Background: Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (chest compression and rescue breathing) has been recommended for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) because of the asphyxial nature of the majority of pediatric cardiac arrest events. However, the clinical effectiveness of additional rescue breathing (conventional CPR) compared with compression-only CPR in children is uncertain. Methods: This nationwide population-based study of pediatric OHCA patients was based on data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. We included all pediatric patients who experienced OHCA in Japan from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological state 1 month after OHCA defined as a Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 to 2 (corresponding to a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1–3). Outcomes were compared with logistic regression with uni- and multivariable modeling in the overall cohort and for a propensity-matched subset of patients. Results: A total of 2157 patients were included; 417 received conventional CPR, 733 received compression-only CPR, and 1007 did not receive any bystander CPR. Among these patients, 213 (9.9%) survived with a favorable neurological status 1 month after OHCA, including 108/417 (25.9%) for conventional, 68/733 (9.3%) for compression-only, and 37/1007 (3.7%) for no-bystander CPR. In unadjusted analyses, conventional CPR was superior to compression-only CPR in neurologically favorable survival (odds ratio [OR] 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.45–4.76; P <0.0001), with a trend favoring conventional CPR that was no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment (OR _adjusted 1.52, 95% CI 0.93–2.49), and with further attenuation of the difference in a propensity-matched subset (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81–1.77). Both conventional and compression-only CPR were associated with higher odds for neurologically favorable survival compared with no-bystander CPR (OR _adjusted 5.01, 95% CI 2.98–8.57, and OR _adjusted 3.29, 95% CI 1.93–5.71), respectively. Conclusions: In this population-based study of pediatric OHCA in Japan, both conventional and compression-only CPR were associated with superior outcomes compared with no-bystander CPR. Unadjusted outcomes with conventional CPR were superior to compression-only CPR, with the magnitude of difference attenuated and no longer statistically significant after statistical adjustments. These findings support randomized clinical trials comparing conventional versus compression-only CPR in children, with conventional CPR preferred until such controlled comparative data are available, and either method preferred over no-bystander CPR.

More than 120 000 Japanese individuals have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) annually.^1-3 Although the survival rate from OHCA is improving, no more than approximately 10% of patients with OHCA survive 1 month after OHCA.^1-3 Patients with traumatic OHCA, accounting for less than 10% of the total patients with OHCA, have an extremely low survival rate, not only in Japan⁴ but also throughout the world.^5-8

Delay in administration of epinephrine is associated with decreased survival among children with in-hospital cardiac arrest with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Whether this association is applicable to paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) population remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether time to epinephrine administration is associated with outcomes in paediatric OHCA. This was a nation-wide population-based study of paediatric OHCA in Japan from 2005 to 2012 based on data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. We included paediatric OHCA patients (aged between 1 and 17 years) who received at least one dose of epinephrine. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. A total of 225 patients were included in the final cohort. Among the 225 patients, 23 (10.2%) survived 30 days after OHCA. The median time from emergency call to first epinephrine administration was 26 min [interquartile range, 20–32; range, 9–128; mean (standard deviation), 28.7 (15.5) min]. Longer time to epinephrine administration was associated with decreased chance of survival: 50.0, 41.2, 13.0, 11.6, 3.9, and 3.1%, respectively, when time to epinephrine was treated as a categorical variable categorized into ≤10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, 26–30, or > 30 min (P for trend <0.0001), and adjusted odds ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.82–0.96, P = 0.0011) when time to epinephrine was treated as a linear and continuous variable in a multivariable logistic regression model. Similar trends were observed for prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P = 0.0032) and neurologically favourable survival (P = 0.0014). Among paediatric OHCA patients, delayed administration of epinephrine was associated with a decreased chance of favourable outcomes.

Population aging has rapidly advanced throughout the world and the elderly accounting for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has increased yearly.We identified all adults who experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the All-Japan Utstein Registry of the Fire and Disaster Management Agency, a prospective, population-based clinical registry, between 2005 and 2010. Using multivariable regression, we examined temporal trends in outcomes for OHCA patients by age, as well as the influence of advanced age on outcomes. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after OHCA.Among 605,505 patients, 454,755 (75.1%) were the elderly (≥65 years), and 154,785 (25.6%) were the oldest old (≥85 years). Although neurological outcomes were worse as the age group was older (P < 0.0001 for trend), there was a significant trend toward improved neurological outcomes during the study period by any age group (P < 0.005 for trend). After adjustment for temporal trends in various confounding variables, neurological outcomes improved yearly in all age groups (18-64 years: adjusted OR per year 1.15 [95% CI 1.13-1.18]; 65-84 years: adjusted OR per year 1.12 [95% CI 1.10-1.15]; and ≥85 years: adjusted OR per year 1.08 [95% CI 1.04-1.13]). Similar trends were found in the secondary outcomes.Although neurological outcomes from OHCA ware worse as the age group was older, the rates of favorable neurological outcomes have substantially improved since 2005 even in the elderly, including the oldest old. Careful consideration may be necessary in limiting treatment on OHCA solely for the reason of advanced age.