Summary: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the association of thrombosis and recurrent pregnancy loss and/or pregnancy morbidity with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Increased complement activation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of APS in animal models. It was our objective to evaluate complement activation in patients with aPL or primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS). We measured complement activation products, fragments Bb and C3a–desArg by ELISA in 186 aPL/PAPS patients and 30 healthy controls. All patients with aPL had significantly increased levels of complement activation products. Fragment Bb levels (mean, 95% CI); (thrombotic APS 0.54 units/ml, 0.31–0.83, obstetric APS 0.60 units/ml,0.39–1.02, isolated aPL 0.48 units/ml, 0.29–0.85, overall 0.39 units/ml, 0.33–0.47) and C3a–desArg levels (mean, 95% CI): (thrombotic APS 261 ng/ml, 219–311, obstetric APS 308 ng/ml, 243–391, isolated aPL 258 ng/ml, 193–337, overall 225 ng/ml, 202–251) were significantly higher compared to controls (fragment Bb 0.06 units/ml, 0.03–0.11, C3a–desArg 69 ng/ml, 50–92). There were correlations between Fragment Bb and C3a–desArg levels in all patients with aPL. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed increased fragment Bb and C3a–desArg levels had strong associations with the presence of persistent lupus anticoagulant (area under ROC: Bb 0.89, and C3a–desArg 0.90), dual and triple aPL positivity (Bb 0.71–0.82, C3a–desArg 0.71–0.80) but not with high titre anti-cardiolipin antibodies (Bb 0.62, C3a–desArg 0.65), or anti β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (Bb 0.66, C3a–desArg 0.67). Complement activation is present in all patient groups within this large cohort of patients aPL. This suggests it may have a major role in the pathogenesis of APS and merits further study.

Endovenous stenting has emerged as the method of choice to treat iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. It is used in patients with established postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) after previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to reduce symptoms of chronic pain and swelling and to aid ulcer healing in severe cases. Venous stenting is used to alleviate symptoms of obstruction in patients presenting with acute DVT, with the aim of preventing development of PTS. There is a low risk of morbidity and mortality associated with the use of endovenous stenting, and although significant advances have been made, particularly improvements in stent design for use in the venous circulation, data are lacking on beneficial long-term outcomes. Unmet research needs include optimal patient selection, anticoagulant choice and duration, best practice for postoperative surveillance, and use of validated assessment tools to measure outcomes. In this article, I address the potential benefits, as well as the challenges, of endovenous stenting.

Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders. Of the MPNs, polycythaemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET) confer a high thrombotic risk which may be the presenting feature of the disease. Thrombotic complications consist of both arterial and venous events and the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation is associated with higher risk. Patients presenting with an unprovoked thrombus, particularly at an unusual site, e.g., splanchnic circulation, should be screened for the presence of this mutation. Historically, warfarin has been the only option for oral anticoagulation; however, there is now increasing evidence and practise to use direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in cancer. The seminal randomised control trials have demonstrated non-inferiority compared to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a preferable bleeding profile. DOACs are now the first line treatment for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease, as recommended by NICE, and therefore there is increasing familiarity with these agents. Furthermore, there are now targeted antidotes available. This paper reviews evidence for efficacy and safety of DOACs in MPN. Whilst no randomised control trials have been performed, several retrospective studies and reviews of registry data have reproducibly demonstrated that, alongside cytoreduction, DOACs represent an effective modality of anticoagulation for treatment of venous thromboembolism in MPN. Furthermore, dosing regimens provide the option for longer term secondary prophylaxis. Use of DOACs in arterial thrombosis is an area for future development and there is already some evidence for utility in peripheral vascular disease.