The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics and identify the risk factors of short-term and 1-year mortality in a recent cohort of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). From January 2008, multidisciplinary teams have prospectively collected all consecutive cases of IE, diagnosed according to the Duke criteria, in 25 Spanish hospitals. Overall, 1804 patients were diagnosed. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 55–77), 68.0% were men, and 37.1% of the cases were nosocomial or health care-related IE. Gram-positive microorganisms accounted for 79.3% of the episodes, followed by Gram-negative (5.2%), fungi (2.4%), anaerobes (0.9%), polymicrobial infections (1.9%), and unknown etiology (9.1%). Heart surgery was performed in 44.2%, and in-hospital mortality was 28.8%. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were age, previous heart surgery, cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, Staphylococcus or Candida etiology, intracardiac complications, heart failure, and septic shock. The 1-year independent risk factors for mortality were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02), neoplasia (OR, 2.46), renal insufficiency (OR, 1.59), and heart failure (OR, 4.42). Surgery was an independent protective factor for 1-year mortality (OR, 0.44). IE remains a severe disease with a high rate of in-hospital (28.9%) and 1-year mortality (11.2%). Surgery was the only intervention that significantly reduced 1-year mortality.

Depending on the local prevalence of endocarditis, the NOVA prediction score (Number of positive blood cultures, Origin of the bacteremia, previous Valve disease, Auscultation of heart murmur) may safely obviate echocardiography in 14%–27% of patients with enterococcal bacteremia. Background. Frequency of enterococcal bloodstream infection (E-BSI) is increasing, and the number of episodes complicated by infective endocarditis (IE) varies. Performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in all patients with E-BSI is costly and time-consuming. Our objectives were to identify patients with E-BSI who are at very low risk of enterococcal IE (and therefore do not require TEE) and to compare the outcome of E-BSI in patients with/without IE. Methods. Between September 2003 and October 2012, we performed a prospective cohort study (all patients with E-BSI) and a case-control study (patients with/without enterococcal IE) in our center. Results. We detected 1515 patients with E-BSI and 65 with enterococcal IE (4.29% of all episodes of E-BSI, 16.7% of patients with E-BSI who underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and 35.5% of all patients with E-BSI who underwent TEE). We developed a bedside predictive score for enterococcal IE—Number of positive blood cultures, Origin of the bacteremia, previous Valve disease, Auscultation of heart murmur (NOVA) score—based on the following variables: Number of positive blood cultures (3/3 blood cultures or the majority if more than 3), 5 points; unknown Origin of bacteremia, 4 points; prior heart Valve disease, 2 points; Auscultation of a heart murmur, 1 point (receiver operating characteristic = 0.83). The best cutoff corresponded to a score ≥4 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 29%). A score <4 points suggested a very low risk for enterococcal IE and that TEE could be obviated. Conclusions. Enterococcal IE may be more frequent than generally thought. Depending on local prevalence of endocarditis, application of the NOVA score may safely obviate echocardiography in 14%–27% of patients with E-BSI.

It was our purpose to evaluate the clinical impact of systematic PET/CT for the diagnosis of infectious embolisms in patients with infectious endocarditis (IE) in comparison with a historic cohort of IE patients managed without this technique. Detection of extracardiac lesions is an essential component of the management and outcome of IE. Studies using PET/CT for the evaluation of patients with IE are scarce, lack a control group, evaluate a small number of patients, or consist of case reports. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study (47 patients with definite IE undergoing PET/CT) with matched controls (94 patients with definite IE not undergoing PET/CT) from January 2012 to July 2013 in a tertiary hospital. The results were compared with those of conventional diagnostic techniques and clinical follow-up. Results: PET/CT revealed at least 1 lesion in 35 patients (74.5%): 18 showed an embolic complication, 8 showed pathologic uptake on the valves or cardiac devices, 1 showed both, 5 had incidental noninfectious findings, and the findings for 3 were considered false-positive. The validity values for the efficacy of PET/CT in the diagnosis of septic lesions were as follows: sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 80%; positive predictive value, 90%; and negative predictive value, 100%. PET/CT was the only initially positive imaging technique in 15 true-positive cases (55.5%). The systematic use of PET/CT was associated with a 2-fold reduction in the number of relapses (9.6% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.25) and enabled significantly more infectious complications to be diagnosed (18% vs. 57.4%, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: PET/CT enables the extent of IE to be assessed using a single test. It is fast (<2 h) and comfortable for the patient, gathers whole-body data, and detects significantly more infectious complications.

Management of complicated bloodstream infections requires more aggressive treatment than uncomplicated bloodstream infections. We assessed the value of follow-up blood culture in bloodstream infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus , Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., and Candida spp. and studied the value of persistence of DNA in blood (using SeptiFast) for predicting complicated bloodstream infections. Patients with bloodstream infections caused by these microorganisms were enrolled prospectively. After the first positive blood culture, samples were obtained every third day to perform blood culture and SeptiFast analyses simultaneously. Patients were followed to detect complicated bloodstream infection. The study sample comprised 119 patients. One-third of the patients developed complicated bloodstream infections. The values of persistently positive tests to predict complicated bloodstream infections were as follows: SeptiFast positive samples (sensitivity, 56%; specificity, 79.5%; positive predictive value, 54%; negative predictive value, 80.5%; accuracy, 72.3%) and positive blood cultures (sensitivity, 30.5%; specificity, 92.8%; positive predictive value, 64%; negative predictive value, 75.5%; accuracy, 73.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a positive SeptiFast result between days 3 and 7 had an almost 8-fold-higher risk of developing a complicated bloodstream infection. In S. aureus , the combination of both techniques to exclude endovascular complications was significantly better than the use of blood culture alone. We obtained a score with variables selected by the multivariate model. With a cutoff of 7, the negative predictive value for complicated bloodstream infection was 96.6%. Patients with a positive SeptiFast result between days 3 and 7 after a positive blood culture have an almost 8-fold-higher risk of developing complicated bloodstream infections. A score combining clinical data with the SeptiFast result may improve the exclusion of complicated bloodstream infections.