose as a flexible framework, combining information from different atmospheric dispersion models to cover different pollutant contributions, and span the range from European to local scale. In this paper we describe the UKIAM as developed for SO2, NOx, NH3, PM2.5 and VOCs. We illustrate its versatility and application with assessment of current PM2.5 concentrations and exposure of the UK population, as a case-study that has been used as the starting point to investigate potential improvement towards attainment of the WHO guideline of 10 µg/m3.