Mark L Metersky

Dr. Mark L Metersky


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJoshua P. Metlay
Joshua P. Metlay
GWGrant W. Waterer
Grant W. Waterer
ALAnn C. Long
Ann C. Long
AAAntonio Anzueto
Antonio Anzueto
JBJan Brozek
Jan Brozek
CWCynthia G. Whitney
Cynthia G. Whitney
Background: This document provides evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel conducted pragmatic systematic reviews of the relevant research and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology for clinical recommendations. Results: The panel addressed 16 specific areas for recommendations spanning questions of diagnostic testing, determination of site of care, selection of initial empiric antibiotic therapy, and subsequent management decisions. Although some recommendations remain unchanged from the 2007 guideline, the availability of results from new therapeutic trials and epidemiological investigations led to revised recommendations for empiric treatment strategies and additional management decisions. Conclusions: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on selected diagnostic and treatment strategies for adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

13 December 2016 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMark L Metersky
Mark L Metersky
YWYun Wang
Yun Wang
MKMichael Klompas
Michael Klompas
SESheila Eckenrode
Sheila Eckenrode
ABAnila Bakullari
Anila Bakullari
NENoel Eldridge
Noel Eldridge
From 2006 to 2012, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) decreased.1,2 In medical and surgical intensive care units, between 2006 and 2012, the reported incidence of VAP per 1000 ventilator-days decreased from 3.1 to 0.9 (71% decline) and 5.2 to 2.0 (62% decline), respectively. Whether the decrease was attributable to better care or stricter application of subjective surveillance criteria is unclear.3 The Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (MPSMS)4 has independently measured VAP rates since 2005, using a stable definition of VAP. Trends in MPSMS VAP rates from 2005 through 2013 were analyzed.

1 May 2020 in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RWRichard G. Wunderink
Richard G. Wunderink
ASArjun Srinivasan
Arjun Srinivasan
PBPhilip S. Barie
Philip S. Barie
JCJean Chastre
Jean Chastre
CCCharles S. Dela Cruz
Charles S. Dela Cruz
CWCurtis H. Weiss
Curtis H. Weiss
Intensive care units (ICUs) are an appropriate focus of antibiotic stewardship program efforts because a large proportion of any hospital’s use of parenteral antibiotics, especially broad-spectrum, occurs in the ICU. Given the importance of antibiotic stewardship for critically ill patients and the importance of critical care practitioners as the front line for antibiotic stewardship, a workshop was convened to specifically address barriers to antibiotic stewardship in the ICU and discuss tactics to overcome these. The working definition of antibiotic stewardship is “the right drug at the right time and the right dose for the right bug for the right duration.” A major emphasis was that antibiotic stewardship should be a core competency of critical care clinicians. Fear of pathogens that are not covered by empirical antibiotics is a major driver of excessively broad-spectrum therapy in critically ill patients. Better diagnostics and outcome data can address this fear and expand efforts to narrow or shorten therapy. Greater awareness of the substantial adverse effects of antibiotics should be emphasized and is an important counterargument to broad-spectrum therapy in individual low-risk patients. Optimal antibiotic stewardship should not focus solely on reducing antibiotic use or ensuring compliance with guidelines. Instead, it should enhance care both for individual patients (by improving and individualizing their choice of antibiotic) and for the ICU population as a whole. Opportunities for antibiotic stewardship in common ICU infections, including community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia and sepsis, are discussed. Intensivists can partner with antibiotic stewardship programs to address barriers and improve patient care.

1 March 2023 in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GCGuang-Shing Cheng
Guang-Shing Cheng
KCKristina Crothers
Kristina Crothers
SAStefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti
ABAnne Bergeron
Anne Bergeron
MBMichael Boeckh
Michael Boeckh
SEScott E. Evans
Scott E. Evans
Pneumonia imposes a significant clinical burden on people with immunocompromising conditions. Millions of individuals live with compromised immunity because of cytotoxic cancer treatments, biological therapies, organ transplants, inherited and acquired immunodeficiencies, and other immune disorders. Despite broad awareness among clinicians that these patients are at increased risk for developing infectious pneumonia, immunocompromised people are often excluded from pneumonia clinical guidelines and treatment trials. The absence of a widely accepted definition for immunocompromised host pneumonia is a significant knowledge gap that hampers consistent clinical care and research for infectious pneumonia in these vulnerable populations. To address this gap, the American Thoracic Society convened a workshop whose participants had expertise in pulmonary disease, infectious diseases, immunology, genetics, and laboratory medicine, with the goal of defining the entity of immunocompromised host pneumonia and its diagnostic criteria.

1 May 2021 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SEScott E. Evans
Scott E. Evans
AJAnn L. Jennerich
Ann L. Jennerich
Marwan M. AzarMarwan M. Azar
Marwan M. Azar
BCBin Cao
Bin Cao
KCKristina Crothers
Kristina Crothers
CCCharles S. Dela Cruz
Charles S. Dela Cruz
Background: This document provides evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the diagnostic utility of nucleic acid–based testing of respiratory samples for viral pathogens other than influenza in adults with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: A multidisciplinary panel developed a Population–Intervention–Comparison–Outcome question, conducted a pragmatic systematic review, and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology for clinical recommendations. Results: The panel evaluated the literature to develop recommendations regarding whether routine diagnostics should include nucleic acid–based testing of respiratory samples for viral pathogens other than influenza in suspected CAP. The evidence addressing this topic was generally adjudicated to be of very low quality because of risk of bias and imprecision. Furthermore, there was little direct evidence supporting a role for routine nucleic acid–based testing of respiratory samples in improving critical outcomes such as overall survival or antibiotic use patterns. However, on the basis of direct and indirect evidence, recommendations were made for both outpatient and hospitalized patients with suspected CAP. Testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was not addressed in the literature at the time of the evidence review. Conclusions: The panel formulated and provided their rationale for recommendations on nucleic acid–based diagnostics for viral pathogens other than influenza for patients with suspected CAP.

8 October 2015 in Respirology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMark L Metersky
Mark L Metersky
CFChristopher R. Frei
Christopher R. Frei
EMEric M. Mortensen
Eric M. Mortensen