Lomentospora prolificans is an emerging opportunistic pathogen that primarily affects immunocompromised individuals leading to disseminated disease with high mortality rates while also causing infections in healthy populations. Successful recovery from infection is difficult due to high rates of intrinsic resistance to antifungals. Rapid and readily available diagnostic methods, aggressive surgical debridement wherever appropriate, and effective and timely antifungal treatment are the pillars for successful management. Future research will need to clarify the environmental niche of the fungus, further investigate the pathophysiology of infection and define species-specific therapeutic targets.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and interleuking-6 (IL-6), an inflammation biomarker, have been established as distinct targets of the residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. We aimed to investigate the association between them, and the potential clinical implications in ASCVD prevention. A literature search was conducted in PubMed until December 31st, 2022, using relevant keywords. Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels constitute the most common inherited lipid disorder associated with ASCVD. Although Lp(a) levels are mostly determined genetically by the LPA gene locus, they may be altered by acute conditions of stress and chronic inflammatory diseases. Considering its resemblance with low-density lipoproteins, Lp(a) is involved in atherosclerosis, but it also exerts oxidative, thrombotic, antifibrinolytic and inflammatory properties. The cardiovascular efficacy of therapies lowering Lp(a) by >90% is currently investigated. On the other hand, interleukin (IL)-1b/IL-6 pathway also plays a pivotal role in atherosclerosis and residual ASCVD risk. IL-6 receptor inhibitors [IL-6(R)i] lower Lp(a) by 16–41%, whereas ongoing trials are investigating their potential anti-atherosclerotic effect. The Lp(a)-lowering effect of IL-6(R)i might be attributed to the inhibition of the IL-6 response elements in the promoter region of the LPA gene. Although the effect of IL-6(R)i on Lp(a) levels is inferior to that of available Lp(a)-lowering therapies, the dual effect of the former on both inflammation and apolipoprotein (a) synthesis may prove of equal or even greater significance when it comes ASCVD outcomes. More trials are required to establish IL-6(R)i in ASCVD prevention and elucidate their interplay with Lp(a) as well as its clinical significance.

Background: Our aim was to systematically investigate the effect of upadacitinib, an oral JAK-1 selective inhibitor, on lipid profile and cardiovascular disease risk. Methods: PubMed, PubMed Central and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 31 July 2022. We performed a qualitative synthesis of published RCTs to investigate the associations of upadacitinib with lipoprotein changes, along with a quantitative synthesis of MACE and mean lipoprotein changes where there were available data. Results: Nineteen RCTs were eligible for the present systematic review, which included 10,656 patients with a mean age of 51 years and a follow-up period of 12–52 weeks. Increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were noted upon upadacitinib administration (3–48 mg/day) in 15 studies, while the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio remained unchanged. The pooled analyses of three placebo-controlled RCTs (n = 2577) demonstrated that upadacitinib at 15 mg increased the LDL-C by 15.18 mg/dL (95% CI: 7.77–22.59) and HDL-C by 7.89 mg/dL (95% CI: 7.08–8.69). According to the pooled analysis of 15 placebo-controlled RCTs (n = 7695), upadacitinib had no effect on MACE (risk ratio, RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.24–1.60). A sub-analysis focusing on upadacitinib at 15 mg (12 studies, n = 5395) demonstrated similar results (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.19–2.36). Conclusions: Treatment with upadacitinib increases both LDL-C and HDL-C levels. Nevertheless, upadacitinib had no significant effect on the cardiovascular disease risk during a ≤52-week follow-up.

Background: Lomentospora prolificans, a rare, highly virulent filamentous fungus with high rates of intrinsic resistance to antifungals, has been associated with different types of infections in immunocompromised as well as immunocompetent individuals. Objective: To systematically address all relevant evidence regarding L. prolificans disseminated infections in the literature. Methods: We searched Medline via PubMed and Scopus databases through July 2022. We performed a qualitative synthesis of published articles reporting disseminated infections from L. prolificans in humans. Results: A total of 87 studies describing 142 cases were included in our systematic review. The pathogen was most frequently reported in disseminated infections in Spain (n = 47), Australia (n = 33), the USA (n = 21), and Germany (n = 10). Among 142 reported cases, 48.5% were males. Underlying conditions identified for the majority of patients included malignancy (72.5%), hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (23.2%), solid organ transplantation (16%), and AIDS (2%). Lungs, central nervous system, skin, eyes, heart and bones/joints were the most commonly affected organs. Neutropenia was recorded in 52% of patients. The mortality rate was as high as 87.3%. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review conducted on disseminated infections due to this rare microorganism. Physicians should be aware that L. prolificans can cause a diversity of infections with high mortality and primarily affects immunocompromised and neutropenic patients.

To systematically address all the relevant evidence of the association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and COVID-19 infection. We searched PubMed, PubMed Central and medRxiv databases (up to May 2021) for studies related to HDL-C and COVID-19 infection. A qualitative synthesis of published prospective and retrospective studies for the role of low HDL-C levels on COVID-19 infection severity was performed. Thirty-three studies (6 prospective, 27 retrospective) including 11,918 COVID-19 patients were eligible for the systematic review. Twelve studies compared HDL-C levels on admission in COVID-19 patients with healthy controls. In these 12 studies, COVID-19 patients had significantly lower HDL-C levels on admission compared with that of healthy controls. Twenty-eight studies observed the HDL-C levels among COVID-19 diagnosed patients, to establish the role of low HDL-C values in the prognosis of the infection. Twenty-four studies showed a correlation between low HDL-C levels with disease severity, while only 4 studies showed no association. Low HDL-C levels should be added in the list of the others well-known risk factors for COVID-19 severity.

Background: Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), treated with niraparib maintenance, present with haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities. Limited data exist on niraparib safety assessment. Objective: To evaluate niraparib safety profile, as maintenance therapy, in women with platinum-sensitive EOC. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane searches were carried out up to April 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating niraparib versus placebo in EOC patients with a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Regarding the meta-analysis, for dichotomous data, the pooled risk ratio (RR) was calculated. Results: A total of 1539 patients from three RCTs revealed that niraparib-treated patients are associated with a significantly higher risk of any grade of nausea (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.86 to 2.48), fatigue (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.52, p < 0.00001), anemia (RR, 6.86; 95% CI, 2.54 to 18.52, p = 0.0001), thrombocytopenia (RR, 7.02; 95% CI, 1.68 to 29.38, p < 0.00001), vomiting (RR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.50 to 4.19, p = 0.0005), neutropenia (RR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.13 to 7.73, p < 0.00001), headache (RR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.57 to 2.74, p < 0.00001), constipation (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.72 to 2.57, p < 0.00001) and insomnia (RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.89, p = 0.0003) when compared with placebo. For grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, significantly higher risk was only noted for fatigue (RR,6.25; 95% CI, 1.70 to 23.05, p = 0.006), anemia (RR, 16.23; 95% CI, 4.86 to 54.17, p < 0.00001), thrombocytopenia (RR, 35.12; 95% CI, 12.23 to 100.82, p < 0.00001) and neutropenia episodes (RR, 6.35; 95% CI, 2.08 to 19.39, p = 0.001) for those taking niraparib. Notably, incidents of adverse effects and discontinuation rates were substantially lower among patients treated with an individualised niraparib dose than those treated with the standard one. Efficacy was not reduced, and no treatment-related deaths occurred during the included trials. Conclusion: Niraparib is considered an effective and well-tolerated choice, with an improved safety profile, for the maintenance treatment of EOC patients.