Iva Strnadova

Prof. Dr. Iva Strnadova

The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 December 2017 in Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJanette S Walmsley
Janette S Walmsley
ISIva Strnadova
Iva Strnadova
KJKelley Johnson
Kelley Johnson

16 November 2022 in Child Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHSaira Hossain
Saira Hossain
SOSue O’nEill
Sue O’nEill
ISIva Strnadova
Iva Strnadova

14 January 2022 in Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDarren Chadwick
Darren Chadwick
KÅKristin Alfredsson Ågren
Kristin Alfredsson Ågren
SCSue Caton
Sue Caton
ECEsther Chiner
Esther Chiner
JDJoanne Danker
Joanne Danker
EWEva Flygare Wallén
Eva Flygare Wallén
The COVID‐19 pandemic has meant a rapid transfer of everyday activities to the online world. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have become more embedded than ever in people's lives. This investigation addresses how this change has affected the lives of people with intellectual disabilities (ID). A two‐step design was used. A rapid review was conducted on empirical studies published between January 2019 and June 2021. Search terms related to ID, ICT use and COVID‐19. A qualitative international bricolage was also conducted corresponding to author nationalities. Data gathered from the review and bricolage were analysed separately using thematic analysis and relationally synthesised. Digital solutions to provide access to COVID‐19 information and guidance seemed inadequate but were seldom empirically studied. Digital poverty, literacy and exclusion remain significant issues for people with ID internationally. People and their carers experienced reduced and removed service provision, loneliness and impoverished daily lives during the pandemic; amelioration of which was facilitated by digital solutions. One solution often used was videoconferencing. Prior experience of digital participation, adequate finances, connection, support and digital literacy mentoring for both people with ID and those providing services and support facilitated digital inclusion. Digital exclusion during COVID‐19 was exacerbated by sociopolitical, structural, individual and support‐related barriers. Although awareness of digital exclusion appears to have been raised, the extent to which this has led to action and change remains unclear. Despite digital exclusion and digital participation benefitting continuation of life, social and emotional well‐being and autonomy, COVID‐19 has not provided the impetus to eradicate digital poverty for people with ID. Governmental support, digital education, creativity and problem solving are required to enable people with ID the human right to be included in the digital world at this essential time and into the future.

22 June 2017 in Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ISIva Strnadova
Iva Strnadova
JWJan Walmsley
Jan Walmsley

21 April 2015 in International Journal of Inclusive Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISIva Strnadova
Iva Strnadova
VHVanda Hájková
Vanda Hájková
LKLea Květoňová
Lea Květoňová
Twenty-four university students with disabilities were interviewed about their experiences studying at Czech universities. The interviews were analysed using the grounded theory approach. The most commonly experienced barriers faced by these students were institutional barriers, attitudinal barriers, and disability-specific barriers. The types of support mentioned by the students included family support, peer support, and support provided by assistants. The participants also shared strategies they used to deal with the barriers they faced. These were assertiveness, self-determination, metacognition, efforts to ‘fit in’, optimism, and career planning. The implications for policy and universities are discussed.

1 June 2019 in Research in Developmental Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJoanne Danker
Joanne Danker
ISIva Strnadova
Iva Strnadova
TCTherese M Cumming
Therese M Cumming